TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[Oublious]

Should we also assume that KE Block 2 RCS is rather conservative?

It is the same with upgrades .

 

[Oublious]

After Bayraktar who made the first step to unmanned fighter concept, DARPA is starting the Longshot project. First prototype will be ready in 2024, we are lucky with Bayraktar and ther visionary doctrine. We have destroyed the drone sector, so now is Israel lturning the thides and getting ready to sell armed drones.

Get ready to the future....


General Atomics desigh..

 

[Zafer]

Darpa is the SAGE of the US of America.

 

[Philip the Arab]

UAE has TB2 confirmed during exercise with Malaysia

 

[UkroTurk]

How do we know that Kızılelma Block2 rcs value is 0.005?

(With the stealth-compatible low-detectable LO[12] geometry mentioned in the figures, the absence of a cockpit canopy, the concealment of the air intake ducts, the radar antenna tilt precaution and the geometric precaution of the wing + canard attack / trailing edges and the addition of a magnetic layer, and the black paint, which we consider to be radar absorbing, we can predict the head on RCS value of the Kızılelma as -10dBsqm = 0.1m2 for the Block1 version in terms of a safe calculation. The RCS of the Block2 version, which will be mounted on 7.5mm thick RAM panels tuned to 10GHz X band, is predicted as 0.005m2 in the sample calculation (Table-1). We will not publish the full graphical RCS detail analysis of Kızılelma.)

When "stealth" or "Low RCS " fighter switches radar from 90km, it doesn't mean enemy fighters detect emitting signal? So your stealth fighter turns into unstealth fighter. I don't think they send BVR missiles from 90km.

I really wonder, How the stealth fighters manage the radar engagement process without being noticed.

 

[Heartbang]

When "stealth" or "Low RCS " fighter switches radar from 90km, it doesn't mean enemy fighters detect emitting signal? So your stealth fighter turns into unstealth fighter. I don't think they send BVR missiles from 90km.

I really wonder, How the stealth fighters manage the radar engagement process without being noticed.

Advanced datalinks help with that. Our Peace Eagles have the ability to guide AMRAAM's launched from other aircraft, for example.

 

[Afif]

Advanced datalinks help with that. Our Peace Eagles have the ability to guide AMRAAM's launched from other aircraft, for example.

Source?

 

[Baris]

UAE has TB2 confirmed during exercise with Malaysia

View attachment 54675
View attachment 54676

Great now we can have Tb-2 vs Tb-2 in Libya

 

[Radonsider]

When "stealth" or "Low RCS " fighter switches radar from 90km, it doesn't mean enemy fighters detect emitting signal? So your stealth fighter turns into unstealth fighter. I don't think they send BVR missiles from 90km.

I really wonder, How the stealth fighters manage the radar engagement process without being noticed.

LPI

 

[Heartbang]

Source?

Syrian L-39 Shot Down By Turkish Air Force F-16 Over Syria

Third kill over Idlib by the Turkish Air Force in three days. Both the Turkish Ministry of Defense and the Syrian News Agency SANA have confirmed that a

theaviationist.com

 

[Philip the Arab]

Great now we can have Tb-2 vs Tb-2 in Libya

UAE isn’t in Libya but it needs hundreds of drones for its major operation zones.

Theyre grabbing TB2s, Chinese drones, American drones, and trying to make their own drones.

Operation zones include inside of the country itself, Arab gulf, Yemen, Horn of Africa, and anywhere else they operate that we dont know.

 

[Afif]

Syrian L-39 Shot Down By Turkish Air Force F-16 Over Syria

Third kill over Idlib by the Turkish Air Force in three days. Both the Turkish Ministry of Defense and the Syrian News Agency SANA have confirmed that a

theaviationist.com

Bro, AWACS does not guide missiles.

And article doesn't say anything like that.

 

[Hasanrize]

Bro, AWACS does not guide missiles.

And article doesn't say anything like that.

In that particular event, F-16 did not lock on the target aircraft. Instead, all targeting was done by AWACS, and F-16 did nothing more than being a carrier for missiles.

 

[Afif]

In that particular event, F-16 did not lock on the target aircraft. Instead, all targeting was done by AWACS, and F-16 did nothing more than being a carrier for missiles.

Can you provide an actual source please?

 

[what]

Can you provide an actual source please?

I can confirm what he posted, it made quite a bit of buzz in defence news and social media accounts back then.
But my 2 minutes spend googling couldn't find a source for it.

 

[boredaf]

But my 2 minutes spend googling couldn't find a source for it.

Your google-fu needs some work mate lol

Can you provide an actual source please?

Here is a link for you: https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/koral-kor-etti-f-16-ve-sihalar-vurdu?page=15

And here is the relevant part translated, it is at the end of the article:

"The HIK aircraft immediately reported this information to the operations center and F-16 fighter jets on patrol in the area. One of the F-16 fighter jets directed to the area turned off its radar to avoid detection by enemy aircraft and radars.

The HIK aircraft transmitted the radar image it had processed to the computer of this F-16. Using this radar data, the F-16 pilot fired the medium-range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM). According to the information provided by Savunmasanayist.com and confirmed by Milliyet, this allowed the F-16 pilot to shoot down both SU-24 fighter jets without being noticed."

 

[Siper>MMU]

Actually this was not real. Guidance still done by F-16s radar.

 

[boredaf]

Actually this was not real. Guidance still done by F-16s radar.

And now I'm going to need a source on that lol

*and so the cycle of life in an online forum continues*

 

[MADDOG]

Aksungur assembly

 

[Agha Sher]

Aksungur assembly

View attachment 54681
View attachment 54682


View attachment 54683

So at least 9 Aksungur produced/under production so far.