Vietnam???Picking fight with someone who is 10 times smaller than you is nothing to be prould of, it's a clear sign of weakness and cowardice. How about picking someone your own size?
Vietnam???Picking fight with someone who is 10 times smaller than you is nothing to be prould of, it's a clear sign of weakness and cowardice. How about picking someone your own size?
China never brags about the war in Vietnam, China gained Paracel islands in the sea battle in 1974 and some reefs in Spratly islands in 1987 from Vietnam, but that's nothing worth bragging about. Most Chiinese don't even know those battles.Vietnam???
well India is attacked first, so I don't think they brag about it, it's just a reminder.China never brags about the war in Vietnam, China gained Paracel islands in the sea battle in 1974 and some reefs in Spratly islands in 1987 from Vietnam, but that's nothing worth bragging about. Most Chiinese don't even know those battles.
But every Chinese knows Korean war, cause US was at least a worthy enemy. By the way, very few Chinese know there was a war against India in 1962.
It doesn't matter cause you were fighting a much smaller opponent. Korean war was fought into a stalemate after China joined, before that point US army had already destroyed N. Korean army and pushed close the the Chinese border.well India is attacked first, so I don't think they brag about it, it's just a reminder.
on the other hand, Korea is a stalemate.
oh, the UN was advancing into China's border with the believe that China will not intervene, turns out China did intervene, and causes the shock and rout of the UN troops, but they managed to stabilize the front and make most Chinese attempts into a killing field for Chinese troops.It doesn't matter cause you were fighting a much smaller opponent. Korean war was fought into a stalemate after China joined, before that point US army had already destroyed N. Korean army and pushed close the the Chinese border.
China started along her border and finished half way through Korea, so the goal of pushing US away from the border and re establish N.Korea was achieved. US removed their WWII hero Douglas MacArthur.oh, the UN was advancing into China's border with the believe that China will not intervene, turns out China did intervene, and causes the shock and rout of the UN troops, but they managed to stabilize the front and make most Chinese attempts into a killing field for Chinese troops.
also India won against the smaller enemy, while you actually lost against the smaller ones (namely Vietnam and Japan)
again , Mc Arthur was removed after he suggested nuking China, so for that you give credit to the US for being merciful. not China, who clearly sent an army masked as volunteers. the Fact that China fails to rout the UN is because the US.China started along her border and finished half way through Korea, so the goal of pushing US away from the border and re establish N.Korea was achieved. US removed their WWII hero Douglas MacArthur.
Japan was a smaller but more powerful country during WWII, Like UK used to be more powerful than US despite its smaller size, so Japan was not a weaker enemy.
As for China Vietnam border war, there was no winner or loser, it's just a border conflict, no lands lost by either side. Saying who won and who lost is far fetched.
10 times smaller? Is that what is written in the Little Red Book?Picking fight with someone who is 10 times smaller than you is nothing to be prould of, it's a clear sign of weakness and cowardice. How about picking someone your own size?
He promised to bring the soldiers back to home before Christmas and after suffering several humiliating defeats he just lost it and suggested nuclear solution. He lost his mind because of the defeats he suffered in Korea, he never wanted to nuke Korea before those defeats.again , Mc Arthur was removed after he suggested nuking China, so for that you give credit to the US for being merciful. not China, who clearly sent an army masked as volunteers. the Fact that China fails to rout the UN is because the US.
This is a Historical Thread showing AV from the 1971 War. Feel free to add anything related to the war. Please refrain from trolling, derailing and posting stuff not related to the 1971 War.He promised to bring the soldiers back to home before Christmas and after suffering several humiliating defeats he just lost it and suggested nuclear solution. He lost his mind because of the defeats he suffered in Korea, he never wanted to nuke Korea before those defeats.
PRC was just established for one year back then and China never intended to wipe out US army, China's goal is to keep US away from her door cause a one year old country was very unstable at home, can't afford to have outside force breathing down close on her neck.
Japan in its prime time managed to control less than one third of China, and only in the cities, not the countryside, Japanese army took the advanage of China's civil war when KMT and Communists were at each other's throats.look Japan already beat you before WW2, talking about the spectacular victories of the 1st Sino-Japanese war when they defeat you with lesser man and weapons.
Wrong, China doesn't care about Pol Pot, China just wanted to use the war to open the western market to China. Deng xiaoping had a much grander plan for that border conflict.China Vietnam war has a winner and a looser, at which you could divide them into tactical and strategic win, China wins tactical war by capturing some northern area in Viet Nam while loosing the strategic goals on which they put themselves in war in the first place,( namely saving Pol Pot regime in Cambodia ), that explains why you can't, instead of wont brag about it.
yes humiliating defeat in which unprepared troops fought a human tsunamis masked as volunteers because the country that sends them don't want the political repercussions that comes with fighting the US openly. it's still is a stalemate, in which there are more Chinese dead than the UN. you can't change that. the fact that the US doesn't use nuke is more of a mercy than defeat. your furthest advance is only half of Korea, while they're furthest is almost to the Chinese border fence.He promised to bring the soldiers back to home before Christmas and after suffering several humiliating defeats he just lost it and suggested nuclear solution. He lost his mind because of the defeats he suffered in Korea, he never wanted to nuke Korea before those defeats.
PRC was just established for one year back then and China never intended to wipe out US army, China's goal is to keep US away from her door cause a one year old country was very unstable at home, can't afford to have outside force breathing down close on her neck.
how are you winning?? Vietnam achieve two goals at the same time, the preservation of their state whilst denying China's aid to Pol Pot and occupying Cambodia itself.Wrong, China doesn't care about Pol Pot, China just wanted to use the war to open the western market to China. Deng xiaoping had a much grander plan for that border conflict.
Bragging about what? China won 1962 war but very few Chinese know that war, cause it's nothing worth bragging about.
It's a war between two camps, PRC was just one year old and very poor and US accounts for 52% of the world total GDP, of coused China suffered more casualties, it goes without saying.yes humiliating defeat in which unprepared troops fought a human tsunamis masked as volunteers because the country that sends them don't want the political repercussions that comes with fighting the US openly. it's still is a stalemate, in which there are more Chinese dead than the UN. you can't change that. the fact that the US doesn't use nuke is more of a mercy than defeat. your furthest advance is only half of Korea, while they're furthest is almost to the Chinese border fence.
You can remove my post about them sticking to 1971.Please continue debate here about Chinese war history (that went OT in original thread) @#comcom @Jackdaws @whatintarnation @xizhimen et al.
The OP thread title can may be changed to "Chinese war history" etc if you could do the honours @Webslave