Latest Thread
Here, and still laughing.Well, where are all those (Turkish) members, who were laughing their asses off when i claimed that Russia was winning in the very very beginning of this war?
For one this is just another version or improvisation of the earlier "The real Russian army is in Kyiv waiting for NATO" argument.
Russia made big gains in first week of the war, when Ukraine was not mobilized:Well, where are all those (Turkish) members, who were laughing their asses off when i claimed that Russia was winning in the very very beginning of this war?
Where are you guys?
Please scroll back in this thread and see the stupid chearing comments of Turkish members claiming Russia would be destroyed by this war.
You guys know nothing about Russia, and also you dont know s.hit about Turkey. Just blablabla.
Moldova goverment resigned today. What's going on there?
61/71 cruise missiles intercepted:
View attachment 53938
2 russian missiles crossed Romanian border.
Well its more simple than you think Poland is getting a shitload of equipment and even a few days ago went to order more HIMARs and Polands prime minister made some war rhetoric speeches this past week about saving Europe, also those troops outside the borders could be used later because the less ukrainians there are(AFU dragging civilians) the less casualties there will be for russian troops to plan there charges because Wagner is expandable thus doing the dirty work pushing the huge column of AFU units back. 300k Russian troops were used in the 1st 2 months and 80K was left afterwards in the operation to create a room of negotiations with the west which we know didnt work out later and might take longer than expected which was the reason 300k+ was mobilized because Ukraine kept getting armed and Poland keeps getting a shitload of equipment so it would make some sense to call for a mobilization. Don't feel embarrassed I have seen some knuckle draggers (not you) make more worse arguments by saying Russian aircrafts are barely involved in SEAD and I make a simple response saying drones, cruise missiles and artillery helps meet the same objectives striking strategic locations and units.The entire Russian argument about Bakhmut is :
If Wagner alone (we know this is an exageration) could take Bakhmut,then off course we can take Ukraine as a whole with other units involved
For one this is just another version or improvisation of the earlier "The real Russian army is in Russia waiting for NATO" argument.
Even if its true,this shows just how ridiculous Russian war planning is. War is serious business, this is not 2 guys fighting in a bar showing manliness and chivalry by being fair. In a war, cheating is not only allowed but recommended.
If we use"the real Russian army is in Russia" argument ,then the blame should be given to the morons which is the Russian generals and staffs who is purposefully nullifying Russian advantage vis a vis Ukraine by allowing Kyiv the luxury to face 3rd rate Russian army instead of "the real Russian army"
If we use "we only use wagner and hold 300K troops inside Russia" argument, the blame will still be burdened to the Russian war planners who deliberately put 300K soldiers away from the frontline instead of helping their troops . Thereby prolonging the capture of Bakhmut into a year long fight.
Using the two stupid argument above and assuming Russians believe their own shit. We can assume in a NATO v Russian federation war. Russia will INTENTIONALLY keep the bulk of Russian military power in Siberia instead of the Baltic and Belarus to fight against NATO and purposefully send a brigade of wagner to face off field army sized NATO unit.
That means Russia is either being chivalristic or overly stupid in its war plan.
Russia made big gains in first week of the war, when Ukraine was not mobilized:
View attachment 53937
Since then for nearly 1 year they either retreat or advance WW1 style 1 km a month destroying everything with artillery and sending human waves.