Michael Corleone
Committed member
Removed? Why thoughSurprisingly BAF removed all three video of former chief's farewell speeches from FB and youtube. That's why i can't verify some points mentioned here.
Removed? Why thoughSurprisingly BAF removed all three video of former chief's farewell speeches from FB and youtube. That's why i can't verify some points mentioned here.
Removed? Why though
Surprisingly BAF removed all three video of former chief's farewell speeches from FB and youtube. That's why i can't verify some points mentioned here.
Out of interest, which channel is the BAF youtube official channel?
Mysteriously Removed just like the Bangladesh Air Show 2022 Agenda page.Surprisingly BAF removed all three video of former chief's farewell speeches from FB and youtube. That's why i can't verify some points mentioned here.
Would we not need more trainers if we wanted to increase the number of fighter squadrons to 10 ? Maybe current fleet of IJT might not be enough ?
Also IF we get a mix of EFT and Gripen , why not just get a complete gripen only fleet ?
If you scrolled down on that page it stated that ''DAY 4: Contracts will be Signed''
I don’t remember any contracted signing text that page but maybe they added it in between then and now ?Mysteriously Removed just like the Bangladesh Air Show 2022 Agenda page.
If you scrolled down on that page it stated that ''DAY 4: Contracts will be Signed''
very strange though.
I am hopeful BAF will announce the winner of MRCA competition and order it.
cant find it anywhere , but i am 100% certain it was there, should have taken a screenshot.
View attachment 23574
i am certain of it , i saw it and its not there anymore.I don’t remember any contracted signing text that page but maybe they added it in between then and now ?
I saw it too.But why dId they remove that?i am certain of it , i saw it and its not there anymore.
Probably will take a decade to decide if they should sign on the 4th day of the airshow or not?I saw it too.But why dId they remove that?
I saw it too.But why dId they remove that?
It will be impossible to sign the deal in the 4th day of 2022 air show after a decade.Probably will take a decade to decide if they should sign on the 4th day of the airshow or not?
Could have been a formidable air force with the F-5E (cheap to operate) and F-4 phantom II. I guess jimmy carter wasn't very interested in selling weapons like Reagan. Zia was pro-western so its very natural that he requested American fighters.BAF has some serious love for American fighter jet. From 1976-1977 in two years BAF tried to get F-5E-21, F- 4, F-104G, G-91Y and Chinook including Hawk SAM , four C-130 and lots of other things.
The problem was the economy. US didn’t want to sell to a nation which was compared to SudanCould have been a formidable air force with the F-5E (cheap to operate) and F-4 phantom II. I guess jimmy carter wasn't very interested in selling weapons like Reagan. Zia was pro-western so its very natural that he requested American fighters.
Getting access to US equipment and training is very good but it has some downsides of course.
We even sent pilots to train in Turkey , which is suspect was for F-16 training.We even got rejected in 1996 for f16s
About f7s I can’t tell, depends on the flight hours logged. If each pilot is getting 200hr/yr which I suspect they get half of then they should last quite a while. Especially the bgiWe even sent pilots to train in Turkey , which is suspect was for F-16 training.
how long do you think the F-7MB airframes will be fit for service ? maybe 2025 ? They need to put a tender , this time with a fair competition instead of ''Russian only'' Allow participation of Saab and Lockheed. Not sure about J-10C as recent events prove that China cannot be trusted on Burma.
We will also need 2 AWACS (one for nothern command and one for southern command to monitor sea and burma). BAF will also need some heavy transport aircraft like C-17 (which could help in UN deployment). Can i also add that we may need some kind of Aerial EW capability too.
As the economy grows , we can expect such things.
Anyone has the feeling that Uncle Sam might arm-twist and we end up getting F-16s and not EFTs?
Gripen would have been ideal, but Swedes stand no chance in face of US influence over BD.
it is hard to imagine for me how we can actually maintain both EFT (for MRCA) and F-16 (as single engine alternative) in future - as many are assuming it to be the case.
I don’t see us having twin and single engine western jets, we are struggling with getting just one squadron a combo is a daydream
Buying EFT doesn’t get any any leverage.
IF we get F-16, we can use Turkish Armaments.
New Air Chief is not a Fighter Pilot.
#Helicopter.
Exactly, US has lots of leverage over Philippines , but they went for Gripen.US can have all the influence over the Swedes but doubt it will effect BD. Look, US has more influence over Brazil, Hungary, Czech Republic and Philippine than BD but these countries chose Gripen instead of American fighter. So i doubt US really care that much about what fighter we choose.
Even if it is more expensive to initially integrate , we will not have to get Congressional approval from house and senate. Plus i highly doubt US would give us access to weapons like AGM-88 HARM, Harpoon, Penguin, JDAM, JASSM and many more. We can get the Turkish equivalents like SOMs, SAM decoy missiles etc. IF we ever get F-16s that is.I think Bilal from Quwa once said that inntegrating Turkish weapon specially AAM in new F-16 would cost more. Did any Turkish AAM become operational?
Hopefully we can also get the SPEAR+Storm Shadow Combination.Best air superiority fighter in this region with full weapon package, less string attached, no need wait for congress or DoD's approval. Getting F-16 as the backbone of the fleet or only operating it for next 30+ years will absolutely suicidal and stupid idea. If US can't arm twist/influence us much now then they sure will be able to do it after that.
I don't see us signing GSMIOA and ACSA anytime soon for obvious reasons.FM's statement on IPS+Quad, army chief's statement about buying what's best for us