Search results

Yes, but it won't really matter that much

Well, not that much

Look at F-22 intakes, nearly exact

No, DSI would make it non Supercruiseable and limit its top speed

From what I have found Twitter posts of Anil Şahin, Kozan Erkan and various others, it does have 2 way datalink

I, I sense some nasty things from your words, MADDOG Also, I hope you can take some photos or get allowed to share some info

I am not really concerned, as the platform which is going to take use of these (TF-2000) is still some years away, hope they can select the f*cking shipyard to build it

You mean, the stuff we want right? Like selling Hürjet :D Also, are you going to TAI tomorrow?

And 120C7 is old Gökdoğan and Bozdoğan are newer than C7

I hope so

3700?

Also possible

From the image here, below his sign and date, there is the number "18". Now you might say we are in 18th of August, and you will be right, but there is already the date over what he is writing. And my guess is, that "18" is about the tender For guys who don't know, Malaysia is planning to buy...

Malaysian king signs a plate of Hürjet, is this a sign?

Nor Northern Syria and list goes on like that

what is not given in this post is modern AESA are LPI and they are made to fade signals with background noise, it is not easy for any syste"m to do: "X has standoff missiles bomb here bam bum badabing! Done!" And for this, you would need hard recon to know where to attack in case of a war, LPI...

Ok so, whats the excuse for F-16V then? i am 99% they wouldnt give F-35s to us even if we didnt buy S-400, S-400 made the process a bit easier for them

He IS the source

TF-X production

Probably time related issues