Latest Thread
T629 is a greedy project that should not be exist.We are not US or China.Why do we have 3 attack helicopter projects at the same time.
T-625 a middle Utility HelicopterSorry guys but may some1 remind me what was the difference between the T-925, T-929, and T-625 again as I completely forgot
Saffet Uyanık says as there are issues with procuring sufficient numbers of engines from Ukraine for T925/T929, T629 development will be accelerated. T925 will be going forward while T929 will be on the backburner.
edit. Deleting the photos as Heartbang also added them.Sorry guys but may some1 remind me what was the difference between the T-925, T-929, and T-625 again as I completely forgot
American mainly AH64 and a few AH1, Russian Ka50/52 Mi-28 Mi24/35,others mainly 1 or 2 type
We will have T129 AH1 T629 T929 attack helicopters.....
Agree. Suffice to say as Phase 3 is scrapped for T129, the 35 options for T129 will be made a reality with T629 so we can expect at least 35 T629s for KKK already.Also IMO the number of T-129 we have in inventory is lacking. Yes it is better than what we had before but still lacking.
We are never going to get an engine from them, there is literally no logical reason to acquire anything from them, especially when it comes to military matters.Do Russians have suitable engines for the T929, perhaps they do.
Both sides are heavily using helicopters heavily in Ukraine right now. KA-52 has been one of the most successful assets Russians use in the war. US military ordered 100 a year or two ago, many other countries also ordered or planning to order new helicopters. It isn't outdated at all, it still has a place on the battlefield.Didn't attack helicopter a outdated weapon system?
And to add, multiple countries are also developing new ones or adding newer capabilities to available platforms. US is procuring new, longer range and faster scout attack helis, making Apaches able to take control of any UAV in the sky with Apache E, Chinese are modifying Z-10, Indians are making the Prachand, Russians made the Ka-52 etc.Both sides are heavily using helicopters heavily in Ukraine right now. KA-52 has been one of the most successful assets Russian uses in the war. US military ordered 100 a year or two ago, many other countries also ordered or planning to order new helicopters. It isn't outdated at all, it still has a place on the battlefield.
In the video, Saffet Uyanık says that T629 will not be a weaponized Gökbey like Korea's LAH . Therefore it is more logical to spend the money , manpower and time on the TS3000 rather than designing a new helicopter .We need to question how logical the idea that we will definetly sell everything we produce to everyone (havada karada) .Just because we have demonstrated this success in the UAV field, it is not a rule that we will definitely make it in the other fields. But some of us seem to be caught up in this guaranteed idea.In any case, we will produce Heavy Class Attack helicopters for KKK.If we can sell it to a few countries at that level, it will be the strawberry on the cake thats all.T-129 license runs out in 2028 which means even if TAI scores more exports they won't be able to sell anymore T-129 from 2028(which is in 4 years btw) unless they agree with Leonardo to extend the license which will most likely cost 8 to 9 figures if not even more, we also don't know if this means TAI won't be able to work on the fuselage at all meaning there is a chance we would need to sit down with the Italians just to upgrade the T-129 fleet in a couple years.. There also have been numerous problems with the Italians as much as everything is potraid sunshiney.
T-129 also has some defiancies such as its feeding mechanism for the turret as the A-129 was never meant to have a turret in the first place. MMW Radars or Satcom can't be placed on the helicopter without restricting its armaments. Also some other points are touched upon in the video such as restrictions for export and other embargos applied on us which is the biggest reason why T-629 seems to have been greenlit over the last few months coupled with performance related demands the revelant parts have been marked.
I also think this move has some parts to do with the fact that we straight up do not have a engine for the T-929 project but we do have a engine for the T-629. It would be slightly larger than the T-129, weigh more (5T vs 6T) and be able to operate under heavier load such as more armaments, MMW Radar, SATCOM etc. Also no embargo threats and no problems when exporting the chopper to another country.
It will share parts with Gökbey which also would make them both a lethal combo in the export market.
Also I do not think that the T-129 will continue to run after 2028 nor do I think will the T-629 arrive earlier than 2028. The goal here is most likely to have a ITAR free chopper that solves the performance related criticism by the user and allows TAI to export it freely to other countries.
There was a proposed Phase-III upgrade that I summarized last year here which then was reported to have been cancelled for some reason. Now I think we know why. Those upgrades will be implemented with T-629 instead of wasting more money on the T-129.
It also can be navalized from the get go and be used by the Navy on Anadolu as well.
There are good reasons for this project. And I for one am happy that it was revived.
TS3000 should have been made a priority. This engine issue will most likely delay the T-929 by years. Which most likely also plays a small part why T-629 was "revived". Now I am interest how they mean to solve the engine issue for the T-925 project though? Maybe divert to American Engines (T701) in the hopes the US will allow it as it will be mainly a transport chopper and not combat? I don't really see any other alternatives. Are there any british engines they could go for? But even if there is won't that be a nightmare leading to re-designing the chopper and just straight up a maintance nightmare for the TSK.
Thanks Putin's stupidity, US now doesn't have to worry about Russia's conventional military, so, they are completely focusing on China and a war in the Pacific, that's why their new helos are heavily focused on speed and range.US is procuring new, longer range and faster scout attack helis,
It was already being designed, albeit not at a breakneck speed, for some time now. Once the license for T-129 runs out, T-629 was always planned to replace it as the light attack helo, as far as I can remember. It's advantage is it will be ours completely, designed for us, and by us, to perfectly fit our needs, instead of making the best of what we can get. It is a necessity and if the engine problems are going to delay T-929/925, it makes sense to pull the project forward a bit.rather than designing a new helicopter
In the video, Saffet Uyanık says that T629 will not be a weaponized Gökbey like Korea's LAH . Therefore it is more logical to spend the money , manpower and time on the TS3000 rather than designing a new helicopter .We need to question how logical the idea that we will definetly sell everything we produce to everyone (havada karada) .Just because we have demonstrated this success in the UAV field, it is not a rule that we will definitely make it in the other fields. But some of us seem to be caught up in this guaranteed idea.In any case, we will produce Heavy Class Attack helicopters for KKK.If we can sell it to a few countries at that level, it will be the strawberry on the cake thats all.
It's all good I'm not offended.If you mean the last part of what I wrote, I wasn't saying it to you there . But there has been a confusion because I only quoted you thats my bad.Also no one said that the main reason for the development of the T-629 are export reasons, that is only on of the reason why it makes sense.Don't be offended but I don't understand the purpose of your post. Did you misread what I wrote?
The fact that certain subsystems are common with Gökbey doesn't mean that the program will not cost a certain amount of manpower and money.The first thing I said was that this program should never have existed in the first place.TAİ shouldn't use its energy in such programs.Also T-629 exists for 4-5 years already it is nothing new. They are not starting from scratch. Also TEI starting development of a TS3000 has nothing to do with TAI working on T-629.
Yes I said the same thing already.I think you don't understand what they mean with "it will share parts with Gökbey". T-629 will and does look nothing like Gökbey. Saffet Uyanik clarifies this in the video as many people misunderstood "Armed version of Gökbey" to mean something like the South Korean LAH.
But that is exactly where you are wrong mate. T-629 is a necessity, we have a limited license for T-129 and our need for light attack helos isn't going to end with it. We need to have a helicopter to fill our needs that completely belongs to us.The first thing I said was that this program should never have existed in the first place.TAİ shouldn't use its energy for such programs.
I won't make a comment such "we have so many UCAVs so attack helicopters are no longer needed " but they took a certain burden that used to be on attack helicopters and F16s in the past.And as far as I know, there are around 83 T129 in inventory.Just because we have a limited license for T129 does not mean that we can not fill our needs with it.Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that KKK should not take its capabilities to the next level.But I don't think we need both Light and Heavy classes separately for this development and I don't find it efficent.Until the T929s arrive, the capabilities we already have are quite sufficient.But that is exactly where you are wrong mate. T-629 is a necessity, we have a limited license for T-129 and our need for light attack helos isn't going to end with it. We need to have a helicopter to fill our needs that completely belongs to us.