The burden of proof is on the accuser.
If you accuse someone of something, you can't expect them to prove their innocence; you must bring your evidence.
Babacan ofc didn't directly say the name of Baykar. But it is no brainer to understand he mentioned Baykar. Also, his party shared this piece of evidence
, but it proves what Baykar said. They did not get money from the state.
They were also accused of getting money from İstanbul Municipality. Eventually, Baykar filed a lawsuit which ended Baykar winning the case. They couldn't bring a single piece of evidence even though Mayor is a CHP member.
Did you really consider the right to export missiles made by Roketsan as generous to help from the state? Seriously what is the point of combat UAVs without missiles? Did Roketsan not get money from those sales?
Temel Kotil talked about it a few times and said that the success of TB-2 is also good for them since it is an advertisement for the Turkish arms industry. They are selling Hürkuş, for example, and TB-2 surely was a factor in that because those states are also TB-2 buyers.
The state also had to provide them with the land. Because you know what? They made a flying thing that carries an 80 kg high explosive payload. You can't do it in your grandfather's backyard. Also, there is sensitive technology; you must be under the state's eye.
Also, Babacan is right in principle. But if you look give pay attention to Oğuz Ergin, who is working with the Defense Industry and has a lot of students working there, you can understand that the biggest problem is not Baykar or TUSAŞ or BMC. It is actually ASELSAN.
Also, in many talks, Kozan Erkan confirmed this, especially if you watch his last video with Fazıl Hızal, who is running many critical projects by himself. Although he didn't directly mention ASELSAN, his words correlate with Oğuz Ergin. They also confirmed that Baykar is most honest defense company for subcontractors.