Latest Thread
atatürk'ün dönemi@Asena_great senin için doğru Türkiye hangi yıllardı?
was forum down (not loading) for a few hours for others? Its back now.
We live rent free in everybody's head
hindu nationalists dont speak for all hindus and indians.
Important to remember.
Indeed I agree same with those isis and aq bastards they dont speak for Muslims.
If only we could get kkk, isis, aq and these hindu nationalists on a island. So they can all just kill each other.
Same with the Jewish supremacists, Christian and Islamist ones too. Throw them all in a island.
Add in the African American israelites too lmaooo
BJP et al. (which contains/allies most of the hindu nationalist factions these days) closest equivalent in Turkish context is something like AKP (and whatever level of Islamist factions it has within it or allied/proxied with etc).
Kind of like Christian Nationalists within the Republican Party in US etc....compared to more normie right wing nationalists or other forms of less toxic (to others in the US) right wing inside GOP.
I mean every (religion based chauvinism, primacy, supremacy etc ) movement like this has its radicalised fringes, but the bulk normies within the larger party mostly have their various complexes and voids and aren't really violent types per se (or existence of the republic's law and order and their affinity for law and order constrains them too).
They do often have selective lens they then use to view modern history and pre-modern history too....rather than a properly objective one. This causes erosive subversion (of the republic, its stress and strain) over enabling of its politics when in power in whichever tier (India has federal vs state to discuss about hedging it....Turkish one is fully centralised in comparison so the hedge comes in municipality/local level etc).
Ataturkists (whom I respect and align with most closely w.r.t Turkish political context) have explained to me over some protracted period of time now, issue they have with AKP etc....given setup of Turkish republic and Ataturk's approach and regard for Secularism to be fundamental principle for it. These mirror lot of similar things in India (founding fathers constitution and then downstream angst/scapegoating of it etc and why).
One great difference is the religion of Islam exists in majority outside Turkiye (so this is problem for Muslim majority countries everywhere regd islamism that competes with their local secular nationalism if they have it..... no one country has the majority of muslims within it, so the various issues cross-over and are imported readily).
Whereas India has something like 90%+ of the worlds Hindus so its Hindutva (equivalent of Islamism) nationalism is vested fully in the country pretty much rather than pushed/pulled from the outside as much.
dictator is the one who has uncontrolable power in lawful manner meanwhile those who have controlable power via unlawful manner are called tyrants, hence erdogan was a dictator since 2017 referandum ! but after 19 mart post modern darbesi and arrest of imamson he is tyrantErdogan is not a dictator but he is an authortarian who wants to be a dictator all but in name.
Same herewhat is the underlying issue causing the website become inaccessible half the time when i try to open it? it's not a recent issue. it's been like this for at least a month. what's the issue?
They keep on attacking the forum,if not Russian then Chinese,American,Indian or British.what is the underlying issue causing the website become inaccessible half the time when i try to open it? it's not a recent issue. it's been like this for at least a month. what's the issue?