mehmed beg
Contributor
My best friend works with his cousin in Westminster Citizen Advisory Bureau.Do you have any information on this? I would be interested to look into it.
They aren't closest cousins with Sisi but they are related.
My best friend works with his cousin in Westminster Citizen Advisory Bureau.Do you have any information on this? I would be interested to look into it.
Their "armies" were well beefed up by the US most of the time but also by some European countries and even Russia and Israel.It seems that we finally know why the SDF was defeated in such a record time!
Rather than beefing up their armies and buidling proper infrastructure to solidify their rule, they prefered to build luxurious tunnels for s*x harems with underage girls
THAT IS WHY THEY LOST
My best friend works with his cousin in Westminster Citizen Advisory Bureau.
They aren't closest cousins with Sisi but they are related.
Never heard of any of them.I've always suspected that the "media islamists" within england, 5 pillars, dilly hussain, hijab, ali dawah and the like are all potentially state assets. Would you have any information on that circle that could pertain to such things?
Because when you look at what those guys are doing, it only helps the agenda against Muslims.
I don't have particular information some of them but put it this way. After Imran Khan was overthrown, 5 Pillars publishing an article. That article basically was how Pakistani people should destroy Pakistani Army, very similar to the famous Order No 1 after February Revolution 1917. The article was signed alias Iskender Malik.I've always suspected that the "media islamists" within england, 5 pillars, dilly hussain, hijab, ali dawah and the like are all potentially state assets. Would you have any information on that circle that could pertain to such things?
Because when you look at what those guys are doing, it only helps the agenda against Muslims.
I also think that they mainly lost due to cowardice. Syrian Army does not have sophisticated weapons, either. In a similar situation, I think most other terrorist groups would have fought back better. I am trying to explain why it took for us a bit longer in our previous operations. There are several possible explanations. We were overly cautious not to hurt any civilians, and not to take too much risk. Presence of US soldiers also complicated the situation. Indeed, our martyrs were only few. Also our operations were in "core" PKK areas. It is also possible that those PKK fighters willing to fight either got old or already killed. The rest maybe was indulging too much in "worldly pleasures" as indicated above, which weakened their indoctrination. Also most fighting was done by Turkmens there at the time.Their "armies" were well beefed up by the US most of the time but also by some European countries and even Russia and Israel.
So, that's not why they lost.
I could think of countless reasons why they lost but mainly it's cowardice, lack of faith, and when the powers they thought will defend them bail out, they panic and sh1t their pants.
The only "courage" these vermin show is usually against a parking car or when they gang up on a single weak person or setting fire on things in the countries tha took them as refugees and treated them with dignity.
If you want them to respect you, you need to pound the sh1t out of them constantly.
Barzani's proposal to send Peshmerga is openly challenging Türkiye. Barzani clan must be penalized and subjected to the same fate as YPG. We need to somehow undermine the autonomy of kurds in Iraq, working together with Iraq government. Their next project is to unite Iran kurdish regions with that of Iraq. If this happens and an independent state arises, this will still impact us badly. Even if it helps us economically, we shouldn't trade with them. We should have military posts In Iraq as south as possible.
Very good observations. Kurds have all the rights of a Turk. Even in the old days they were elected to the parliament, and became ministers and even presidents. There were only couple of localized uprisings in the past, due to british manipulation, which were supressed a bit harshly, but this was needed actually because the tumult was ongoing and the state existence was in danger. They are overexaggerated somehow, but I think the animosity of kurds to Turks is due to inferiority complex. They were around Zagros mountains thousends of years but couldn't establish any state. We came from central Asia in a storm and established several states and actually civilizations. So that is the reason. That's why they yearn for their own country and most hate us, which is unfortunate.What are the ideas for a long term sustainable solution for the Kurdish population/regions in Turkey? From the statements of Government officials it looks like there is an aggressive push to embrace the local minorities as much as possible. Just saw this post by Ali Yerlikaya:
Its perplexing to me personally why anyone would want to exchange the promise of such a bright future as a citizen of Turkiye, where they have deep roots and integration, for a land-locked garrison state. Does a Kurd in Turkiye feel undermined in their identity and status?
Its a somewhat, but not entirely similar situation to the Pashtuns in Pakistan. Some people in the population are disloyal to the nation, others are very loyal occupying positions as high up as the General staff. Pakistan doesn't have such focused agendas seeking to exacerbate the situation, but Pashtuns are far superior and more resilient fighters than Kurds so even smaller insurgencies can be inelastic to security actions. All in all, the lack of foreign intervention and the non-modernity of the Taliban keeps the situation relatively unthreatening compared to Kurdish seperatism.
Kind of ironic actually, that both countries face such a similar challenge.
Now ask yourself why this problem doesn't exist in Russia.Very good observations. Kurds have all the rights of a Turk. Even in the old days they were elected to the parliament, and became ministers and even presidents. There were only couple of localized uprisings in the past, due to british manipulation, which were supressed a bit harshly, but this was needed actually because the tumult was ongoing and the state existence was in danger. They are overexaggerated somehow, but I think the animosity of kurds to Turks is due to inferiority complex. They were around Zagros mountains thousends of years but couldn't establish any state. We came from central Asia in a storm and established several states and actually civilizations. So that is the reason. That's why they yearn for their own country and most hate us, which is unfortunate.
As a young men in 1990s, I was more tolerant and had friends from all walks of life at the university. From left to right, all the spectrum, as well as some well-off kurdish ones with whom I used to party sometimes. One night we were chatting after some drinks, and one of them said to the other, Hey did you hear what our heroes did the other day? He was referring to PKK terrorists martyring our soldiers. There was really no reason for this animosity. They were getting education in a Turkish university, driving their own cars as a student, partying often here and there, discussing which jeans were cooler Trussardi or Armani, and changing Turkish girl friends every other month.
Great nations are great because they know how to deal with separatists and traitors.Now ask yourself why this problem doesn't exist in Russia.
What are the ideas for a long term sustainable solution for the Kurdish population/regions in Turkey? From the statements of Government officials it looks like there is an aggressive push to embrace the local minorities as much as possible. Just saw this post by Ali Yerlikaya:
Its perplexing to me personally why anyone would want to exchange the promise of such a bright future as a citizen of Turkiye, where they have deep roots and integration, for a land-locked garrison state. Does a Kurd in Turkiye feel undermined in their identity and status?
Its a somewhat, but not entirely similar situation to the Pashtuns in Pakistan. Some people in the population are disloyal to the nation, others are very loyal occupying positions as high up as the General staff. Pakistan doesn't have such focused agendas seeking to exacerbate the situation, but Pashtuns are far superior and more resilient fighters than Kurds so even smaller insurgencies can be inelastic to security actions. All in all, the lack of foreign intervention and the non-modernity of the Taliban keeps the situation relatively unthreatening compared to Kurdish seperatism.
Kind of ironic actually, that both countries face such a similar challenge.
Does that mean they want them to treat minorities like they do?