GÖKDENİZ ER Point Defence Missile System

Which platforms of TN could use Gökdeniz ER?

  • Ada Class

    Votes: 18 90.0%
  • İstif Class

    Votes: 15 75.0%
  • YTKP patrol boats

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • B class Corvettes

    Votes: 8 40.0%
  • Barbaros class Corvettes

    Votes: 14 70.0%
  • Gabya Class Corvettes

    Votes: 9 45.0%
  • TCG ANADOLU

    Votes: 14 70.0%

  • Total voters
    20
T

Turko

Guest
1636440451834.png

1636440470564.png

1636440502824.png





Gökdeniz ER deserves its own thread.

I look forward to seeing real Gökdeniz ER platform which is much more than LEVENT platform.

Comparing Gökdeniz with Levent , i would say it's totally real air defense system not just a SUNGUR based simple platform.

Gökdeniz ER most likely will use IIR guided A2A missiles which have datalink capacity.

So Gökdeniz ER would give much more air defense capacity against UAVs, Fighters, Supersonic Cruise Missiles.

İt will be equaliant of CAMM but horizantal launchers. So the system could be applied current warships with limited spaces for VLS.

our ADA class have just rear RIM-116 with 8km range and 4 km altitude while ships are very open to threats.

Currently Turkish defence industry doesn't have compact VLS as same as CAMM . So with very cheap and simple construction , we could apply the system on ADA class as well as İstif Class.

Also we are planning to use SİPERs in I-Class which has limited VLS cells.

Additional 2 x11 missiles would transform them real beast.


İmagine Ada Class and İ-Class have two separated Gökdeniz launchers which will cover 360 degree against multiple attacks from different sides.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T

Turko

Guest
Ada and Istanbul class with a few minor restorations could have left and right sided top launchers. Two launchers can be placed on the captain's bridge top of the ship.

I will have to show my Photoshop proficiency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,641
Reactions
37 19,751
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think platforms the size of OPV and upwards (65m+) would be better for such a system. Because I imagine the size and weight would take up a lot of space (I imagine it to be as big or bigger than Levent).

If it's smaller and has fewer, let's say just like sungur system and ciws like STAMP then it could be viable, but size alone isn't enough it would need it's on radar and sensor and CMS etc.
 
T

Turko

Guest
isn't enough it would need it's on radar and sensor and CMS etc.
Every Gökdeniz ER platform has own fixed 4 radars , however the Ada Class have own search radar so i think it can work with main radars.
size and weight would take up a lot of space (I imagine it to be as big or bigger than Levent).
Not much more than RAM. 2 Gökdeniz ER launchers could be fit top of the bridge.
wouldn't there be limitations?
I'm not an engineer, let's engineers speak .

İn my humble opinion there might be just fire hazard which is very easy to solve.
IMG_20211109_115048.jpg

Look at Korean frigate which has top mounted RAM. As you can see it's not a problem launching missiles just next to radars and sensors.

I think Gökdeniz ER much lighter than RAM as it has 11 missiles. ASELSAN must have used last gen compact and light mechanic parts.
İt's not impossible to fit 2 launchers.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,314
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Gokdeniz-ER is an eleven missile system, similar to Sea-Ram.
Sea-Ram has stand alone capability. It can be utilised in all sorts of different classes of ships. In it’s latest form it uses the RAM block two missiles.
However Roketsan’s Levent is more akin to RAM system with block 2 missiles. It will be more potent and with longer ranges containing 21 missiles.
So as I see it we have a Sea-Ram equivalent in the form of Gokdeniz-ER. And a RAM system in the form of Levent of Roketsan.
If we are going for missiles similar to Ram block 2, then the operational altitude and the range of these systems will be greatly enhanced. We may expect 8km+ and 10km+ respectively.

RAM Block 2
RIM-116A/B RAMRAM Block 2
Target's Max Altitude (meter)6,1008,100
Target's Min Altitude (meter)1.51.5
Warhead (kilogram)9.111
Weight (kilogram)74.488.2
 
T

Turko

Guest
Gokdeniz-ER is an eleven missile system, similar to Sea-Ram.
Sea-Ram has stand alone capability. It can be utilised in all sorts of different classes of ships. In it’s latest form it uses the RAM block two missiles.
However Roketsan’s Levent is more akin to RAM system with block 2 missiles. It will be more potent and with longer ranges containing 21 missiles.
So as I see it we have a Sea-Ram equivalent in the form of Gokdeniz-ER. And a RAM system in the form of Levent of Roketsan.
If we are going for missiles similar to Ram block 2, then the operational altitude and the range of these systems will be greatly enhanced. We may expect 8km+ and 10km+ respectively.

RAM Block 2
RIM-116A/B RAMRAM Block 2
Target's Max Altitude (meter)6,1008,100
Target's Min Altitude (meter)1.51.5
Warhead (kilogram)9.111
Weight (kilogram)74.488.2
According to producers catalog Block 2 has just range of 10km. I don't think it can reach 8km altitude.

CAMM barely reaches those numbers.

Gökdeniz ER much more than RIM-116 block2 . İ would say it's range close to CAMM.

IMG_20211109_125504.jpg


 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,314
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't think it can reach 8km altitude.
Even though there are no clear cut effective altitude figures for Block 2 version, it is only logical to expect 8+km altitude for a missile that outperforms it’s block 1 version by over 1.5 times in effective intercept range. Block 2 can engage a threat that is 20+ km away and eliminate it at 10km.
Block 2 is larger, longer, faster and has an improved dual pulse rocket motor. I. Sunnetci has given a lot of info on it.
 
T

Turko

Guest
Even though there are no clear cut effective altitude figures for Block 2 version, it is only logical to expect 8+km altitude for a missile that outperforms it’s block 1 version by over 1.5 times in effective intercept range. Block 2 can engage a threat that is 20+ km away and eliminate it at 10km.
Block 2 is larger, longer, faster and has an improved dual pulse rocket motor. I. Sunnetci has given a lot of info on it.
Let's forget about RIM-116 . Since we have mighty Gökdeniz ER , we shouldn't care about it no more:))

Let's guess how many km range and altitude our system could reach?

20 km range and 8km would be ?
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,503
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,896
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
View attachment 35272
View attachment 35273
View attachment 35274




Gökdeniz ER deserves its own thread.

I look forward to seeing real Gökdeniz ER platform which is much more than LEVENT platform.

Comparing Gökdeniz with Levent , i would say it's totally real air defense system not just a SUNGUR based simple platform.

Gökdeniz ER most likely will use IIR guided A2A missiles which have datalink capacity.

So Gökdeniz ER would give much more air defense capacity against UAVs, Fighters, Supersonic Cruise Missiles.

İt will be equaliant of CAMM but horizantal launchers. So the system could be applied current warships with limited spaces for VLS.

our ADA class have just rear RIM-116 with 8km range and 4 km altitude while ships are very open to threats.

Currently Turkish defence industry doesn't have compact VLS as same as CAMM . So with very cheap and simple construction , we could apply the system on ADA class as well as İstif Class.

Also we are planning to use SİPERs in I-Class which has limited VLS cells.

Additional 2 x11 missiles would transform them real beast.


İmagine Ada Class and İ-Class have two separated Gökdeniz launchers which will cover 360 degree against multiple attacks from different sides.

Also Navy wants a quadpackable missile even TF-2000s mission profile depends on this, it is the period for the story, Roketsan or anybody else has to make it :).

So what i would like on I-Class would be 2 Nazar-L and 1 Gokdeniz + 1 Phalanx but those will be hard to fit.

We need gokdeniz ER or Levent on FAC and patrol boat. Aselsan Tubitak and Roketsan should join forces here to introduce a standalone system that can launch sungur-N and ram like missile with options in size (like 11 or 16 or 21).

Patrol boats may use mixed sungur-N and ciws missile, FACs may use only ciws missile etc.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,314
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Let's forget about RIM-116 . Since we have mighty Gökdeniz ER , we shouldn't care about it no more:))

Let's guess how many km range and altitude our system could reach?

20 km range and 8km would be ?
I agree! But have you read the last statement of I Sunnetci? The last two corvettes may have been commissioned without air defence missiles.
We do need these indigenously produced Point Defence weapons. Beauty of these will be the fact that they are not known or recognised weapons. Hence any weapon trying to thwart it, won’t be readily have the means to do so.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,503
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,896
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I agree! But have you read the last statement of I Sunnetci? The last two corvettes may have been commissioned without air defence missiles.
We do need these indigenously produced Point Defence weapons. Beauty of these will be the fact that they are not known or recognised weapons. Hence any weapon trying to thwart it, won’t be readily have the means to do so.
They have the missiles they may not have the latest block or sufficient number of spares.
These kind of rumors and information leaks are highly dangerous and would be classified under intelligence leak. Literally, this information helps for nothing forward.
Like we all know TN didnt get the latest block of RAM, but those corvettes had the missiles.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,641
Reactions
37 19,751
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
with Levent, Gökdeniz ER, and Sungur I would be quite happy if Tn and TCG vessels could be fitted with these as I imagine that any decent size patrol vessel (let's just say 50+tonnage) could be fittet with one or another or both.

I would prefer that TCG got Dearsan OPV-65 type and fitted with Gökdeniz ER additionally.
 

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
981
Reactions
14 4,181
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
They have the missiles they may not have the latest block or sufficient number of spares.
These kind of rumors and information leaks are highly dangerous and would be classified under intelligence leak. Literally, this information helps for nothing forward.
Like we all know TN didnt get the latest block of RAM, but those corvettes had the missiles.


Imagine being so petty and pathetic you block the sale of a Point Defence missile. Something solely Defensive which if even wanted couldn’t use offensively.

Man I can’t wait until reach a level in which we can comfortably sever ties with the US and make them look like this once they realize any meaningful reach they had is gone.
 
T

Turko

Guest
Let's remember Turkish IIR A2A missile that possible element of Gökdeniz ER.

Notice that According to Anadolu Agency: Bozdoğan weights 140 kg whereas RIM-116 weights 74kg and CAMM weights 100kg.

Comparing Bozdoğan with Sidewinder again Aim -9 weights 85kg.

So Bozdoğan is really heavy missile.

1636540489831.png

1636540924574.png

1636540224919.png

1636540403900.png

1636540444618.png
 

Agha Sher

Experienced member
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,755
Reactions
11 9,303
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Afghanistan
T

Turko

Guest
@Anmdt Dear why does German Navy love RAM so much?

They haven't put their Millennium CIWS onto their frigates.

Another interesting thing is they replaced VLS with frontal RAM for F125 Baden-Württemberg class.

Last question, is vertical exit of exhaust gas more reliable? Alman fırkateyn ve korvetlerinde baca yerinden tasarruf için mi egzoz çıkışı denize veriliyor?


Look at the examples of dual RAM.
IMHO RAM system is efficient when it is used dually.

Baden-Württemberg class

1636614161204.png



Sachsen Class
1636614278132.png

Brandenburg-class frigate​


1636614401928.png

Bremen Class

1636614462541.png


K130 Braunschweig class Corvettes

1636614565547.png



So what should we assume? Need to double Gökdeniz ER!
 
T

Turko

Guest
İf naval constructors could add such helicopter pist , i don't accept excuses:" there is no place on current warships for dual Gökdeniz ER". :))))
1636616002587.png
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,314
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Anmdt Dear why does German Navy love RAM so much?

They haven't put their Millennium CIWS onto their frigates.

Another interesting thing is they replaced VLS with frontal RAM for F125 Baden-Württemberg class.

Last question, is vertical exit of exhaust gas more reliable? Alman fırkateyn ve korvetlerinde baca yerinden tasarruf için mi egzoz çıkışı denize veriliyor?


Look at the examples of dual RAM.
IMHO RAM system is efficient when it is used dually.

Baden-Württemberg class

View attachment 35404


Sachsen Class
View attachment 35405

Brandenburg-class frigate​


View attachment 35406
Bremen Class

View attachment 35407

K130 Braunschweig class Corvettes

View attachment 35408



So what should we assume? Need to double Gökdeniz ER!
When you have money you can do anything.
21 missiles costing nearly a million dollar each , plus the system times 2 , is a good amount of investment on each ship. Never mind the spares!
Hopefully with the new Levent and Gokdeniz ER , local production costs will not be too prohibitive.
GokdenizER will be more suitable for smaller platforms as it is more like SeaRam with 11 missiles. But larger platforms would need Levent.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom