Today AESA radars of modern Navies could detect submarine periscope from 30km so for US Navy radars , detection of such big , large and heavy aircraft would be very easy. US Navy warships would detect it from 70km after that the ecranoplan would be destroyed by 2 ESSM in 50km range.
ESSM is...
Ground effect vehicles are vulnerable against waves. If the sea is calm, Absolutely they will not be more serious threat than cruise missiles.
Large wings are very easy to be detected so there is n advantage. I would prefer slower USV rather than this.
i don't know if it is cheaper than gps...
I was going to share the news. IMO here is the most important thing is nuclear reactors will be small and modular.
Anyways great project.
Imagine we created floating mini nuclear reactor, Incase of earthquakes would be helpful.
Also we could supply with electricity some African countries.
Apart from upper discussion, thanks to AI importance of pilots is reducing.. Today do we still need high skilled pilotage?
You don't need high skilled brilliant brains. Being a pilot getting easier and very soon pilots will be bored in missions while AI fullfil your commands.
Please remember the...
AFAIK even most of frigate warships are not combat operational at 5 seastate. Just survive mode.
@Anmdt
✈️ Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations – Up to What Sea State?
Modern nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (e.g., Nimitz-class, Ford-class – USA):
Typically capable of conducting flight...
Title:
Why the Last Tested Nuclear Weapon Was a Bunker-Buster — Today's Iran Strike Offers Context
---
Post Content:
Many don't realize that the last full-scale nuclear test conducted by the United States — “Divider” — was not just another atomic bomb, but very likely an earth-penetrating...
All credits to me and to our forum!!!
Turkish missile programs should have lessons from last attack.
Title:
Why the Last Tested Nuclear Weapon Was a Bunker-Buster — Today's Iran Strike Offers Context
---
Post Content:
Many don't realize that the last full-scale nuclear test conducted by...
Read it. They mentioned both CEP and impact radius. If CENK had 1000 kg RDX of conventional warhead , its destructive radius could be 300-500meter. Shattering glasses is also considered as destruction?