Why Pakistan is not a walkover.

Kaptaan

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,734
Reactions
4,073
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Interesting, mature and well reasoned analysis by Indian expert on the Pakistan military. Some points he makes -

  • Pakistan has never lost on the western theatre [Pakistan mainland] ~ 14:55
  • If we [India] had beaten Pakistan decisively like we say then the cease fire line/line of control would have been obliterated ~ 15:30

 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
3,442
Reactions
11 9,063
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
If you go to war its better your enemy thinks you are a walk over. Because if they take you seriously they will make plans and contingency and in general fight harder and better.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Interesting, mature and well reasoned analysis by Indian expert on the Pakistan military. Some points he makes -

  • Pakistan has never lost on the western theatre [Pakistan mainland] ~ 14:55
  • If we [India] had beaten Pakistan decisively like we say then the cease fire line/line of control would have been obliterated ~ 15:30
Factually incorrect. In 65 India captured Kargil for good. In 71 they captured the town of Chachro well inside Sindh (which they kept till after Shimla agreement) and captured the Baltistani town of Turtuk.

Sawhney is like the anti Arnab - same lies and exaggerations except on the opposite side.
 

Waz

Committed member
Messages
241
Reactions
926
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Countries with significant military strength can never be a walkover.
There's also the fact Pakistan and India know each other well.
 

Jackdaws

Experienced member
Messages
2,759
Reactions
1 1,583
Nation of residence
India
Nation of origin
India
Countries with significant military strength can never be a walkover.
There's also the fact Pakistan and India know each other well.
Of course it's not a walkover. Point is any inference espoused should be rooted in fact.
 
Top Bottom