Live Conflict Military Operations Syria

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,417
Reactions
46 9,587
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I've always suspected that the "media islamists" within england, 5 pillars, dilly hussain, hijab, ali dawah and the like are all potentially state assets. Would you have any information on that circle that could pertain to such things?

Because when you look at what those guys are doing, it only helps the agenda against Muslims.
Never heard of any of them.
Where are they from?
 

mehmed beg

Contributor
Messages
522
Reactions
1 625
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Bosnia & Herzegovina
I've always suspected that the "media islamists" within england, 5 pillars, dilly hussain, hijab, ali dawah and the like are all potentially state assets. Would you have any information on that circle that could pertain to such things?

Because when you look at what those guys are doing, it only helps the agenda against Muslims.
I don't have particular information some of them but put it this way. After Imran Khan was overthrown, 5 Pillars publishing an article. That article basically was how Pakistani people should destroy Pakistani Army, very similar to the famous Order No 1 after February Revolution 1917. The article was signed alias Iskender Malik.
Now , if you watched the film "Man who would be King" , which is basically Masonic film , you will see that it is related to Alexander of Macedonia and their was an actor by the name Malik.
As of other professionals as accounts and particularly solicitors, especially from Indian continent?
Well, I have known plenty of those, that they are mostly druggies, it is obvious. They loved to sniff the white in front of me. Many confessed of being the Masons or ask for advice of joining that shit.
I have had those invitations but for English and Europeans.
Those so called Muslim Preachers , I can recognise them by the way they talk about certain subjects.
I think the only good guy is that English from Oxford, I think his name is Timothy, I forgot his name.
As for purely religious matters, I like Sheykh Hassan Ali , a Bengali gentleman or people related to Deobandis.
As of the group of the late Sheykh Nazim, well I knew that they are government agents. Lieutenant colonel of very distinguished British unit was his mursheed, God forbid, I am not saying that that he or that group ain't Muslims but they are most definitely not of our kind.
By the way I knew Nazim Kubrusi personally.
I don't know if Dr Sidiqui is alive but he wasn't smart, Dr Jakub Zaki, was Iranian assets , very educated but highly arrogant.
As of Shia well , I got a couple offers from them to work for Man in Black and appeal to sort out pedo rapist grandson of very very big shia leader from Iraq.
Most of the Palestinian journalists,who wrote for left wing papers has someone Jewish in their families. Etc etc
To tell you the truth, over the years I get to know many of those faggots. Let alone when I worked for MOD .
Oh yes , I almost forgot. Years ago , there was a Saudi ambassador, that was truly Mumeen , highly moral and intellectual person. He truly loved Muslims. May Allah SWT give him Rahmet
Shahid Bolsen ? Well, it is not even a secret. He killed a German guy in UAE, was sentenced to death and was pardoned , not by the victim family but by government??? Yet , as soon as he publish a video, in 12 hours, he has 50 k views????
In general, Muslims fight for the racial cause, not for religion or homeland or what is truly right.
Bosnians and Turks have no such issues, at least they are not primary.
Example, in the Crimean War , where we were defending our homeland, British and French were with us. The fighting was particularly hard in Bosnian battalions sectors. 1878 ,Ot was Britain who saved Bosnia from Russia etc.
But for Muslims the real Sheykh was that moron Frantz Faon and critical theory Marxists.
Hence, I mostly despise all of that.
Hence I said I am a fascist, that is in lack of Imperial Islamism , which doesn't exist these days. No choice really
 
Last edited:

AlperTunga

Active member
Messages
133
Reactions
2 150
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Turkey
Their "armies" were well beefed up by the US most of the time but also by some European countries and even Russia and Israel.
So, that's not why they lost.
I could think of countless reasons why they lost but mainly it's cowardice, lack of faith, and when the powers they thought will defend them bail out, they panic and sh1t their pants.
The only "courage" these vermin show is usually against a parking car or when they gang up on a single weak person or setting fire on things in the countries tha took them as refugees and treated them with dignity.

If you want them to respect you, you need to pound the sh1t out of them constantly.
I also think that they mainly lost due to cowardice. Syrian Army does not have sophisticated weapons, either. In a similar situation, I think most other terrorist groups would have fought back better. I am trying to explain why it took for us a bit longer in our previous operations. There are several possible explanations. We were overly cautious not to hurt any civilians, and not to take too much risk. Presence of US soldiers also complicated the situation. Indeed, our martyrs were only few. Also our operations were in "core" PKK areas. It is also possible that those PKK fighters willing to fight either got old or already killed. The rest maybe was indulging too much in "worldly pleasures" as indicated above, which weakened their indoctrination.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom