US-Pakistan talks on military bases reach impasse: report

Kaptaan

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Joined
Sep 12, 2020
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
2,438
Points
113
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Pakistan
1623142029958.png

WASHINGTON: The United States continues to focus on Pakistan for a military base in the region, although some American officials believe the negotiations have reached an impasse for now, The New York Times reported on Monday.
The US intelligence agency CIA did use a base in Pakistan to launch drone strikes against militants but “was kicked out of the facility in 2011, when US relations with Pakistan unraveled,” the report adds.
“Some American officials (told the newspaper) that negotiations with Pakistan had reached an impasse for now. Others have said the option remains on the table and a deal is possible,” the report explains.
According to NYT, William J. Burns, the CIA director, recently made an unannounced visit to Islamabad to meet the chief of the Pakistani military and the head of the directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence. US Defence Secretary Lloyd J. Austin also has had frequent calls with the Pakistani military chief about getting the country’s help for future US operations in Afghanistan.

Mr Burns did not bring up the base issue during his trip to Pakistan as the visit focused on broader counterterrorism cooperation but “some of Mr Austin’s discussions have been more direct,” the report adds.
Analysing Pakistan’s reluctance in offering a base to the US, the report notes that “the government in Islamabad is unlikely to sign off on any US strikes against the Taliban that are launched from a base in Pakistan.”
Yet, “some American officials believe Pakistan wants to allow US access to a base if it can control how it is used,” the report adds while pointing out that “public opinion in the country has been strongly against any renewed presence by the United States.”
The report also quotes from Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s speech in the parliament last month, saying that “no US base will be allowed by Prime Minister Imran Khan so long he is in power”.
The report points out that the CIA used the Shamsi air base in Balochistan to carry out hundreds of drone strikes during a surge that began in 2008. The strikes focused primarily on suspected Al Qaeda operatives in Pakistan’s mountainous tribal areas, but they also crossed the border into Afghanistan.
The report notes that Pakistan’s government “refused to publicly acknowledge that it was allowing the CIA operations and “will want to proceed cautiously” with a new relationship.
The report claims that in discussions with American officials, “the Pakistanis have demanded a variety of restrictions in exchange for the use of a base in the country, and they have effectively required that they sign off on any targets that either the CIA or the military would want to hit inside Afghanistan.”
Published in Dawn, June 8th, 2021
 

mulj

Contributor
Joined
Sep 18, 2020
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
1,559
Points
113
Nation of residence
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
not going to happen, to much risk for inner Pakistan stability without lucrative tempts from usa side. Politely decline and continue fortify border along extended friendly hand to the all sides in Afganistan.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 24, 2020
Messages
4,620
Reaction score
10,829
Points
113
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Pakistan will gain nothing from the cooperation, long term or otherwise. Since many other countries are able to field UAV and gather intelligence.

I guess the US needs to open up the coffers and get used to nodding "yes" to a whole bunch of demands expected nothing in return, but to reach a cordial relation.
 

Kaptaan

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Joined
Sep 12, 2020
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
2,438
Points
113
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Pakistan
The Pakistani demand officially is that such a request can only work if USA agrees to giving Pakistan equal operational influence on the activities of such a base. That is for many mission to be effected would require a nod from a Pakistani official. Thus all actions will be signed by both countries. This would mean such activities would not hurt Pakistan's interests. My own view is if US agrees to this then the matter could move forward. In addition such a agreement would carry other inducements for Pakistan.

The fact is USA still has enormous influence and power. Therefore it makes eminent sense to take advantage of that AS LONG as it does not hurt or damage Pakistan's self interest.

I do think though that PM Imran Khan would struggle to justify a US military base politically given that for two decades he has very actively opposed US military intervention.
 

mulj

Contributor
Joined
Sep 18, 2020
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
1,559
Points
113
Nation of residence
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
The Pakistani demand officially is that such a request can only work if USA agrees to giving Pakistan equal operational influence on the activities of such a base. That is for many mission to be effected would require a nod from a Pakistani official. Thus all actions will be signed by both countries. This would mean such activities would not hurt Pakistan's interests. My own view is if US agrees to this then the matter could move forward. In addition such a agreement would carry other inducements for Pakistan.

The fact is USA still has enormous influence and power. Therefore it makes eminent sense to take advantage of that AS LONG as it does not hurt or damage Pakistan's self interest.

I do think though that PM Imran Khan would struggle to justify a US military base politically given that for two decades he has very actively opposed US military intervention.
usa would never agree to such terms, it is dead end from begiining, that would basically mean that pakistani isi oversee cia operations, not realistic by my opinion.
but in diplomacy way of speaking i think you played it well, no open decline just puting rational conditions like any souvereign country would, as i read it showing some spine without door shutting.
 
Top Bottom