Search results

It would be pretty high if I was to put them like that and higher positioning of gun means more suspectibility to vibrations.

It is less of a problem for naval ones, if you think about the fact that fewer are produced.

Some upgrade idea for Gökdeniz CIWS with AKREP 200-N aradar because why not having constant 360 degree search/track coverage?

Giving TF-2000 some lively looks

My calculations after we listed the possibilties also correspond to rotax sooooooo...

The ones on tail ain't winglets though, winglets are placed on horizontal surfaces to shrink the tip vortices which reduces the induced drag

By the way, I think I've clarified the whole "Turbo Engine" affair on a mathematical basis TB2 with 100-105 hp engine can hit 222 km/h To hit 300 km/h, you would need a 135+ hp engine, not taking the reduced induc. drag from winglets into account because it is a pain in arse to calculate in...

Not necessarily for SİPER, those datalink antennas are used for naval air defence missiles as a whole. SİPER 1D, HİSAR-D, G/M-1, and GÖKSUR all use this antenna. Besides, those ships still lack adequate searching radar for SİPER, maybe if they get CENK 300-N.

Totally not TEI, PD170 would be kinda large and we would notice Baykar Motor? Likely considering they said they were developing their own thing Rotax? Very likely as they have a turbocharged engine model Either way, I'm sure it will be Baykar's own engine in the end considering how rapidly...

I think it is rather transferred from TB3, instead of will be transferred to They said turbo engine which likely refers to turbocharged. So I think they reused an existing layout to make it quick.

I recall only SİPER B2 and later will require strike-length so yeah, SİPER B1 can be put but usage is a different matter with the unchanged sensor package I guess we could say we have gotten ourselves a mini İstif-class both in looks and functionality

Some highlights: -Larger rocket motor (Near 300 mm arty rockets in size) combined with hybrid rocket propulsion will be a significant leap from the range regime of GLSDB -TOLUN IIR should be backwards (terminologically and quite literally) compatible too but we might have to put some sort of...

I'm sure MITL munitions would work better with HÜRKUŞ, simply because your control is done directly from the launch platform. Many of our competitors can drop laser and GPS guided bombs but I haven't seen one that can use IIR or TV guided munitions.

Changes on HÜRKUŞ II, from IDEX 2025

KORKUT on UAE/South African 8x8

Pretty much modernized ZMA-15 with a few extra sensors and autonomy kit actually

Precision is a step on that road, next thing would be developing an active or passive RF seeker. Or even a multi-mode seeker like PrSM Increment 2's

ASLAN and ZMA-X on snow

possibly GNSS antennas or some sort of inertial measurement units?