TR Navy Navy|News & Discussions

Quasar 

Contributor
Moderator
Messages
920
Reactions
54 4,032
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
G_LX2fFXcAAxw5M

SATCOM ???
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,686
Solutions
2
Reactions
134 26,131
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
G_LX2fFXcAAxw5M

SATCOM ???
Yeah, they have added another one on the rear platform, besides the elevator and there are some small antennas added recently.

Mostlikely, is for drone operations, loosely integrated to TCG Anadolu by Baykar (of course funded through acquisition channels).

So instead of using organic, on-board sensors and datalinks, satcoms; It seems Baykar has been installing their own parallel systems on board.

Specifically that forward position, which is also where Ground Control Station of Baykar is located at, goes through high accelerations and vibrations on high seas (slamming, et al. ). That satcom will hardly survive after an Atlantic and Mediterrenean trip.

There are new additions on the frontside of island, on starboard side and the same pattern exists on the sternside of the island, on the port side.

There are at least 8 new small, and 2 large antennas installed for drone operations, by Baykar.
 
Last edited:

Tornadoss

Experienced member
Messages
1,500
Reactions
5 2,957
Nation of residence
Czechia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yeah, they have added another one on the rear platform, besides the elevator and there are some small antennas added recently.

Mostlikely, is for drone operations, loosely integrated to TCG Anadolu by Baykar (of course funded through acquisition channels).

So instead of using organic, on-board sensors and datalinks, satcoms; It seems Baykar has been installing their own parallel systems on board.

Specifically that forward position, which is also where Ground Control Station of Baykar is located at, goes through high accelerations and vibrations on high seas (slamming, et al. ). That satcom will hardly survive after an Atlantic and Mediterrenean trip.

There are new additions on the frontside of island, on starboard side and the same pattern exists on the sternside of the island, on the port side.

There are at least 8 new small, and 2 large antennas installed for drone operarions, by Baykar.
Why does Baykar insist on installing their own systems?
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,966
Solutions
1
Reactions
36 5,785
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Oh God, please no. Last time MKE attempted to make a 'national' CIWS it ended up in a catastrophy and now they are going for counter-drone, which is technically 'the most cruicial' defense system for ships nowadays.

They will ruin this big time, and get it delayed for a few months and end up witha a 25% functioning system where Navy eventually go to Aselsan / Meteksan for a proper deal and get it done in 5 years. (Alson we shall bear in mind, MKE uses Meteksan radars, but the final integrator is MKE which is the worst of all).

I don't like Ihami Keles personally, he gets his nose into anything possible that is far outside the reach of MKE.

Ships have stabilized cannons, ready and installed. Add two more and get wider coverage, add a decent radar coverage (6 / 8 aura 200G or Meteksan) for proximity defence and use RCWS / CIWS in coordination for USV/UAV defence. Logic dictates expansion of an existing system, not integration of a whole new system through funding development phase, testing phase and filling pockets of few people.

Also logic dictates the final integration should be carried out either by Havelsan, being the CMS and related ship data distribution subcontractor, or Aselsan, being the one who integrates most of the weapon systems and EMI/EMC design, for such a critical system

Anti-Drone is no joke in this century and i hope they won't leave it to few rookies in MKE who outsources most of integration and development, except producing bullets and barrels (yet somehow magically failing at this too) to whomever deals for cheaper.
Also, to get proper coverage, you need a distributed system that is going to cover all approaches to the ship with the same effectiveness, and will perhaps even have some overlap to focus multiple systems in that spot if necessary. What MKE showed is just a bunch of systems of different calibre, well actually they only showed 12.7mm and I think 25mm, on a truck bed. That doesn't make sense on a ship. Put 6 Aselsan Stop, 3 on both sides, give the ship full coverage and let them deal with USVs and UAVs. Put them on sponsons if necessary to give them better coverage and better elevation.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom