“Valla balına dünya lideri olduk amk”View attachment 64229
taraya taraya bonba adarak gedecek
Latest Thread
“Valla balına dünya lideri olduk amk”View attachment 64229
taraya taraya bonba adarak gedecek
My point was clear there, I am not speaking literally.That is a bit exaggeration. They do national anthems and flags. Although they don't have any figure like Ataturk in recent history.
That is a bit exaggeration. They do have national anthems and flags. Although they don't have any figure like Ataturk in recent history.
LOLChant of the Saudi Nation - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Turns out, they don't actually have anthem made by their own but gifted in 1950s, and no lyrics until 1980s.
There are things in the Turkish people that go beyond rivalry or enmity. The Arabs have/had to learn this the hard way; you don't have a flag, an anthem or Atatürk, and you won't comprehend or have any of these.
And i am not buying an Arab's words, sorry for that. As far as i have read they have not permitted Anthem earlier but that was 'negotiated'. I can't accept that a Country's motto 'Yurtta sulh, Cihanda sulh' is interpreted as political figure.It is becoming a circus that people are saying the anthem was banned, they banned pictures and banners and uniforms depicting Atatürk and this is not a foreign policy issue, it is an internal political football.
While I disagree with this, Saudia Arabia has not allowed posters or pictures depicting leaders as a show of politics at their football stadiums previously as far as I can tell from a quick Google.
That this dives straight into Turkish/Arab emnity on social media is just telling me that there are problems at home. The two football teams must have known about this in advance, why play a Turkish cup abroad? Money .
This is just the drama of the week to distract from more important problems.
And i am not buying an Arab's words, sorry for that. As far as i have read they have not permitted Anthem earlier but that was 'negotiated'. I can't accept that a Country's motto 'Yurtta sulh, Cihanda sulh' is interpreted as political figure.
Peace at home, peace in the world - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
It is becoming a circus that people are saying the anthem was banned, they banned pictures and banners and uniforms depicting Atatürk and this is not a foreign policy issue, it is an internal political football.
While I disagree with this, Saudia Arabia has not allowed posters or pictures depicting leaders as a show of politics at their football stadiums previously as far as I can tell from a quick Google.
That this dives straight into Turkish/Arab emnity on social media is just telling me that there are problems at home. The two football teams must have known about this in advance, why play a Turkish cup abroad? Money .
This is just the drama of the week to distract from more important problems.
Also lol
I haven't been able to find a source on the anthem thing. I think it's fiction because it sounds so unlikely. Banning an anthem?
This seems to be the crux of it. Stupid for hosting the game outside of TR, stupid for thinking the game wouldn't include politics, especially on the centennial.