the distance between the nearest EAF Air Base and the Ethiopian dam is 1400 KMs .... that can be reached through RAFALES, MIG 29 M2 and above all SU-35 .
also they can use body - body air refueling.
View attachment 5176
View attachment 5177
View attachment 5178
That's good to see.
Still, Egyptian Air Force has no tanker aircrafts.
1. Scalp-EG can only be used from Rafale fighter jets. Can you integrate Scalp-EG to Mig-29 or Su-30/Su-35/Russian aircrafts ?
This luxury won't be accorded to most countries. Not some of the closest strategic partners will be accorded these luxuries.
Ask the Indians.
Can their Su-30 or Mig-29 fighter jets fire French munitions? Air to Air missiles? Cruise missiles?
Air to Surface missiles?
2. MiG-29 is a very poor aircraft. Its combat record is testimony to its real ability. The
combat range is different from and lower than the
ferry range of a fighter jet.
The
combat range, or combat radius, of a relatively late model F-16 block 50 could be 550 km.
However, its
ferry range could be well over 3700 km.
The
combat range of a MiG-29, of any variant, is not going to be 1500 km. The approximate distance between Aswan and the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam.
Bear in mind, Ethiopian Air Force, although not the best equipped, still operates Su-27.
Without tanker aircrafts, how many Rafales could Egyptian Air Force send on
multiple sorties to Ethiopia, flying over Sudanese air space?
The
combat radius of the Rafale is less than 1200 km.
Egypt should be able to send zero Rafale aircrafts on combat mission to bomb Ethiopian GERD dam.
That would be true if Egyptian Air Force has no access to tanker aircrafts or airbases in Sudan or any Ethiopian neighbour.