Latest Thread
Not at all feasible.Makes me wonder how feasible a Caspian Sea Bridge would be.
A bridge wouldnt be. an undersea tunnel, however...Makes me wonder how feasible a Caspian Sea Bridge would be.
You do have a point. hope that facility has something like this, so the rail gauge switchover could happen in a smooth, uninterrupted manner.The average sea crossing between Baku and Turkmenbashi is 250 km.
What needs to be done is very simple, the capacities of Kazakhstan Aktau port, Turkmenistan Turkmanbashi port and Azerbaijan Baku port should be increased immediately and the number of these train ferries should be increased. Train transportation capacity between Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan should also increase. On the other hand, the railway line transiting Istanbul needs to be completed.
Before the current investments, Turkiye was still a transportation hub, but the cargo coming from the sea was transferred to the railways and the cargo coming from the railways was then transferred to the road.
It is important to underline here that the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway line is of much greater strategic importance than is commonly believed. Or, to put it more accurately, we are not explaining enough what a historic step this is.
Freight trains from Istanbul and the Mediterranean port of Mersin are brought to the port of Baku, from where they are then transported to Central Asia. The cargoes reach Baku without interruption. Train ferries take the cargo to the opposite shore of the Caspian Sea and continue on their way to Central Asia.
For this purpose, Turkiye's first double-extension rail was laid at Kars Logistics Center in order to eliminate the rail gap difference on the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway and to ensure uninterrupted transportation of freight trains from countries such as Russia, Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan to Europe via TR. As it is known, in countries such as Russia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan on the BTK railway route, rail tracks with a width of 1,520 millimeters are used, while in Turkiye and Europe, rails with 1,435 millimeter standards are used.
After the construction of the BTK line, a bogie transfer station was built in Akhalkalaki. This enabled the loads coming from Europe to go to the geography of the Soviet Union by changing bogies here, but we have attached great importance to one thing from the very beginning, we aimed to bring the Logistics Center in Kars to 2 standards in order to ensure that it can go anywhere in the geography of the Soviet Union by transferring from train to train in Kars. Kars Logistics Center will have both a rail gauge of 1,435 millimeters and a rail gauge of 1,520 millimeters. Thus, trains from both sides will be able to come to Kars and transfer cargo from Kars. Through the Kars Logistics Center, cargoes can now go to Europe as well as Asia and the Far East. In addition, there are 45 thousand tons of grain silos here. Again, the grains coming to our country from China and Kazakhstan can be stocked in 45 thousand tons of grain silos here. Large warehouse investments are also in question.
In this sense, Kars will become the only logistics center and base in Turkiye that can use both standards. After Kars, this line will continue to Kazakhstan and China with 1,520 millimeter rails, and before Kars, it will be able to serve anywhere in Europe up to London with 1,435 millimeter rails. This is a very important advantage, it will enable the uninterrupted transportation of many Railway loads.
***
If you are still in favor of a mega-engineering work in the Caspian that will be the symbol of the Turkic century, my suggestion is not a bridge over the Caspian, but a discussion about bringing the Caspian countries to the Black Sea independently from Russia. Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan's access to open seas independent of Russia and China, can shapes the geopolitics of the entire continent.
Geographically, Uighurs are one of the most distant Turkic communities to me. The loan words of Uyghur Turkish naturally differ from the loan words of Anatolian Turkish because of the intensity of interaction with different cultures. Nevertheless, for a speaker of Istanbul Turkish, the intelligibility is about the same as it would be for someone speaking with nomads living in the Taurus Mountains or Black Sea plateau people migrating from the Caucasus. It is generally above 80%. If you go towards the west, one of the most distant communities is the Gagauz, and again intelligibility is around this level.I am curious, how similar these Turkic languages are? Do guys understand 20% of what others says? 40%?
When was "see your two maps" today's Denmark and Germany ever controlled or ruled over by a Turkic tribe or empire? or Turkic language/religion and culture?
This is incorrect. Mughal ruling class were of Turkic origin, Timur himself was of Turkic origin. Huns are debatable, while they intermixed with Turkic people and have shared heritage, they appear to be a separate steppe peoples. As for the Mongols, there's a reason their conquests used to be referred to Turko-Mongol invasions, a huge part of the various Khans' armies were Turks in addition to Mongols.When was "see your two maps" today's Denmark and Germany ever controlled or ruled over by a Turkic tribe or empire? or Turkic language/religion and culture?
Also e.g. the Mughal Empire, the Timurid Empire, the Hun's and that of Mongol ruled China (Genghis-Kublai Kahn) has no connection towards some assumed Turkic empire - just because Turkic tribesmen of various tribes and locations shared the same language roots and culture and intermixed during the centuries/millennia of raids and conquest with the respective original population of former empires and kingdoms/fiefs - doesn't constitute a Turkic empire.
As such the only real Turkic empire that ever evolved from Turkic occupied conquered territory and effectively displacing previous cultures, tribes, religion and civilizations was the Ottoman Empire.
Agreed - also it seems to be the known issue of Turkic leaders-royal families, holding the power of these Empires and as such wrongly in my opinion leading to referring the entire Empires as being Turkic.....The map is exaggerated, I agree, but you are not correct on those accounts. If anything, Mughal control seems to be the most exaggerated as they never properly controlled the south of the Indian subcontinent as I recall.
You are right, Timurid and Mughal empire are somewhat incorrectly classified as Turkic empires.When was "see your two maps" today's Denmark and Germany ever controlled or ruled over by a Turkic tribe or empire? or Turkic language/religion and culture?
Also e.g. the Mughal Empire, the Timurid Empire, the Hun's and that of Mongol ruled China (Genghis-Kublai Kahn) has no connection towards some assumed Turkic empire - just because Turkic tribesmen of various tribes and locations shared the same language roots and culture and intermixed during the centuries/millennia of raids and conquest with the respective original population of former empires and kingdoms/fiefs - doesn't constitute a Turkic empire.
As such the only real Turkic empire that ever evolved from Turkic occupied conquered territory and effectively displacing previous cultures, tribes, religion and civilizations was the Ottoman Empire.