Turkish Military Stance in Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,380
Reactions
12 5,102
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Is this possible? that means nothing can enter that area including dumb greeks.
 

nick.f76

New member
Messages
4
Reactions
2
Nation of residence
Greece
Nation of origin
Greece

Turkey’s military strategy for a potential incursion into Greek territory, particularly Western Thrace, was designed to exploit a narrow window of opportunity, which Turkish generals anticipated would close quickly with swift intervention from the US and Europe following any Turkish offensive.
The central focus of the war plan was a military operation in the Aegean, with supplementary actions in the Thrace region of Greece to support the primary theatre. The planners emphasized that any military action in Thrace should focus not on territorial conquest, but on inflicting maximum damage to enemy forces. The objective was to punish rather than occupy.
According to the seminar report, Turkish strategists anticipated that NATO and the EU would quickly intervene if Turkey launched a military offensive in Greece’s Thrace region. Consequently, they concluded that Turkey would have only three to four days to achieve its objectives — enough to inflict significant damage on Greek forces, but not enough for long-term occupation. The ultimate goal, they argued, was to seize control of the Aegean islands.
Greece’s recent military cooperation agreements with the US and France — particularly those granting the US expanded access to Greek military and naval bases — have severely undermined Turkey’s invasion plans. The presence of US troops at these facilities makes it considerably riskier for Turkey to target Greek military assets since doing so could provoke a direct confrontation with the United States, something Ankara is eager to avoid.
This is undoubtedly a key factor behind Ankara’s increasingly hostile rhetoric toward Washington’s defense engagement in Greece and its vocal opposition to Greece’s strengthened defense ties with both the US and France.
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,810
Reactions
11 9,430
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan

Turkey’s military strategy for a potential incursion into Greek territory, particularly Western Thrace, was designed to exploit a narrow window of opportunity, which Turkish generals anticipated would close quickly with swift intervention from the US and Europe following any Turkish offensive.
The central focus of the war plan was a military operation in the Aegean, with supplementary actions in the Thrace region of Greece to support the primary theatre. The planners emphasized that any military action in Thrace should focus not on territorial conquest, but on inflicting maximum damage to enemy forces. The objective was to punish rather than occupy.
According to the seminar report, Turkish strategists anticipated that NATO and the EU would quickly intervene if Turkey launched a military offensive in Greece’s Thrace region. Consequently, they concluded that Turkey would have only three to four days to achieve its objectives — enough to inflict significant damage on Greek forces, but not enough for long-term occupation. The ultimate goal, they argued, was to seize control of the Aegean islands.
Greece’s recent military cooperation agreements with the US and France — particularly those granting the US expanded access to Greek military and naval bases — have severely undermined Turkey’s invasion plans. The presence of US troops at these facilities makes it considerably riskier for Turkey to target Greek military assets since doing so could provoke a direct confrontation with the United States, something Ankara is eager to avoid.
This is undoubtedly a key factor behind Ankara’s increasingly hostile rhetoric toward Washington’s defense engagement in Greece and its vocal opposition to Greece’s strengthened defense ties with both the US and France.

Anyone sharing the nordicmonitor as a source should be banned.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,222
Reactions
48 20,861
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't agree on that. I think it's an interesting POV and opinion. What is important is a country doing necessary moves to counter such political moves. Not making any moves is the same as admitting they have no moves aka cards in our hands to play.

Alas the king is naked.
 

mTT

Committed member
Messages
210
Reactions
5 619
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't agree on that. I think it's an interesting POV and opinion. What is important is a country doing necessary moves to counter such political moves. Not making any moves is the same as admitting they have no moves aka cards in our hands to play.

Alas the king is naked.
You have the same views as nordicmonitor news portal?
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,222
Reactions
48 20,861
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
You have the same views as nordicmonitor news portal?
No, but we're an open forum and should be grown up enough to accept that others have their own opinions.

I mean what did Türkiye do when the Greek came sailing all the way to our coast ?
 

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,352
Reactions
43 5,234
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't agree on that. I think it's an interesting POV and opinion. What is important is a country doing necessary moves to counter such political moves. Not making any moves is the same as admitting they have no moves aka cards in our hands to play.

Alas the king is naked.
No, but we're an open forum and should be grown up enough to accept that others have their own opinions.

I mean what did Türkiye do when the Greek came sailing all the way to our coast ?
Did you read the article?
That is not a POV or opinion, it is an accusation.
 

mTT

Committed member
Messages
210
Reactions
5 619
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
No, but we're an open forum and should be grown up enough to accept that others have their own opinions.

Read an ISIS newspaper in a cafe on the stroget street in Copenhagen, Denmark, and when someone comes up to you, use the words “different opinions”, “free world”, ‘freedom’, “democracy” to describe yourself.

The author of that article is a FETO deserter.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,908
Reactions
99 13,485
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Turkey’s military strategy for a potential incursion into Greek territory, particularly Western Thrace, was designed to exploit a narrow window of opportunity, which Turkish generals anticipated would close quickly with swift intervention from the US and Europe following any Turkish offensive.
The central focus of the war plan was a military operation in the Aegean, with supplementary actions in the Thrace region of Greece to support the primary theatre. The planners emphasized that any military action in Thrace should focus not on territorial conquest, but on inflicting maximum damage to enemy forces. The objective was to punish rather than occupy.
According to the seminar report, Turkish strategists anticipated that NATO and the EU would quickly intervene if Turkey launched a military offensive in Greece’s Thrace region. Consequently, they concluded that Turkey would have only three to four days to achieve its objectives — enough to inflict significant damage on Greek forces, but not enough for long-term occupation. The ultimate goal, they argued, was to seize control of the Aegean islands.
Greece’s recent military cooperation agreements with the US and France — particularly those granting the US expanded access to Greek military and naval bases — have severely undermined Turkey’s invasion plans. The presence of US troops at these facilities makes it considerably riskier for Turkey to target Greek military assets since doing so could provoke a direct confrontation with the United States, something Ankara is eager to avoid.
This is undoubtedly a key factor behind Ankara’s increasingly hostile rhetoric toward Washington’s defense engagement in Greece and its vocal opposition to Greece’s strengthened defense ties with both the US and France.
22 year old contingency plan leaked back in 2011 by the gulenists.

Literally has nothing to do with recent developments in the region of last 5 years.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom