Search results

  1. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Anka 3 tanker makes sense for refueling other Anka 3. I did the math for both going a certain way before, refueling one and tanker returning back first, then both second. Main one should I think have 2/3 tank extra fuel when second one has to rbt given external tank is one full internal anka 3 size.
  2. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    You also need to take into account the tanker has to fuel Kaan and make it back itself. And tankers usually refuel multiple times, but lets say even 1 tank full is useful. Regardless, the tanker needs to be many times heavier.
  3. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Kaan's internal fuel tank is larger than entire mtow of anka 3
  4. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    240 Kaan, still 200 F16, several hundred drones of various kinds. I mean it is a huge sum of money, but also a formidable force. My one hope is Kaan may require fewer additional planes to operate by virtue of being so big, like tanker, awacs and jammer for basic missions.
  5. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Well yes but if you build 250 of them you still have to maintain them and hit certain flight hours for every pilot annually. About 200 is good and I think we were down do 150 hours few years back.
  6. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Think like this, fuel cost of 250 KAAN alone is 2 times that of 250 F16
  7. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Those calculations are too old and both KAAN and F35 would end up being way more expensive and difficult to operate than imagined.
  8. U

    TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

    Sounds like a job for drones. Why go backwards?
  9. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    Did you find 600 billion dollars on the ground for next 30 years
  10. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    That should include F16 Özgür
  11. U

    TR Aircraft Carrier & Amphibious Ship Programs

    Article says 32 VLS as well. Interesting but meaningful choice considering lack of A2A fighter. Probably also makes it easier to manage lower number of AD Destroyers.
  12. U

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    Interesting detail about Frigate based air defence system and launcher placement. Looks like Ada class?
  13. U

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    All I hope quadpack is available in next 5 years and say not 10, so like after the batch of 6-7-8 but hopefully before 9-12 are built.
  14. U

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    The decision to keep 16 VLS might mean they are more confident with Sapan block 2 quadpack. But I think even with that it might be worth considering additional launchers, based on Göksur missiles etc. I don't think 3rd set of Istif makes too much sense without modification
  15. U

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    My guess probably just more milden and helicopters for frigates :) (Besides TF2000 immediately )
  16. U

    TR Navy Naval Programs

    Man couldn't they have gone 1 by 1 or waited a little for some of the Hisar and İstif to be delivered
  17. U

    TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

    929 is long forsaken... More importantly we still have same problem for T925 though
  18. U

    TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

    Yes I mean the idea was only first 3 would use foreign engine but it seems first 20 will go same way
  19. U

    TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

    I think this means they decided to procude more with the foreign engine then for initial batch
  20. U

    TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

    TAI will continue making KAAN :) All it means is funding continues coming and scope is becoming more defined

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom