If BAL is removed from power things will change
I doubt that. Remember BNP bought F-7BG and tried to sell remaining Mig-29 while cancelling the order for more? At this moment i wonder if we can afford 16 JF-17/FC-1 Block 3.
If BAL is removed from power things will change
At this moment i wonder if we can afford 16 JF-17/FC-1 Block 3.
Good thing is, we are not buying anything at this moment.
We will not Buy Jf-17b3 when we can get the better option J-10C for roughly the same price range. Chinese would be able to give us credit on favourable terms for that.At this moment i wonder if we can afford 16 JF-17/FC-1 Block 3.
We will not Buy Jf-17b3 when we can get the better option J-10C for roughly the same price range. Chinese would be able to give us credit on favourable terms for that.
And leave us at the mercy of aggressorsBAF will Wait for eternity if necessary.
nai mama and kana mama argument"MRCA program will be realize and twin engine western fighter will come."
And leave us at the mercy of aggressors
32 JF-17/J-10 + 24/32 F-50/Hurjet MRF
16 EFT will never make any difference against large number of enemy assets and not all of them will be available at the same time.
In the Long term this (Hurjet) is the best option for us. Getting some industrial Co-op would be a great boost in addition to the cost.BD may wait for it or join Turkey in joint manufacture/development.
The vast range of Turkish arsenal (SOM, PGM , Cakir , TRL-230 , Merlin , Peregrine , EW systems to name a few) available for use with this platform is a plus point. Even if say BAF were able to afford the European Equivalents like Meteor or Storm Shadow , will they sell it to us ?Another thing is BAF can only afford small weapon package.
That's not gonna Happen even if BNP is back in power. We can get the much better product (J-10C) , which in some circumstances will be able to hold its own against Rafale. Plus PRC is willing to extend LoC for this.32 JF-17
Will it be integrated to FA-50 ? doesn't seem like the Meteor Can be utilised to its full extent with the kinematic performance of the FA-50.So maybe try getting the aircraft with Meteor
That's not gonna Happen even if BNP is back in power.
Will it be integrated to FA-50 ? doesn't seem like the Meteor Can be utilised to its full extent with the kinematic performance of the FA-50.
Equip Hurjets with Merlin+ Peregrine
and J-10Cs with PL-15E/SD-10 + PL-10
A meteor Launched from a Typhoon going 1.5 Mach at 60,000 ft will travel further than than a meteor launched from an FA-50 at 50,000 ft. The performance of the platform still mattersMeteor launched from a C-130 will still outperform an AIM-120D launced from a Raptor flying at Mach 1.5 in high altitude.
A meteor Launched from a Typhoon going 1.5 Mach at 60,000 ft will travel further than than a meteor launched from an FA-50 at 50,000 ft. The performance of the platform still matters
32x (2x squadrons) would cost at least $2 billions.
Also, there is the issue of American engine with both FA-50 and hurjet.
Even just 16 (1x squadron) would make considerable different (if we can get them) and more than enough to shatter the Myanmar Air Force.
I don't know where you people got the idea that 16 EFT will SHATTER MAF when reality could be different.
Are you sure that meteors will be provided/ approved?Simple, EF trench 4 will see first and shoot first or could easily jam (deceptive jamming or even noise jammong if we can get ECRS MK2) any radar Myanmar AF got on their jet.
The best thing they got is SU-30.
In 2020 Egypt did a test where they put their Rafael against SU-35 and Rafale easily jammed the SU-35's radar.
SU-30 has huge RCS compared to EF.
And its PESA radar's resolution is way worse than CAPTOR-E. (+it can be easily jammed with new gen DASS)
EF would see first and shoot first. And there is no escape from meteor. (+it outranges R-77 by a huge margin)
And in this conversation old mig-29s and JF-17 block 1/2 are children and should not be allowed.
Are you sure that meteors will be provided/ approved?