Search results

We want also unmanned Hürkuş-C!!!! I adore Unmanned Hürjet 😍 Great work 🙏.

Do Today's Armies need "The use of aircraft in the close air support of ground forces"? İf the answer is yes , next question which type of aircraft could fulfill this role? Manned Attack helicopters? Manned light attack aircrafts? Unmanned drones...

But how could we save MAVİ VATAN while our limited frigates would have to secure our Aircraft Carrier around the Africa or somewhere else?

So what are you suggesting?

The Egean Sea consists of Islands, also Cyprus is an island. Need to chase them .So you couldn't just send land based ATMACAs over enemy warships. TN need frigates,MPACs etc. And what about Mavi Vatan which reaches to Libya? How to fight around Crite Island. Do you need land based ATMACA or FAC...

So Aircrafts are absolute!!!

I think ANKA-3 is not agile so Acceleration, rate of climb are important for light attack aircraft,i agree.. but: Does unmanned or manned Hürkuş-C need such a rapid speed for their duties? (while manned Hürkuş cruise speed 350kmh, also unmanned ANKA-3 cruise speed will be around 350-400kmh. )...

Hürkuş max speed is 550km/h

Please don't take it personal. We are not saying "Before AC , first we should build 100 frigates then 20 destroyers then time for AC like PLAN" We would agree the size of Royal Navy surface fleet. But our Navy fleet is really poor. İnstead of AC , If President of Türkiye offered building 3...

Ok. Let's make CN-235 unmanned Cargo Plane:) we want making something unmanned here:p Let's wait ANKA4/5

First: Not Sacrificing crew of Hürkuş while using Hürkuş C capabilities. KE is expensive more advanced. Kinda comparing manned F-16 with manned Hürkuş -C Regarding ANKA-3 you might seem right but Hürkuş -C is for totally missions different from ANKA-3. Anka-3 kinda unmanned F117. Where could...

Presidential Office revealed the Russian strategy at this stage of the war “Russia’s strategy at this stage of the war is absolutely clear and transparent... To provoke on a large scale any hotbeds of tension, any escalations, any conflicts in different parts of the world in order to divert...

I quit because i already said. Attığın taş vurduğun kuşa değecek mi? TN has to deal with real other priorities and limited financial resources. Show us more Milgems:)

Forget about Asia. PRC and India wouldn't allow. You might be right about Africa. AC might be used for interests about Africa. But for Mediterranean conflicts having AC is absolutely too much risky. Edit: waste of source. İt's a kinda : giving UMTAS ATGM or SUNGUR MANPADS to police officer.

So Aircraft Carriers are not the best tool for saving national interest.

But Could French AC have attacked on Türkiye, or The French AC wasn't an easy target for TN and TurAF? İt was just a show without a profit. French AC could not scare Türkiye. Türkiye anasını sikerdi istese o ACnin. Rezil olurlardı. I would prefer investing in nuclear powered submarines rather...

IMO without AC we could defend our EEZ in the Mediterranean and in the Egean sea. We Just need more quantity of modern frigates. İf you have interests with Africa and east Asia , Submarines with ballistic missiles would be more effective and lethal. For us There is no need making DRAGON WALK...

The countries that have AC also have great nuclear deterrence. Noone could dare attacking USN, RN, FN,PLAN and Indian Navy thank to nuclear weapons. We could use AC against just small African tribes that wouldn't have Antiship capabilities. On the other hand, until Turkish AC is comissioned...

If our projects were bound to just one person, we were doomed. Behind the scene a load of talented organizations.

Still usable: expert talks about ATACMS The United States may dispose of ATACMS missiles that Ukraine needs Disposal of missiles requires money; it is easier to transfer them to Ukraine and dispose of them on the battlefield.