Search results

Depends on where you look, sections are important, at some F-22 will be better and at some TF-X will be better probably, we can't exactly know without running an Ansys sim

This number is possibly outdated now, keep in mind that lots of things were not finalized at that time, i expect it to be better now, around -30 levels

Probably we cannot, we need someone that can model TF-X with all the details and run EMW simulation in Ansys. But -30dBsm means if we apply this to a flat surface that has 1m² RCS for a given direction, it would have 0.001m² with ASELSAN's RAM applied over it. Of course effectiveness...

scattering centers, RCS hotspots

In the latest ASELSAN magazine, there is a small but good info about RAM's When applied to hotspots, it can decrease the RCS by around 1000 times, (-30dBsm) This is a really good amount, i hope it is also easy to maintain and resistant to weather (eg F-35 RAM)

I think we should talk about TF-X sensors, let's start with IR sensors? I wonder about our DAS, EOTS and IRST, as we ATM don't have a comparable product from ASELSAN, so can someone who knows about ASELSAN thermal imaging sensors share them? What to expect for TF-X? Like F-35 EOTS levels...

Israeli can get into Syrian airspace because they got permission form Russia

BÜRFİS would be better

T700 is not enough for Atak-2

What's your source? Because he said that booster version won't be quadpacked

I have got confirmation by Mr.Sunnetci that it is the otherwise

Siper B2 will be quadpacked, it essentially looks like SM-2 and achieves the same range and probably better seeker+ higher G's with the size of ESSM

The whole module is present, ready for deployment

UI looks superb

Looks like every circle stands for 100km,

Not really, it is more about generator than the engine

Holy that AESA mount, will be a beast for sure

Cmon already share the goddamn photo

Today?

Noice, glad to hear that we are going with IR