If Turkey didn't help they wouldn't had been come anywhere near this by themselves.
....you do realise they would 'only' buy more from Israel?
Yes mixed.
Good performances of special forces and drone operators,but poor performances of other conventional forces. Frontal attacks in open fields,many convoys annihilated/ambushed due to lack of air support,reconnaissance,entire group of soldiers sent to their death without any kind of support,lack of effective and combined arms operations.... I could go on.
The main focus of operation was the south,a mostly flat terrain where the Armenians,harassed by drones could hardly hold their positions (They did quite well despite the odds) when reinforcements and supplies were systematically targeted by drones. Azeri forces were bogged down in the north and majority of their assaults thwarted,but the terrain isn't similar though.
Azerbaijan had superiority in every fields and what reduced Armenia's war potential is the drones due to a total control of the air and lack of effective (or used effectively) air defences.
The drones supplied by Israel and Turkey took a great part in your "decisive victory". Otherwise the course of the war could have been even worse for your country.
That's quite a widespread opinion in the West, but nothing is making it 'correct', because the available evidence is explaining a completely different story. Actually,it's amazing how many are deceiving themselves, and how many are entirely unable to analyse this war.
The Armenians built their 'Maginot/Hinderburg Line': a belt of in-depth defences behind which they thought they would be safe. And yes, they were relatively safe: they fortified every dominating peak, each with all-round defences. Because the front of this defence line consisted of 2-5km deep minefields, their strongholds could only get hit by artillery; rarely by direct fire. From these strongholds, Armenians could not only see, but also take under fire Azeri troops as these were still moving into their starting positions, not to talk about approaching Armenian minefields. They could also call-in artillery strikes and guide these precisely. This is why the Azeris suffered most of their losses in tanks.
However, right from the start, Azeris didn't even try a 'frontal attack': instead, they were saturating Armenian strongholds with artilley barrages, while infiltrating the frontline and then searching to encircle, isolate and destroy the strongholds. Was costly because they couldn't cover every such effort with UAVs, 24/7: some of involved units run into ambushes while manoeuvring within and behind the Armenian strongholds, others got hit by flanking counterattacks etc.
Then, once specific strongholds were taken, the Armenian defence line was breached and the Azeris followed-up with mechanised forces to mop-up and secure. This exercise was repeated until they punched all the way through, some 5km, in certain places up to 10km deep.
Armenians then did a mistake at operational level: they were so convinced the Azeris couldn't get through their Maginot/Hinderburg Line, they were shocked when Azeris breached the line in the south - and then failed to establish a new defence line once the south was breached. On the contrary, they launched a counterattack south of Hadrut, which the Azeris smashed. Instead of at least trying to establish a new frontline protecting Hadrut, the Armenians then lost the control: when Azeris infiltrated Hadrut, they run away, enabling Azeris to penetrate the hilly centre of their southern deployment.
Then the Azeris prompted the Armenians into another mistake: they drove west to the Armenian border, and then north to Lachin. The Armenians panicked and reinforced Lachin. Instead of 'frontal attack' on Lachin, the Azeris made a 'step back', re-shuffled their units and launched multiple infiltrations of the Shusha area. Instead of taking the situation seriously, they declared Azeri infiltrations for 'small gangs of saboteurs' and while rushing an entire division to the NKR, deployed the same to reinforce their Maginot/Hinderburg Line - only to have that division smashed by UAVs.
...while Azeris finished their business by taking Susha, threatening Stepanakert/Khankendi and threatening to cut off all the top Armenian units still holding the defence belt in the east.
Now, if anybody feels better by acting that way, call this a 'poor performance of conventional forces' and whatever else. Remain amazed with UAVs and SOFs. But, no UAVs and no SOF could've replaced a wholesale failure of conventional troops - provided there was any. Actually, the Azeris outmanoeuvred the Armenians at operational level, and they outmanoeuvred them at tactical level. Neither is possible with troops 'performing poorly' - especially not in the local terrain.