Ukraine has to have lesser losses then Russia not greater losses. talks of new buffer zones and ukraine beginning to evacuate people from their own regions sound like they are planning for more territorial losses to give to RussiaMmmm... The plan for the war was to get to Kiev, overthrow the Ukrainian government and take over the country. It was not to occupy 4 oblasts in Ukraine. Russia failed to take over the country. Russia has failed to occupy the 4 oblasts in Ukraine, Putin's reduced war aims. He says he will keep going until he has achieved his war aims.
Well Ukraine is burning through billions of dollars of equipment far faster than what Russia can produce if we look at the statistics I provided earlier that shows where and when ukraines equipment got destroyed, compared to where and when Russia's equipment got destroyed.Why would Europe accept Russia demilitarising Ukraine? Ukraine did not attack Russia. If I remember correctly Russia mounted a full scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Did Russian TV not cover it? If either country is to be demilitarised it should be the aggressor.
As far as I am aware Moldova and Ukraine are still not a part of NATO, if they do become a part of NATO that would be good news for Russia to keep less of a military presence because of nukes in their new territories in Ukraine and have their hands free with a bigger population and military to fuck over the middle east and africa.You advocate empire rebuilding - perhaps a land bridge through southern Ukraine to Transnistria. That would be followed by a Russian attack on Moldova, placing Russia in a position to attack EU countries. No way would the EU countries accept that.
the proof provided tells me otherwise, its more like watching the birth of a superpower thats going to join the US and China soon.The days of the Russian empire are over. I wish Russians would accept that.
Where are you getting this bullshit from? Western media thought that, not Russia.Putin thought Russia would steamroller Ukraine so fast that the show would be over before countries could come to Ukraine's aid. So did I. For a few days. Then Russia's armour ground to a halt. With all the corruption throughout the Russian system the armour stopped working and it suddenly became apparent that a Russian conquest of Ukraine was not inevitable. That was enough for the US and the Europeans to decide to back Ukraine, the US with timidity and because of that timidity, frustrating and delaying European military support.
yeah blowing things up back and forth with that can be rebuit a week or a few months at most later while ukraine is going further west does not look good to me. The further west russia goes the less strike opportunities Ukraine will receive.That was a long time ago. Now the tables have been turned. The war has been brought to Russia. Russia is doing badly trying to defend itself.
GDP cant win a war if you don't have a military industry that can produce long range missiles or SAMs or scrambling to find shells somewhere lol. YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS, were you asleep when the US was begging other countries to give patriots missiles for the Iran war? I think even Tusk is getting into deep shit for giving Ukraine Patriot SAMs then giving them to Israel.Wars are won by money building weapons. Russia is out of money. Do you know Russia's GDP? Do you know Europe's GDP?
Bigger population then ukraine and 2 websites showing me ukraine is losing equipment excessively bad while depleting europes own stockpiles. To me it looks like the other way around because you know the evidence being visually shown here.PS Russia demilitarising Ukraine? I love your surrealist sense of humour.
Russia has a couple hundred of sukhois as well and most of those typhoons, rafales and F-35s cant do much of anything if you are depleted with SAMs that cant protect any airbases.Even when we look the basic parameters, what possibly Russia can do against couple hundreds of Typhoons, Rafals and F35.
didn't Wagner kick out some french army in Africa a while ago?French army was basically toying with the insurgents and what Russia can protect?
Are you guys trying to be funny? I don't get the joke. Tell me who is losing more equipment and who has a more limited manpower population? I provided the hint here already
why are we still ignoring these 2 sites? Just because it does not fit your narratives means that it has to be ignored. Not a dreamer of fantasy bullshit and I want most people here to be the same.
Last edited: