We have been doing the same thing giving palm oil and hard cash for big ticket items.In Malaysia's trainer and LCA tender, it was claimed that had Hürjet won it some of the program costs would be paid by barter through giving palm oil to Turkey worth few hundred millions. Unsure if Koreans that won it were given the same deal. Main issue here is our inability of offering financing deals we can offer for our exports actually, not Malaysians exploring the option to pay with bartering other commodities which in itself is fine.
Where did you get that from? Because that is not what is on TAI's website.Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
Roles:Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
You sound a bit insulted, but I have not been able to see any post from MOU with spain that would warrant such reaction.We have been doing the same thing giving palm oil and hard cash for big ticket items.
So whats the problem...Still many countries offer it to sell to Malaysia.
You can just sell it to your country.
We sell a lot of palm oil to Turkey.
If you don't then sell to international market.
So whats the problem...
You are talking about selling a jet which is still on drawing board to our country.
Do you think the Malaysian people will accept it...
There will be a lot of noice if we buy it while The Korean jets have been flying for years and sell to many countries already.
Furthermore,Seems so far we got no problems buying arms with our palm oil from many european,american,russia and others.
Even the FA 50 deal is bought with half paid by palm oil.
Maybe next time when Turkey decided to sell their products to Malaysia they should ask the smart guy in this forun to specified it all in hard cash.
Fortunately the Ada class bought for lms batch 2 is not bought with palm oil..paid all by hard cash
Roles:
...................
...................
Red aircraft?
And for us it is natural for to go for WIN-WIN agreement.You sound a bit insulted, but I have not been able to see any post from MOU with spain that would warrant such reaction.
IMO it's only natural to conduct trades with hard currency especially because you don't have to go out and try to sell bartered product to get your money.
Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
tusaş original web site pdf formatWhere did you get that from? Because that is not what is on TAI's website.
hürjet range 61nmil more than FA-50,max speed is 0.1 mach less,but rate of climb difference is more important than this,very near to F 16,overall hürjet has more wing area,more agile,better suited for red aircraft role than the FA-50.It has the same engine with FA-50 and the same thrust but it has less range, less payload capacity and less speed. Why?
I confused miles and nautical miles.hürjet range 61nmil more than FA-50
yes but the Korean one can carry 2 tons more payload for the same thrust. that is not a mere detail.max speed is 0.1 mach less,but rate of climb difference is more important than this,very near to F 16,overall hürjet has more wing area,more agile,better suited for red aircraft role than the FA-50.
We have to wait for clearing of emty weight and Maximum take offf weight of hürjetI confused miles and nautical miles.
yes but the Korean one can carry 2 tons more payload for the same thrust. that is not a mere detail.