Search results

Subsonic and Supersonic Mius projects are running in parallel. We will see the first flight of Mius in 2023 and probably by 2025 Mius will achieve full operational capability. There is also a twin-engine Mius-C project but info about that is rather low and it probably has a different timeline...

We are trying to be super smart here with the Block 70 procurement and modernization offer. We are pushing the hand of the US. If the US side doesn't accept our offer or congress stops the deal we will have the moral upper hand. We did everything we could now we will implement our solution to...

SM-1, SM-2, ESSM, ESSM-2 has that capability. I don't know if Siper will have that ability but it should have. The engagement is similar to engaging airborne targets. If the missile has an active RF seeker you update the missile with target coordinates until its active RF seeker locks on the...

Naval air defense missiles can be used against surface targets in a secondary role. Air defense missiles are very fast and agile so stopping them is very hard.

Exactly. This is what I'm trying to say.

Big lie. AKP government gave citizenship to 1 million Syrians. This is the real story and this is how the government claims one million Syrians returned to their country.

Wrong engines are included. Some weapons are also included. Nearly all of the sensors are included. Besides it is export price.

That percentage was for the first 4 Milgems where nationalization is lower and weapon and sensor load is a lot better than OPVs. The subsystems and weapons we buy from foreign sources are expensive which makes the hull cost percentage fall down. Lets give an example. Assume that we have 100 TL...

The price for exports is different sometimes we charge double the price for certain products. And we don't build empty Milgem bodies for Ukraine we are building full Milgem bodies without some subsystems.

As far as I know empty hull costs %25-30 of the price.

We will see as always time will tell. This is completely wrong. OPV budget was already planned without those subsystems. Those subsystems were optional(FFBNW) from the start. I know it %100 ask around and you will see. No one can construct 2+8 Milgem based OPV with the weapon and sensor load...

Those are the "minimum requirements" set by TurAF. It means TurAF expects the end product to have at least that much performance otherwise TurAF won't accept the finished product.

My guess is; Medium Range Area/Air Defense Surface to Air Missile. MRADSAM

The latest info I know is the 6+2 configuration. (6 big AAMs+2 small AAMs)

Well, at least it is good news that Aselsan and Roketsan will step up and clear the mess of BMC.

No. In the past, only final purchases is exempted from the tax. Now everything is taxless every single item or service, provided that they will be used for an SSB or MoD project. Turkish subsystems, components, and main products are already very competitive against foreign components without the...

The shit train is on full steam.

Probably Mig-29. According to savunmasanayist LGBs will be integrated into Chengdu F-7BG. This one came as a surprise to me as we have integrated LGBs to Russian fighters of Azerbaijan but never did an integration study on a Chinese fighter. It seems like defense ties with Bangladesh is deeper...

I disagree. The price range of 16x Mk41 VLS is between 35 to 48 million $. The up-to-date price of a single 76mm cannon is 8.2 million euros(9.33 million $). The whole national 76mm cannon development project cost is 4.7 million $ Those two items alone will decrease the price of I class by 20...

Lol seems like after 5 years BMC is ready to come up with something. We will see.