Some things are a bit controversial, I can't say that I all agree with the things added with paint on the map. But the whole picture gives an idea of the political landscape of the 17th century. It was one of the peaks of Turkic/Islamic history, but also a century of great opportunities missed, as the picture started to reverse rapidly in the following century.
View attachment 73163
Absolute Monarchies are always tenuous and ticking time bombs as they do not having basic law, rights and dignity cohesively and default applied at the citizen level (i.e its all serfs and subjects to be essentially playthings).
So the quality of the sovereign waxes and wanes, and mostly wanes given what concentrated human power tends to do, especially one in family/dynasty succession format with all its competition at that level compared to what the people ought to have in basic path-hood of equal opportunity (education --->work ethic---->innovation ladders unlocked by that rather than agrarian basis).
i.e its very rarely a hobbesian idyll....then the lack of proper resolution to handle accountability and justice properly to grow long term social trust and investment (which must be secured for any human, social and economic development to take place).
Ataturk learned on the fly and very quickly the importance of the republic and it being secular and progressive (on things like mass basic education) once its security and borders are finally secured and stabilised from wars that came from the brittle tenuous nature he saw firsthand with the progenitor empire. Turkiye benefited immensely from Ataturk.