Air-Force The Sunday Times suggesting the U.K. won’t buy more than the current planned 48 F-35

Oublious

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
407
Reaction score
758
Points
93
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Ther mus be a reason why UK is doing this, untill Tempest if finished it will be 15 years later. Did we do the right thing with S400 :D .
 

Barry

Active member
Joined
Oct 17, 2020
Messages
94
Reaction score
213
Points
33
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
48 until the USA makes it a provision that they buy more, within any US/UK trade deals in the future lol
 

MisterLike

Contributor
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Aug 23, 2020
Messages
818
Reaction score
2,846
Points
93
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
Let's not forget that the F-35 despite being a multirole fighter, isn't exactly ideal for air-to-air combat. Practically every serious military which is getting it is planning on making their own air superiority fighters.

So why the sudden change of heart in recent times? Drones. Now that we know how effective they can be there is no going back. Even if you flew a F35 autonomously, why risk a 100 million dollar aircraft when you can use a much cheaper drone. My bet is that we will more jet powered drones in coming years which will make the F35 pointless.

A drone with the same power, agility and weight as an F35 will cost significantly less because there is no cockpit, pilot safety features, advanced helmet, etc. So why mass produce something so expensive, just double down on supersonic drone programs and reserve your pilots for air superiority, where they're actually needed.
 
Top Bottom