A dilemma for Pakistan as UAE cuts off work visas

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,768
Reactions
119 19,794
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
I'd call it more than a dilemma given the balance sheet...but I guess let's see... @Saithan @VCheng @Saiyan0321


A dilemma for Pakistan as UAE cuts off work visas

ADNAN AAMIR

A vital source of employment and income has been severed after Pakistan ran afoul of its powerful benefactors.

For the struggling economy of Pakistan, foreign remittances from expatriates are lifesavers, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is country’s second-largest source of remittances. In the last five years, 1.3 million Pakistanis have found jobs in the UAE. In 2019 alone, Pakistani expatriates in UAE sent more than US$5 billion (A$6.725 billion) back home.

A changing geopolitical scenario, however, could result in the drying up of this source of financial support for Pakistan.

On 18 November, UAE banned the issue of work visas to Pakistanis, along with the nationals of a few other Muslim countries. Initially, Pakistan’s Foreign Office claimed the ban was due to Covid-19. However, India has more Covid-19 cases per capita than Pakistan, but no ban was imposed on visas for Indian nationals. A week later, it was revealed that the visa ban was due to security reasons and not Covid-19.

Political pundits quickly attributed the UAE decision to Pakistan’s latest foreign policy flip-flops, which have angered Gulf states.

UAE is a country essentially run by expatriates – out of a total population of 9.8 million, 90% are expatriates. Indians make up the largest foreign nationality in UAE, with a population of 2.6 million, followed by 1.2 million Pakistanis, 700,000 Bangladeshis, and over half a million Filipinos.

But now that new aspirants from Pakistan cannot get work visas for UAE, and many have already returned home due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the number of Pakistani expatriates in UAE will fall sharply.

What will Pakistan lose, economically? The second-largest source of its foreign remittances. In the month of October alone, before the visa ban, Pakistanis sent $504 million back home from UAE. At this average, Pakistan could have received foreign remittances of $6 billion from UAE in fiscal year 2020–21, which it now will not get.

These numbers are significant for Pakistan’s economy, because the total foreign exchange reserves of the country stand at over $20 billion. The current account deficit is $160 million and the balance of trade stands at a deficit of $17 billion. This means that Pakistan badly needs foreign currency to pay for its import bills, most notably oil.

Besides, Pakistan’s ailing economy has no employment opportunities for people who would otherwise have found work in the UAE. This will not only keep the unemployment rate high, but will also increase political pressure on Pakistan’s government to create jobs. Therefore, the UAE visa ban will cost Pakistan’s economy dearly.

Further adding salt to the wound is that jobs lost by Pakistan in UAE are apparently going to Indian nationals. Pakistani media has reported that one recruitment agency in Rawalpindi city alone lost 3000 jobs in UAE which were filled by its Indian competitor. This is just one case, and many such instances are expected in the coming months. Former Senator Enver Baig, who runs a recruitment agency, told the media that Pakistan is losing 800 to 1000 jobs per day in UAE, and India is benefitting from the loss.

So why has UAE banned the issue of work visas to a fellow Islamic country? The answer lies in the Pakistani government’s foreign policy decisions, which have irked the Gulf monarchies. Pakistan has aligned itself with the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc in the Muslim world, which is challenging Saudi Arabia’s leadership. In December 2019, Saudi Arabia and its closest ally UAE strong-armed Pakistan out of the Kuala Lumpur Summit, organised by the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc, using the threat of economic sanctions.

During the last 12 months, further rifts developed between Islamabad and the Gulf states, reaching their lowest point when Pakistan’s Foreign Minister strongly criticised Gulf states for not supporting Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir. Subsequently, Saudi Arabia demanded Pakistan repay its loans, cancelled investment commitments of $20 billion in Pakistan, and also asked its ally UAE to choke Pakistan economically by suspending work visas to its citizens.

This scenario has left Pakistan with limited options to salvage the situation. UAE rulers will soon be in Pakistan on their annual hunting trip. Pakistan’s government officials are under pressure to meet UAE rulers during their visit and request they suspend the visa ban.

Such a move is unlikely to work: UAE has made a calculated decision, most likely on the advice of Saudi Arabia, and will not reverse it merely on the request of Pakistani leadership.

This leaves Pakistan in the uncomfortable dilemma of recalibrating its foreign policy entirely – meaning it has to withdraw its support for the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc. Pakistan’s government is finding out that it cannot make independent foreign policy decisions against countries on which it is economically dependent. The prudent approach would be to align itself diplomatically with countries from which it gets economic benefits (i.e., Gulf states), as opposed to the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc, which has little to offer Pakistan’s economy.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,640
Reactions
37 19,749
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
I'd call it more than a dilemma given the balance sheet...but I guess let's see... @Saithan @VCheng @Saiyan0321


A dilemma for Pakistan as UAE cuts off work visas

ADNAN AAMIR

A vital source of employment and income has been severed after Pakistan ran afoul of its powerful benefactors.

For the struggling economy of Pakistan, foreign remittances from expatriates are lifesavers, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is country’s second-largest source of remittances. In the last five years, 1.3 million Pakistanis have found jobs in the UAE. In 2019 alone, Pakistani expatriates in UAE sent more than US$5 billion (A$6.725 billion) back home.

A changing geopolitical scenario, however, could result in the drying up of this source of financial support for Pakistan.

On 18 November, UAE banned the issue of work visas to Pakistanis, along with the nationals of a few other Muslim countries. Initially, Pakistan’s Foreign Office claimed the ban was due to Covid-19. However, India has more Covid-19 cases per capita than Pakistan, but no ban was imposed on visas for Indian nationals. A week later, it was revealed that the visa ban was due to security reasons and not Covid-19.

Political pundits quickly attributed the UAE decision to Pakistan’s latest foreign policy flip-flops, which have angered Gulf states.

UAE is a country essentially run by expatriates – out of a total population of 9.8 million, 90% are expatriates. Indians make up the largest foreign nationality in UAE, with a population of 2.6 million, followed by 1.2 million Pakistanis, 700,000 Bangladeshis, and over half a million Filipinos.

But now that new aspirants from Pakistan cannot get work visas for UAE, and many have already returned home due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the number of Pakistani expatriates in UAE will fall sharply.

What will Pakistan lose, economically? The second-largest source of its foreign remittances. In the month of October alone, before the visa ban, Pakistanis sent $504 million back home from UAE. At this average, Pakistan could have received foreign remittances of $6 billion from UAE in fiscal year 2020–21, which it now will not get.

These numbers are significant for Pakistan’s economy, because the total foreign exchange reserves of the country stand at over $20 billion. The current account deficit is $160 million and the balance of trade stands at a deficit of $17 billion. This means that Pakistan badly needs foreign currency to pay for its import bills, most notably oil.

Besides, Pakistan’s ailing economy has no employment opportunities for people who would otherwise have found work in the UAE. This will not only keep the unemployment rate high, but will also increase political pressure on Pakistan’s government to create jobs. Therefore, the UAE visa ban will cost Pakistan’s economy dearly.

Further adding salt to the wound is that jobs lost by Pakistan in UAE are apparently going to Indian nationals. Pakistani media has reported that one recruitment agency in Rawalpindi city alone lost 3000 jobs in UAE which were filled by its Indian competitor. This is just one case, and many such instances are expected in the coming months. Former Senator Enver Baig, who runs a recruitment agency, told the media that Pakistan is losing 800 to 1000 jobs per day in UAE, and India is benefitting from the loss.

So why has UAE banned the issue of work visas to a fellow Islamic country? The answer lies in the Pakistani government’s foreign policy decisions, which have irked the Gulf monarchies. Pakistan has aligned itself with the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc in the Muslim world, which is challenging Saudi Arabia’s leadership. In December 2019, Saudi Arabia and its closest ally UAE strong-armed Pakistan out of the Kuala Lumpur Summit, organised by the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc, using the threat of economic sanctions.

During the last 12 months, further rifts developed between Islamabad and the Gulf states, reaching their lowest point when Pakistan’s Foreign Minister strongly criticised Gulf states for not supporting Pakistan on the issue of Kashmir. Subsequently, Saudi Arabia demanded Pakistan repay its loans, cancelled investment commitments of $20 billion in Pakistan, and also asked its ally UAE to choke Pakistan economically by suspending work visas to its citizens.

This scenario has left Pakistan with limited options to salvage the situation. UAE rulers will soon be in Pakistan on their annual hunting trip. Pakistan’s government officials are under pressure to meet UAE rulers during their visit and request they suspend the visa ban.

Such a move is unlikely to work: UAE has made a calculated decision, most likely on the advice of Saudi Arabia, and will not reverse it merely on the request of Pakistani leadership.

This leaves Pakistan in the uncomfortable dilemma of recalibrating its foreign policy entirely – meaning it has to withdraw its support for the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc. Pakistan’s government is finding out that it cannot make independent foreign policy decisions against countries on which it is economically dependent. The prudent approach would be to align itself diplomatically with countries from which it gets economic benefits (i.e., Gulf states), as opposed to the Turkey-Iran-Malaysia bloc, which has little to offer Pakistan’s economy.
There is no doubt that nationals abroad is an important investment source for developing countries. Look at Philippines in this regard as their contribution to national economy is way bigger than in Pakistan.

It'll hurt Pakistan, but the question is what is Pakistan going to about it ?

How many factories and NEW jobs has been created in Pakistan in the past year those are important indicators on whether Pakistan is/will be able to slowly escape from the claws of the arab peninsula.

Does Pakistan have any strategy to make the country attractive for investments, apart from natural resources.

One of the tools governments have are the establishment of economic free zones/tax incentives to attract investments that'll create jobs.

Let's assume that Pakistan reduces Foreign Corporate tax to nill, do they have the necessary infrastructure to attract these firms ?

Educational level is also important in this regard. Does Pakistan have enough workforce on different levels. Vocational school etc..

At the end of the day it all boils down to how much has Pakistan improved the infrastructure, if a country's infrastructure is solid and your people are entrepreneurs they'll find ways to survive, and rise above.

That is an important aspect of governance to make the investments and give people the opportunity to pave their own path.

I'm not going to get into the harsh working conditions as a foreign worker in the Arab peninsula for quite a meagre salary.
 

VCheng

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
488
Reactions
537
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Pakistan
I'd call it more than a dilemma given the balance sheet...but I guess let's see... @Saithan @VCheng @Saiyan0321

I agree that this is more than a dilemma. The entire ME will be remade in the next few years, and with the added changes related to the decline of oil as a worldwide energy source, things can become very difficult for Pakistan generally, and for its balance of payments specifically.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,768
Reactions
119 19,794
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
There is no doubt that nationals abroad is an important investment source for developing countries. Look at Philippines in this regard as their contribution to national economy is way bigger than in Pakistan.

It'll hurt Pakistan, but the question is what is Pakistan going to about it ?

How many factories and NEW jobs has been created in Pakistan in the past year those are important indicators on whether Pakistan is/will be able to slowly escape from the claws of the arab peninsula.

Does Pakistan have any strategy to make the country attractive for investments, apart from natural resources.

One of the tools governments have are the establishment of economic free zones/tax incentives to attract investments that'll create jobs.

Let's assume that Pakistan reduces Foreign Corporate tax to nill, do they have the necessary infrastructure to attract these firms ?

Educational level is also important in this regard. Does Pakistan have enough workforce on different levels. Vocational school etc..

At the end of the day it all boils down to how much has Pakistan improved the infrastructure, if a country's infrastructure is solid and your people are entrepreneurs they'll find ways to survive, and rise above.

That is an important aspect of governance to make the investments and give people the opportunity to pave their own path.

I'm not going to get into the harsh working conditions as a foreign worker in the Arab peninsula for quite a meagre salary.

All important questions for the Pakistani administration to have figured out before getting into too many geopolitical messes. I guess lets see, I am not optimistic they have much idea what they are doing...kind of throw things (as emotions dictate) at dart board and see what sticks and pick those numbers for the lottery on TV...repeat and rinse.

The problem is their savings/investment rate being single digit. I also used to think its matter of policy that needs reforming and then build more reform on top of it. I know better now, its being deliberately kept that low.

Growing businesses and corporate sector means less overarching control to current status-quo folks, i.e people might get wrong ideas and ask wrong questions and apply wrong pressures (unwittingly even) with time when you do actual deep policy change to get liquidity locked and invested (into meaningful capital) for breakout.

Making it black and white issue that only China can do this for you (because China has done so for itself) is far simpler thing to put on brochure.

I agree that this is more than a dilemma. The entire ME will be remade in the next few years, and with the added changes related to the decline of oil as a worldwide energy source, things can become very difficult for Pakistan generally, and for its balance of payments specifically.

Pakistan admin for some reason is working on ruining even more relations with countries they really shouldn't be at this juncture (given Pakistan economy).

Take this for example:


Like surely the generals figured out if Nawaz Sharif was allowed to leave (to anywhere), he most likely wouldnt be returning....so why allow for him to leave if that was the real issue?

If it was all factored in (him not returning), why start this with the UK now...as though the UK wouldn't respond with time now (and where it can really hurt).

It almost seems this was all purposely done to start more drama for deflection and chest thumping and gotchas and counter-gotchas....stuff thats fun when you are in some palatial mansion and don't have to figure out where you familys next meal is coming from.

Either that or a deliberate attempt to add sourness to relations with the UK, and taunt the UK to take stringent measures back? So Pakistan can get even more cosy and all-in with PRC? Generals love other generals and all that.

UK can do significant harm to Pakistan's economy just like the Gulf can if push comes to shove (like it already is in UAE case). Does any of this factor through to the khaki goose-steppin baton twirlers? Actually don't bother answering, I already know it doesn't.

Awful. My sympathies to the aam admi of Pakistan.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,950
Reactions
5 4,146
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The should start riots or revolt. 2 mio UAE against 9 mio foreigners.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,768
Reactions
119 19,794
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
The should start riots or revolt. 2 mio UAE against 9 mio foreigners.

Why? This is affecting the 1.2 million pakistanis only.

The rest 8 million or so others (Indians, bangladeshis, filipinos etc) stand to benefit....in fact India already benefitting according to the article.
 

Deliorman

Contributor
Messages
977
Reactions
9 3,956
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Bulgaria
A country of 220 million people that has a lot of unexplored natural resources, with access to the world ocean and directly bordering billions of people. A country that has quite a big diaspora all around the English speaking world too where you can find many educated and successful people too which is also a big asset. Much of the elite of the state is educated in Britain etc... yet Pakistan is dependent on exporting slaves to the Gulf where they can serve the spoiled Sheikhs for peanuts.

It’s sad that a country with such a huge potential for economic growth is in such a bad state... It should be absolutely booming.
 

VCheng

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
488
Reactions
537
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Pakistan
A country of 220 million people that has a lot of unexplored natural resources, with access to the world ocean and directly bordering billions of people. A country that has quite a big diaspora all around the English speaking world too where you can find many educated and successful people too which is also a big asset. Much of the elite of the state is educated in Britain etc... yet Pakistan is dependent on exporting slaves to the Gulf where they can serve the spoiled Sheikhs for peanuts.

It’s sad that a country with such a huge potential for economic growth is in such a bad state... It should be absolutely booming.

The system is designed to achieve the results that are wanted precisely.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,768
Reactions
119 19,794
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
A country of 220 million people that has a lot of unexplored natural resources, with access to the world ocean and directly bordering billions of people. A country that has quite a big diaspora all around the English speaking world too where you can find many educated and successful people too which is also a big asset. Much of the elite of the state is educated in Britain etc... yet Pakistan is dependent on exporting slaves to the Gulf where they can serve the spoiled Sheikhs for peanuts.

It’s sad that a country with such a huge potential for economic growth is in such a bad state... It should be absolutely booming.

Core answer here:
The problem is their savings/investment rate being single digit. I also used to think its matter of policy that needs reforming and then build more reform on top of it. I know better now, its being deliberately kept that low.

This is the basic lever that needs changing internally (savings as % of GDP)...i.e convincing everyone with big or little means (since these all add up) to forego consumption and pool their money for a mid and long term breakout.

This is the ONLY way a consumption-based, high-pop, low-income country can put in factories and the likes and figure things out in those areas for itself and learn, optimise, improve and get more etc.

There is no way to re-invent this particular wheel...zilch.

But it all needs trust in the system to do. The Pakistani people essentially have single digit % trust (7% savings rate) in their system at best....when they have to actually put money where the (system's) mouth is.

This is precisely why CPEC will have little impact too (for Pakistan people in the end).

There is reason why China gets all "meh" and/or "MOU brochures are glossy! lookie!" when you get to the actual production + factory details of the plan. Its all a logistics+debt program (putting cart well before absconding donkey) to make sure Pakistan stays chained for good (if the donkey does ever show up to the cart) in the current system for all status-quo folks to benefit at cost of all others. Suits power brokers on both sides, and thats all that matters.

That has always been the trend since inception of this country....to a more severe degree and impact than developing countries at large.

It will need a deep revolution to fix.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom