Italy plans new destroyers for 2028 delivery

ANGMAR

Committed member
Moderator
Egypt Moderator
Messages
236
Reactions
526
Nation of residence
Egypt
Nation of origin
Egypt
ROME — Fresh from a burst of shipbuilding spurred by the retirement of old vessels, the Italian Navy is now back at the drawing board to design what it considers the cornerstone of its fleet — new destroyers.
After building 10 FREMM-class frigates — the same type acquired by the United States — as well as designing new 4,500-ton multimission ships, a 33,000-ton landing helicopter dock and new logistics vessels, a risk-reduction study is due to start on two 10,000-ton destroyers dubbed DDX.
“Destroyers are fundamental for a blue water fleet like Italy’s, which must be capable of projecting capability at sea and from the sea while operating across the whole spectrum of maritime and joint operations,” Vice Adm. Aurelio De Carolis, deputy chief of staff of the Italian Navy, told Defense News.
“Apart from carriers, amphibious vessels and submarines, you need destroyers with land strike and task group-protection capabilities,” he added.
The Navy wants the 175-meter-long vessels to replace two aging destroyers, the ITS Durand de la Penne and ITS Mimbelli. Those two vessels entered service in the early 1990s and were joined in service by Italy’s two more recent Horizon-class ships, which the Navy classifies as destroyers.
“We have always had two pairs of destroyers in service, dating back to the 1960s,” De Carolis said.With €4.5 million (U.S. $5.3 million) budgeted so far for two-year feasibility and risk-reduction studies starting early next year, the Navy aims to have a final operational requirement by 2022, sign a construction contract in 2023 — funding permitting — complete the design in 2025, and receive the first ship by 2028
Eq4K6qpXIAARqaC

Current plans envisage vessels that are 24 meters wide with a 9-meter draft and more than 300 crew, while offering a top speed of over 30 knots using the CODOGAL (COmbined Diesel Or Gas And eLectric) propulsion system, De Carolis said. The system allows the use of either gas or diesel turbines, plus electric propulsion for lower speeds.
Italy is renewing its Navy amid the Mediterranean Sea’s shift from a backwater to a tinderbox as Turkey throws its weight around, Libya remains tense after years of conflict and Russia tries to increase its regional influence.
When fully budgeted, the ships likely will be built by Italian state firm Fincantieri, keeping the yard busy after a run of recent naval construction thanks to Italy’s $6.3 billion so-called Naval Law in 2014 that led to the landing helicopter dock (LHD), multimission vessels (PPA) and logistic ship programs.
Equipping the warship
Long-range firepower for the destroyers will be guaranteed by six eight-cell missile launchers for a total of 48 cells, with two launchers toward the bow (ahead of the bridge) and the remainder amidships.
Aster anti-air missiles, already in use on other Italian vessels, will be adopted, as well as a land-strike missile. “The Navy needs a credible land-strike capability and we are considering options now,” De Carolis said.
That could lead the Navy to consider MBDA’s naval variant of the Scalp missile. What is confirmed is the acquisition of the European consortium’s Teseo Mk2 Evolved anti-ship missile, which the admiral said offers “land-strike capability in the littoral.” The weapon will be fired from launchers located immediately behind the bridge, he confirmed.
A rear helicopter deck and hangar will be able to host two Navy EH101 or two SH90 helicopters.
The ship’s cannons will be the same Italian-built types that have become standard issue for Italy’s naval vessels in recent years. A Leonardo 127mm gun at the front of the vessel will fire the firm’s Vulcano guided munitions, while two Leonardo 76mm guns at the center of the vessel will fire the guided Dart munition, again developed by the Italian firm.
A third 76mm gun sits astride the helicopter hangar at the rear of the ship. Dubbed “Sovraponte” and built to be positioned on top of ship structures, the cannon was first developed for the PPA vessels. “We are satisfied with Sovraponte,” the admiral said.
The cannon is one example of how the destroyer will leverage new technologies funded by the Naval Law, with radar another example. The destroyers will mount Leonardo’s Kronos, an active electronically scanned array radar with a fixed face as well as C- and X-band antennas, which are mounted behind panels above the bridge. This technology was used in the two “Full” versions of the seven PPA vessels.
Leonardo will also supply the same rotating L-band long-range radar, to be positioned at the rear of the vessel, which has also been adopted for the LHD Trieste.
The combat management system as well as the communications and electronic warfare suites will be derived from those developed for the newest ships of the fleet, while anti-submarine capabilities will include sonars (both hull-mounted and towed array), torpedo launchers, and decoys.
What’s next?
The Trieste is set to join Italy’s three San Giorgio-class amphibious assault ships to provide a four-strong amphibious fleet, which will require protection, De Caroils said.
“We will need at least two destroyers ready at all times, which means four destroyers in total,” he explained. “The procurement is also part of our commitment to NATO since we are part of a project to stand up new amphibious task forces, each containing three battalion-level landing elements with related combat and combat-service support, which means four amphibious ships and destroyers for protection.
“These destroyers will defend — together with [anti-submarine warfare] frigates, submarines and embarked naval aviation — amphibious naval task groups during their movement towards assault areas, and then provide effective naval fire support for the sustainment of projection and ashore operations carried out by elements of the landing force. All this is required, including the capability to play the crucial role of coordination and control of the airspace over the amphibious objective area.
The U.S. and Russia still operate cruisers, but most other navies today rely on destroyers for fighting power. They must cover anti-air, anti-ship and anti-submarine operations with a focus on integrated air and missile defense, including ballistic missile defense.”
The most “critical task” for destroyers, he added, is protecting carrier battle groups and playing the typical “shotgun role” for carriers. Examples he gave included the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War when the Italian vessel ITS Audace was part of the escort to the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, and during Operation Enduring Freedom in 2002, when the ITS Durand de la Penne escorted the U.S. Navy carriers John C. Stennis and John F. Kennedy.
“Italy cannot do without a balanced Navy covering all operations from blue to green to brown waters and well into the littorals, from minesweeping to submarines and fixed-wing carriers, with overall air protection provided by destroyers and anti-submarine warfare mostly played by frigates,” he added.
https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/11/09/italy-plans-new-destroyers-for-2028-delivery/
 

Cabatli_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,360
Reactions
81 45,455
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
In terms of Firepower, both destroyers will be almost equal and the sensor package is also similar.

TF-2000-Katalog-4.jpg
 

Cabatli_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,360
Reactions
81 45,455
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
is this the tf2000 ?
any translation available ?

64 cell MDAS VLS
16 Atmaca SSM
Gezgin Land Attack VL Cruise Missile
Hisar/G40/Siper SAM missiles
UMR long range, AYR illumination, MFR multi-purpose fixed radars
Fixed IFF antennas
Laser Warning Systems
Laser Electronic Attack system
Genesis Advent net-centric combat management system
Electronic warfare complex
IRST, DIRCM
Fixed sonar, towed low-frequency active sonar
Kalkan decoy launching system
Close-in weapon system
127mm main gun
 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
8,361
Reactions
22 12,853
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
64 cell MDAS VLS
16 Atmaca SSM
Gezgin Land Attack VL Cruise Missile
Hisar/G40/Siper SAM missiles
UMR long range, AYR illumination, MFR multi-purpose fixed radars
Fixed IFF antennas
Laser Warning Systems
Laser Electronic Attack system
Genesis Advent net-centric combat management system
Electronic warfare complex
IRST, DIRCM
Fixed sonar, towed low-frequency active sonar
Kalkan decoy launching system
Close-in weapon system
127mm main gun
just wondering if the VLS could support something like a VL AShM like LRASM??
First_LRASM_Surface_Launch_Test_at_Sea_2.JPG
 

ANGMAR

Committed member
Moderator
Egypt Moderator
Messages
236
Reactions
526
Nation of residence
Egypt
Nation of origin
Egypt
64 cell MDAS VLS
16 Atmaca SSM
Gezgin Land Attack VL Cruise Missile
Hisar/G40/Siper SAM missiles
UMR long range, AYR illumination, MFR multi-purpose fixed radars
Fixed IFF antennas
Laser Warning Systems
Laser Electronic Attack system
Genesis Advent net-centric combat management system
Electronic warfare complex
IRST, DIRCM
Fixed sonar, towed low-frequency active sonar
Kalkan decoy launching system
Close-in weapon system
127mm main gun
so nice most of the systems are turkish
hope to see it on service soon
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,885
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
9 meters of the draft and the nearest vessel is Italian aircraft carrier by 8.7 meters draft. And there will be more than one of these it will require modification at harbors and new dry docks and it will have troubles at ally harbors.
 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
8,361
Reactions
22 12,853
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
9 meters of the draft and the nearest vessel is Italian aircraft carrier by 8.7 meters draft. And there will be more than one of these it will require modification at harbors and new dry docks and it will have troubles at ally harbors.
Must be very heavy ehh?

With all those sensors and weaps, thing is a beast.
 

Azeri441

Well-known member
Messages
309
Reactions
6 1,318
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
In terms of Firepower, both destroyers will be almost equal and the sensor package is also similar.

TF-2000-Katalog-4.jpg

I would say Turkish Frigate or Destroyer is more capable in terms of long range strikes, ability to dedicate more than 16 cells for cruise missiles, not to mention double the anti-ship missiles, not to mention maintaining such capability at 3,000 less tons.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,885
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Must be very heavy ehh?

With all those sensors and weaps, thing is a beast.
It has nearly the same dimensions as other destroyers, just the depth is a lot more.
Not just sensors. I bet she has a great endurance and range. New trend in europe is to make ships eith enormous ranges and endurances which needs less maintenance ,less frequently.
 

ANGMAR

Committed member
Moderator
Egypt Moderator
Messages
236
Reactions
526
Nation of residence
Egypt
Nation of origin
Egypt
It has nearly the same dimensions as other destroyers, just the depth is a lot more.
Not just sensors. I bet she has a great endurance and range. New trend in europe is to make ships eith enormous ranges and endurances which needs less maintenance ,less frequently.
honestly idk why country like italy needs this kind of ships because their operational field is the Mediterranean unless the european want to liberate themselves from the american dependency
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,885
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
honestly idk why country like italy needs this kind of ships because their operational field is the Mediterranean unless the european want to liberate themselves from the american dependency
Almost all europe is inclining towards that, Germany has MKS180.
 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
8,361
Reactions
22 12,853
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
honestly idk why country like italy needs this kind of ships because their operational field is the Mediterranean unless the european want to liberate themselves from the american dependency.
Nope, it's just a trend towards larger ship displacement, might want to remind you that today's corvette such as the Doha class are actually heavier and larger than some ww-2 destroyers.
 

ANGMAR

Committed member
Moderator
Egypt Moderator
Messages
236
Reactions
526
Nation of residence
Egypt
Nation of origin
Egypt
Nope, it's just a trend towards larger ship displacement, might want to remind you that today's corvette such as the Doha class are actually heavier and larger than some ww-2 destroyers.
Lager ships means larger engines and dynamos means larger energy to perform more systems more capable radars and sonars and larger range and sailing time i guess or what will be the point of the large ships anyway
 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
8,361
Reactions
22 12,853
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Lager ships means larger engines and dynamos means larger energy to perform more systems more capable radars and sonars and larger range and sailing time i guess or what will be the point of the large ships anyway
The point of having a large ships is space, more space for additional sensors, weapons, fuel, crew facilities, and stability as well as endurance at high seas.

The Europeans are so peaceful at home now, they could afford to play world police (with the US)…one example is the dispatch of European flotilla in the Hormuz. They'll need those big ships to do this.
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,502
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,885
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Lager ships means larger engines and dynamos means larger energy to perform more systems more capable radars and sonars and larger range and sailing time i guess or what will be the point of the large ships anyway
Range-Autonomous operation for longer time (maybe beyond 6 months without any logistics)-maintenance of carried sensors and systems on the way.
A ship doesn't only carry the sensors and payload,it also carries 150+ people and keeps them alive meanwhile advancing towards a destination, it is not a matter of supplying electrical demand at one instant but carrying enough fuel to supply for a long duration.

Such large ships will have self-maintenance capabilities as well. To prevent from halting operations, these ships will be able to resolve technical issues on their own without interrupting the operations and returning back to the base (unless requires something on propeller-shafting, something major on mast).
The point of having a large ships is space, more space for additional sensors, weapons, fuel, crew facilities
Actually the dimension-wise based on deck area, deck length-width of the ship doesn't vary much from a 7000 tonnes one, what defines the limit on these are usually the available deck (surface) area. So the reason why this ship had more tonnage is related to other factors, amount of fuel-food carried, amount of simultaneous operations to be carried out etc.
64 VLS might be seen less for the tonnage, but for the present deck area the 64 VLS in 48 for AAW + 16 inter-changable for ASuW-ASW has been the standard of the size. We shouldn't forget power of quad-packing for certain kind of missiles.
endurance at high seas.
Not a primary goal but it is a side-objective which is achieved naturally with increase in depth.
but till now nothing compared with those 2
US_Navy_040929-N-0511C-143_The_Ticonderoga-class_guided_missile_cruiser_USS_Lake_Champlain_%28CG_57%29%2C_foreground%2C_and_the_Arleigh_Burke-class_guided_missile_destroyer_USS_Howard_%28DDG_83%29_sit_moored_at_the_pier_in_Fremantle%2C_Austr.jpg
Ticonderoga's are out of this world (sensor-wise, capability-wise, command structure-wise), what is going on inside those ships is far more than what we see at outside.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom