Search results

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/06/us/politics/trump-turkey-f35.html

Exactly. It's only the ambassador to the US but going from "we control America" to "they do what they need to do" type of talks is a huge difference.

Yechiel Leiter, Israeli Ambassador to the US:

This thread is dedicated to news from the 2026 NATO Summit in Ankara.

Rutte said tens of billions worth of new contracts will be announced tomorrow. Do you think we need a thread for the summit? It's kind of a defence fair.

Thanks for the information. Espacially about the original and current plans.

@TheInsider Is it possible for us to see Kaan P1 flying before the NATO summit ends? If you know anything that we shouldn't know, please keep it to yourself. All I want to know is if it's off the table or not.

No I mean why doesn't the German use two of the same barrels. Their system has 1000 rpm capacity. Why not make it 2000?

There's one thing I want to know why. Skyranger has 1×1000. Gökdeniz has 2×550. Göker is also single barrel. What's the reason behind 1000-1200 rpm numbers? Why not 2×1000?

Well, at this point all I can say is what you ask for will be in SAHA 2027

Thanks for the information. With the reframing of my -now better- ballistic knowledge, my point stays the same. Such a weapon system could be useful to surpass advanced ABM systems. It's good to have, if we really have it, of course.

So a ballistic missile always depletes its fuel, independent of the distance to the target. And still it will have higher terminal velocity because of the approach pattern. Do I get it right?

Not that I think it happened that way but talking about the possibilities to why: 1) Money (because why not) 2) we do not and will not be a threat to China. 3) not blocking the way in their goals in Africa in exchange. 4) if a full scale Pakistan-India war starts, us having enough range is...

You get the concept. TAF will decide the variety. All has their own uses.

A ballistic missile with 3000km range can only hit its targets at low-mid-supersonic speeds because its engines will be shut off mid flight. A 6000km range ballistic missile can still have enough fuel allowing it to be high-supersonic or low-hypersonic in the terminal phase for the same range...

I'm sure I saw it being translated like this before. Even tho It's not valid according to TDK.

I think we can all relate to Güçhan but YıldırımHan is more of a question mark for me. If 1) they got know-how from Roketsan and Delta-V 2) they have engineers from those companies 3) it is being worked on since Yıldırım projects started. That could be something real. No need to mention these...

3 tons of explosive for YILDIRIMHAN

There is no way these are mature projects right? Because.. damn....

But not that they didn't want to have an aircraft carrier, right? I'm not saying it was logical for the Nazis to have one, but they intended to.