TR Air Forces|News & Discussion

hawk21

Active member
Messages
29
Reactions
3 108
Nation of residence
Malaysia
Nation of origin
Malaysia
I have a question:

Let's say the procurement budget of TurAF for the next 20 years is $X Billion dollars. Out of this:

$ 20 billion goes to F-16V
$ 7-10 billion for Eurofighters
$ 7-10 billion for F-35s

How much will be left to complete the development of TFX and its engine after you have taken out some 40 billion dollars from your procurement budget and spent it on not one but 3 different combat aircraft?

Even if you could somehow do all of this, how many TFX are you gonna be able to actually procure with whatever is left?

At this point, I'm starting to believe that buying anything other than F-16 kits creates an unacceptable financial risk for the TFX.

Maybe that is the intent here.
 

Bozan

Experienced member
Messages
1,518
Reactions
5 1,844
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have a question:

Let's say the procurement budget of TurAF for the next 20 years is $X Billion dollars. Out of this:

$ 20 billion goes to F-16V
$ 7-10 billion for Eurofighters
$ 7-10 billion for F-35s

How much will be left to complete the development of TFX and its engine after you have taken out some 40 billion dollars from your procurement budget and spent it on not one but 3 different combat aircraft?

Even if you could somehow do all of this, how many TFX are you gonna be able to actually procure with whatever is left?

At this point, I'm starting to believe that buying anything other than F-16 kits creates an unacceptable financial risk for the TFX.

Maybe that is the intent here.

There is an off the books Erdogan budget
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,132
Reactions
15 1,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
:cry: The Türkiye website writes that Lockheed Martin can produce 4 units of F16 per month. But with many countries waiting in line, the first F16s could be delivered in 2029 at best. Ankara is in a hurry and does not want to wait, so it offers to immediately deliver its planes from the warehouse, or to manufacture and modernize them in Turkey.
After all this, I personally have the famous Shakespearean question:LOL:
New vipers aren't urgent. As soon as we get at least a couple of existing ones modernized and delivered further embargoes become increasingly unlikely.
 

Fairon

Contributor
Messages
477
Reactions
6 1,200
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Maaaaybe 40 new Viper order could be turned into F35's and only modernization kits will be acquired. That could be an option.(a risky one)
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,454
Reactions
104 15,683
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
New vipers aren't urgent. As soon as we get at least a couple of existing ones modernized and delivered further embargoes become increasingly unlikely.
This is the least fighters we had since the second world war. F-4s are also goners. HvKK shrinked half to its size since 1990.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,454
Reactions
104 15,683
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We do have a disproportionately large UAV fleet at least
Which do come very handy but you're not replacing 20k MTOW F-16's that go Mach 1.6 with 700kilo TB2s that go 150kts. Even for ground ops, when we want to deal some real damage, it's F-16s with HGK-83s in double rails, not Akıncıs. What's the current Akıncı number anyway, I don't remember a delivery announcement for at least a year. Last number is what, 6-7?
 

Mis_TR_Like

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
1,725
Reactions
41 6,667
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
I think we're missing an important factor... one of the reasons why the USA is suddenly open to selling F-35s is coming threat of Anka 3s and Kızılelmas, as well as other unmanned stealth platforms.

Sure, neither aircraft is as potent as a true 5th gen fighter, but they also have their unique advantages. If we mass produce a few hundred of these babies, any military would think twice before trying anything... Plus I'm sure Turkish Aerospace is already working on Anka 4.

Our interim solution until KAAN is already here.

Watch, as soon as we conduct air-to-air tests or better yet, shoot down an Armenian or Syrian fighter jet with a Kızılelma, the US will beg to sell us F35s.
 

what

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
2,331
Reactions
17 6,858
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I have a question:

Let's say the procurement budget of TurAF for the next 20 years is $X Billion dollars. Out of this:

$ 20 billion goes to F-16V
$ 7-10 billion for Eurofighters
$ 7-10 billion for F-35s

How much will be left to complete the development of TFX and its engine after you have taken out some 40 billion dollars from your procurement budget and spent it on not one but 3 different combat aircraft?

Even if you could somehow do all of this, how many TFX are you gonna be able to actually procure with whatever is left?

At this point, I'm starting to believe that buying anything other than F-16 kits creates an unacceptable financial risk for the TFX.

Maybe that is the intent here.

Both the F35 project and 100+ orders and TF-X aka KAAN were planned simultaneously initially.
Maybe the deliveries of KAAN would have been stretched over more years, maybe KAAN itself would have been a cheaper plane but there was and is enough budget for both. Otherwise we would have never made the plans accordingly.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
492
Reactions
3 23 958
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
That's right, we would just have to add at least 30-40 Kizilelma to our inventory by 2028. Together with the F16 Özgur version, we would then already have a bulwark in the airspace in advance.

Akinci/Aksungur and TB3/TB2S could simply monitor the airspace permanently with their patrols and exert physiological pressure.
The Greeks have nothing comparable at the moment that can patrol continuously for at least 24-48 hours, with an AESA radar and multiple BVRAAM they would be a serious threat. While the drones would be really easy targets due to lack of maneuverability + speed and stealth, multiple squadrons of 6-8 drones each in the air would make up for it.
I'd love to see the F-16 or F-35 with at least 7-8 BVRAAMs pointed at them.
The funny thing would be that we would force them to launch their expensive aircraft, you could play cat and mouse with them every day, and they would have to take on expensive maintenance and extra wear and tear unlike us.
They know we won't pull the trigger, but forcing them to go on patrol with their planes is a big win in itself and they know we're doing it on purpose to piss them off.
Apart from that, the AESA radar built into the drones could be calibrated to the F-35 and Eurofighter by gradually decoding the radar signature.
 

godel44

Committed member
Messages
165
Reactions
8 504
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
So, let me ask something to the experts here about Kizilelma's performance against 4th gen aircraft. Not that it's an alternative to modernization of the F-16s or Kaan of course but many seem to be quite pessimistic about the A-A capabilities of KE whereas it seems like a very well-thought solution to me. So maybe I am missing something.

KE is supposed to have an RCS that is a lot smaller than F-16V and Rafale. Its radar will be a GaN based AESA radar which may be a scaled-down version of the one in F-16 Ozgur but still quite capable. So it seems like, primarily due to having a stealth design, it will be able to spot a F-16V or Rafale before it gets spotted and it will have Gokdogan missiles that will have long enough range to take advantage of the gap. F-16V and Rafale also have capable EW self-defense systems but if they don't see the KE, they can't make use of them.

So what is the issue here exactly? Would the radar on KE be too weak to spot the enemy (in which case the obvious solution is to use a bigger engine and radar) or would the enemy aircraft have passive EW self-defense? Or do people believe Kizilelma cannot be built with these specs in the near future?

In the absence of any issues I assume KE would be a good solution to any 4th or 4.5th gen aircraft we might face. Not to mention that a pack of KEs going against smaller numbers of enemy planes make it even more nightmarish for the enemy.
 

Relic

Experienced member
Canada Correspondent
Messages
2,057
Reactions
15 3,011
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Canada
Maaaaybe 40 new Viper order could be turned into F35's and only modernization kits will be acquired. That could be an option.(a risky one)
Why not make the following deal with USA?... Send all S-400 systems and interceptor missiles procured from Russia to Ukraine, along with a healthy quantity of 155mm artillery shells... In exchange for F-16's becoming F-35's and the lost value of S-400s in Patriots with PAC 3?

Everyone gets what they want / need :)
 

B_A

Contributor
Messages
1,117
Reactions
4 1,257
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
So, let me ask something to the experts here about Kizilelma's performance against 4th gen aircraft. Not that it's an alternative to modernization of the F-16s or Kaan of course but many seem to be quite pessimistic about the A-A capabilities of KE whereas it seems like a very well-thought solution to me. So maybe I am missing something.

KE is supposed to have an RCS that is a lot smaller than F-16V and Rafale. Its radar will be a GaN based AESA radar which may be a scaled-down version of the one in F-16 Ozgur but still quite capable. So it seems like, primarily due to having a stealth design, it will be able to spot a F-16V or Rafale before it gets spotted and it will have Gokdogan missiles that will have long enough range to take advantage of the gap. F-16V and Rafale also have capable EW self-defense systems but if they don't see the KE, they can't make use of them.

So what is the issue here exactly? Would the radar on KE be too weak to spot the enemy (in which case the obvious solution is to use a bigger engine and radar) or would the enemy aircraft have passive EW self-defense? Or do people believe Kizilelma cannot be built with these specs in the near future?

In the absence of any issues I assume KE would be a good solution to any 4th or 4.5th gen aircraft we might face. Not to mention that a pack of KEs going against smaller numbers of enemy planes make it even more nightmarish for the enemy.
Didnt because Current KE engine is too weak and too slow?

Current KE can only flight 0.6 -0.9Mach
 

B_A

Contributor
Messages
1,117
Reactions
4 1,257
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why not make the following deal with USA?... Send all S-400 systems and interceptor missiles procured from Russia to Ukraine, along with a healthy quantity of 155mm artillery shells... In exchange for F-16's becoming F-35's and the lost value of S-400s in Patriots with PAC 3?

Everyone gets what they want / need :)
Russian is too important to Turkish Economy now
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,132
Reactions
15 1,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I said this before but I speculate that TF6000 could have very high electricity generation capacity for its class, following the trend with newer engines, which could allow it to power full sized MURAD. For instance F110 generates 60 kVA, a single F404 is 40, F414 is 70, F135 is 160. EJ200 should be 40 each, these are the numbers I was able to find on google. In fact they are planning to increase F35 total generation to 400. I believe it would be possible for TF6000 to match F110. The generators use a fraction of engines total power ofcourse, but it would have design considerations about fuel consumption and heat etc. If you were to convert all of the thrust into electricity it would theoretically be around 2 MW. So I think 60 kW is doable.

With this, KE wouldn't be anywhere near a 5th or 6th gen obviously, but combined with low RCS it could keep up with Rafale. It would still have limited physical performance and mtow limitations, but usually A2A missions don't have the plane carrying maximum payload so that could be less of an issue.
 

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
1,132
Reactions
15 1,800
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Given this assumption two TF6000s would provide as much electricity as KAAN and F22?, could make a mini unmanned 5th gen fighter, but would probably not be cheap. And then imagine what that number is going to be for TF35000, I expect two of them should at the very least exceed the (160+80) of F35, so like 100+ each.
 

Osman

Committed member
Messages
277
Reactions
6 530
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Why not make the following deal with USA?... Send all S-400 systems and interceptor missiles procured from Russia to Ukraine, along with a healthy quantity of 155mm artillery shells... In exchange for F-16's becoming F-35's and the lost value of S-400s in Patriots with PAC 3?

Everyone gets what they want / need :)
Why not make the following deal with USA?... Send all S-400 systems and interceptor missiles procured from Russia to Ukraine, along with a healthy quantity of 155mm artillery shells... In exchange for F-16's becoming F-35's and the lost value of S-400s in Patriots with PAC 3?

Everyone gets what they want / need :)
Bro, s 400 is more than a SAM. It is politics. Turkey and West do not trust each other. Indeed a huge problem disguised under s 400 caatsa etc
 

Fatman17

Well-known member
Messages
354
Reactions
10 822
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
93-0660.jpg

Keep Flying!
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,840
Solutions
1
Reactions
29 5,273
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Maaaaybe 40 new Viper order could be turned into F35's and only modernization kits will be acquired. That could be an option.(a risky one)
Even if we could actually get F35s, and I know this is going to be an unpopular opinion, we shouldn't give up on F-16s. Mainly because we are a country that needs a workhorse in its fleet. Smaller countries that depend on other members of NATO to put in the flight hours for dirty work might transition away from 4th gen (well, 4.5 with upgrades in sensors, network capability and EW suites etc) completely, but, countries that are going to be doing that work are not only keeping their 4th gen fleets but they are upgrading and even expanding them.

Just off the top of my head, US and Israel are buying F-15s and recently started to upgrade their F-16s, France is buying Rafales, Spain ordered new Eurofighters while UK and Germany are upgrading theirs and might order T4s, China is still producing J-10s and rolled out a new upgrade.

Due to the shitshow of a region we are in and the terrorist threat we always face, we are going to need workhorses as well. 5th gen planes are expensive to fly and maintain, and I doubt Kaan is going to be any different. While we might eventually get light attack configuration of Hürjet, the words "light attack" makes a big difference there. Hürjet will have, according to Tusaş, 1500 kgs of payload which is just about the same as an Akıncı or Aksungur, (confused that with Hürkuş C) 2300kgs, less than half of an F-16. Buying those new F-16s would give us something that we can use for cheaper than a 5th gen with the capability to carry really heavy ordinance. In fact, I wouldn't mind at all if we also go for 40 Eurofighter T4s.

And if we go for F-35s in anyway, slim chance I know, I hope we try to get naval versions first and foremost.
 
Last edited:

Fatman17

Well-known member
Messages
354
Reactions
10 822
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
It seems Turkey was stuck in a cul-de-sac and couldn't wriggle out but in the end it opens the door on the F-35 program perhaps and the NOC for engines for the T-129 deal between Turkey 🇹🇷 and Pakistan 🇵🇰.

The doors 🚪 are opening
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom