TR HÜRJET-Advanced Jet Trainer/ Light attack aircraft

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,834
Reactions
8 7,529
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why is the US coloured? It has got T-7A. I don't think that UK should be coloured either. There seems to be an interest in all GCAP countries ordering an M-346 optimised for GCAP training. If not, UK startup company Aeralis could be given the contract for a UK trainer.

Nothing decided for the UK except that a Hawk replacement decision is becoming urgent.
T--7A gets delayed again and again, and Hürjet predecessor was in the same tender back then, so a limited number maybe considered.
Hürjet naval is planned and the UK may want some for their carriers.

A re-engined Hürjet may also open up other possibilities that seem unlikely at the moment.
 
Last edited:

Pokemonte13

Committed member
Messages
157
Reactions
2 156
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
T--7A gets delayed again and again, and Hürjet predecessor was in the same tender back then, so a limited number maybe considered.
Hürjet naval is planned and the UK may want some for their carriers.

A re-engined Hürjet may also open up other possibilities that seems unlikely at the moment.
Uk wanting Hürjet naval is a stretch considering they are currently ordering more f35b for Airforce and Navy but as a simple trainer its possible but i think they wanted to build their own less capable trainer. Perhaps once Baykars engine comes available we will se Hürjet 2 as two engine design (Turkish f18) to replace F16 and be the low cost option for the airforce together Eurofighters and kaan and f16 block 70
40 f16V
40 Eurofighter
150-200 Kaan
100-150 Hürjet 2(Twin engine)
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,834
Reactions
8 7,529
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Uk wanting Hürjet naval is a stretch considering they are currently ordering more f35b for Airforce and Navy but as a simple trainer its possible but i think they wanted to build their own less capable trainer. Perhaps once Baykars engine comes available we will se Hürjet 2 as two engine design (Turkish f18) to replace F16 and be the low cost option for the airforce together Eurofighters and kaan and f16 block 70
40 f16V
40 Eurofighter
150-200 Kaan
100-150 Hürjet 2(Twin engine)

F35B is expensive, Hürjet Naval is affordable, it may have a chance.

Inventory numbers will shape up also considering UCAV fleets.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
786
Reactions
14 1,013
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
The UK might consider a limited amount of Hürjet naval for training purposes.
I don't know about carrier operations but I don't understand how a conventional trainer would be useful to train F-35B pilots on British carriers. I see F-35B landed vertically.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,476
Solutions
1
Reactions
43 15,706
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't know about carrier operations but I don't understand how a conventional trainer would be useful to train F-35B pilots on British carriers. I see F-35B landed vertically.
I think F-35Bs will be retired. It is a failed product. UK will continue with F-35C.
 

TheInsider

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
4,476
Solutions
1
Reactions
43 15,706
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What? UK MoD will buy J-35 before they spend billions and years on converting the carriers to CATOBAR. That's not happening.
I think some kind of EMALS will be installed on QE. It is a miracle to sustain 30-40% readiness with F-35B. F-35B is not a Harrier. It is a failed product; even the US Navy can't maintain them and is fed up with problems and malfunctions. It basically breaks down. F-35C is decent and has a similar readiness rate compared to F-35A.

Hürjet is designed from the ground up to be the trainer for the 5th gen fighters. Hürjet naval can be a great option for the training of F-35C pilots.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,517
Reactions
188 18,023
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
What? UK MoD will buy J-35 before they spend billions and years on converting the carriers to CATOBAR. That's not happening.
I agree with the first part of your sentence.
But both carriers were built with provisions to operate with CATOBAR should the STOVL system proves to be inefficient. It is almost like FFBNW. The construction of the deck, under deck and overall systems are ready to accept the fitting of a catapult and arresting wires. But the cost involved will most likely deter Royal Navy from adapting it. It is not just the conversion of ships’ hardware; But the teams that are needed for the CATOBAR are very special. I remember reading a Royal Navy expert’s view on the subject that these teams are trained for 40 weeks with 50% failure rate before they are chosen as operative teams. And they are continually tested and continuously trained to be at their best as it is an unforgiving job. This is not cheap. Your naval force needs to have deep pockets like US Navy.
Also having only two ships is a big factor as these carriers are also used as LPD and LHDs, both carriers may not have the full complement of jet fighters on board. So keeping crews and equipment for both is a costly process.

According to Royal Navy, the F-35Bs may trade off some range and payload yet they are still an excellent performer for STOVL capability. That provides flexibility and a high sortie rate. Old Harrier pilots have all commented how much easier it is to control and fly the F35B.
Infact some of the non-STOVL specific innovations of the UK’s Naval Air Warfare Centre had come up with, went into the Ford-class carriers to do the same improvements for the USN. UK and MBDA are developing most of their aerial attack munitions with a view to be used by F35B.

Also to be remembered that with F35Bs, turn around times are quicker and sortie rate is higher with STOVL and they can operate in rough seas (e.g. South Atlantic) when CATOBAR aircraft are grounded. Add to this the smaller number of planes deployed from each carrier, the F35B is the ideal choice. That is why Italy now is adopting them, with Spain to follow suit soon. Also Japan is to do the same as they are buying 42 of the B version.

South Korea has dropped their F35B project and have chosen to go along with UAV carrier. With our KE and Anka3 we should follow suit with the South Koreans.
 
Last edited:

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
786
Reactions
14 1,013
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I think F-35Bs will be retired. It is a failed product. UK will continue with F-35C.
I disagree. I think that F-35C would cost at least 3 billion dollars just for conversion to the EMALS catapult system for 2 carriers.

F-35B are used by RN and RAF. The time for the UK to consider what to do with its F-35B would be after the RAF had started receiving GCAP, currently scheduled to start delivery around 10 years from now.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,186
Reactions
102 14,534
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
It is a failed product
Failed products don't get ever growing orders. It's now operated by 3 navies, ordered by Japan and will probably also be ordered by Singapore and by Spain in the future as well. Only non American aligned navies with a carrier not using it will likely be France and Turkey. It is a great platform in a great package with teething issues, like all F-35s. F-35B is a marvel of engineering. It's a 5th gen stealth STOVL fighter, no other like it exists. Harrier couldn't ever do what a contemporary fighter like Mirage 3 could do.

Hürjet naval can be a great option for the training of F-35C pilots
There is only one F-35C operator and it's USN. Their new trainer requirements to replace the T-45 doesn't even include landing to and being operated from carriers. Hürjet is set to compete in that tender with SNC. If pigs start to fly and Hürjet wins, it won't land on an American carrier. We shouldn't expect it would be much different for a future British one.

But both carriers were built with provisions to operate with CATOBAR should the STOVL system proves to be inefficient. It is almost like FFBNW. The construction of the deck, under deck and overall systems are ready to accept the fitting of a catapult and arresting wires. But the cost involved will most likely deter Royal Navy from adapting it. It is not just the conversion of ships’ hardware
QE class ships were originally designed with a possible upgrade to CATOBAR down the line. But, house reports and further studies show that nearly all CATOBAR studies were forgotten about by 2004. It was sold as a minor upgrade worth less than 500M for two ships. Last talks from 2010-12 show it at 2 billion per ship. British armed forces are being forced to choose between upgrading their Trident SLBMs and buying new F-35As due to budget issues. Newly released budget talks for up to 2030 are not any better. They don't have the money for such a program. They will take their F-35Bs, say thank you and be happy that they are even allowed to have them. Their latest studies in that "Project Ark Royal" all came down to operating the Mojave from QE, that's it.
 

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
1,133
Reactions
18 4,836
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Only non American aligned navies with a carrier not using it will likely be France and Turkey.

I would not be so sure about Turkey btw. :)

I think if the F-35 situation is fixed and F-35A are ordered we will see the Navy take the F-35B into realistic consideration for the future MUG.
 

Pokemonte13

Committed member
Messages
157
Reactions
2 156
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I would not be so sure about Turkey btw. :)

I think if the F-35 situation is fixed and F-35A are ordered we will see the Navy take the F-35B into realistic consideration for the future MUG.
I think if we can get f35s than maybe the Americans would be ready to sell us their catapult tech that way navy could order f35C. But depends on the price they offer
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,343
Reactions
48 21,070
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Too much talk about F35.

I agree that UK won't be ordering Hürjet. Just not how they do it.

UK who developed the Harrier are the best to judge whether F35B is failed or not. And like the old Harrier documentary I've shared in the past says. The F35B is insanely easier to use than Harrier.

I believe that with Spain as part of the Hürjet our trainer has a real chance of become something more than a historic moment. Because while we succeed in many things PR and follow through with solid production line on just isn't on a level that would give it justice.

We're not in any good standing with nations around us or anywhere, so let's hope Hürjet doesn't end like a footnote in history due to our governments mistakes.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,834
Reactions
8 7,529
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bro, how's the world tour going? :cool:

From these countries they only buy Hürjet as Qatar (friendly country), Spain (partner).
Those countries are candidate countries that were known to be close to buying or are looking into buying or simply who need to buy a trainer or a light combat aircraft. Simply put their names are cited as candidates for the Korean plane. Not all of them are included, I included them selectively. Otherwise there are like twice as many candidates. If you also factor in the upcoming Baykar engine the list can go to as far as the number of export drone users. So it will be exciting to map them. But this whole thing can take like a decade. So the world tour will be broadcast in seasons and episodes.
 
Last edited:

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,186
Reactions
102 14,534
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
buy Hürjet as Qatar (friendly country)
Qatar operates pretty new Hawks and M346s. Hawks were delivered only few years ago and are based in UK in another joint RAF/Qatar squadron, while the Masters are based in Italy within IFTS. It's a small country with a small air force, they offload a big part of their training to others. They won't order Hürjet anytime soon, they have no need for it.

I wish the IFTS would have materialized in Konya instead, we missed big time there.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
4,834
Reactions
8 7,529
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Qatar operates pretty new Hawks and M346s. Hawks were delivered only few years ago and are based in UK in another joint RAF/Qatar squadron, while the Masters are based in Italy within IFTS. It's a small country with a small air force, they offload a big part of their training to others. They won't order Hürjet anytime soon, they have no need for it.

I wish the IFTS would have materialized in Konya instead, we missed big time there.
Hürjet LCA can be attractive, with Turkish everything.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,186
Reactions
102 14,534
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Hürjet LCA can be attractive, with Turkish everything.
For a country with near infinite money and tiny manpower pool, any kind of small fighter is meaningless. Kaan sure, Hürjet LCA, no way.
 

mTT

Contributor
Messages
728
Reactions
10 1,750
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Those countries are candidate countries that were known to be close to buying or are looking into buying or simply who need to buy a trainer or a light combat aircraft. Simply put their name are cited for candidates for the Korean plane.
Poland, Malaysia, Indonesia have chosen South Korea as their training jet, orders have been placed and deliveries are being made. (The last delivery will be to Poland in 2028)


Qatar operates pretty new Hawks and M346s. Hawks were delivered only few years ago and are based in UK in another joint RAF/Qatar squadron, while the Masters are based in Italy within IFTS. It's a small country with a small air force, they offload a big part of their training to others. They won't order Hürjet anytime soon, they have no need for it.

I wish the IFTS would have materialized in Konya instead, we missed big time there.
Qatar does not order according to its needs, if it orders according to its needs, it does not need to buy airplanes for 20 years.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom