• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,311
Reactions
276 22,540
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Again, I'm sure they are working on it but the nose has to be something like 70 or 80 cm in diameter (I think F-16 radome is about that size) to be able to fit Murad, if it was first designed to fit into an F-16 radome. Take a look at the nose of Anka-3, does that look like it can fit in there at all?

TAI09833_1,6471.jpg
1792166457342.jpeg


Does an Aesa radar has to be perfect circle or square? No! It can be rectangular, octagonal or ellipsoidal. In fact most are rectangular. I measured that area under the air intake to be over 110cm wide. Under air intake the plane is quite plump.
They altered a lot of measurements in Kaan P1.
They can do the same for this too.
This new plane is to have a 1.7 ton useful load capacity. They are most likely building it to carry an Aesa radar too.
If there is a will there is a way.

EDIT

@IC3M@N FX Ivchenko Progress can not manufacture engines. They are a design bureau.
It is the bombed Motor Sich company that manufactures engines. As far as I know, after heavy bombings the only engines they are still trying to manufacture are helicopter ones.
 
Last edited:

Tonyukuk

Contributor
Messages
584
Reactions
5 1,411
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Kazakhstan
Anka 2 is known as Aksungur, I wonder if Anka 3 will also have its own name?

If you guys had to choose, what would you name it?
 

Mis_TR_Like

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
2,017
Reactions
54 7,611
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
Anka 2 is known as Aksungur, I wonder if Anka 3 will also have its own name?

If you guys had to choose, what would you name it?
Going by appearance and its role as a deep strike aircraft that's a total nightmare for adversaries, I'd choose Erlik.
 
Top Bottom