We have been doing the same thing giving palm oil and hard cash for big ticket items.In Malaysia's trainer and LCA tender, it was claimed that had Hürjet won it some of the program costs would be paid by barter through giving palm oil to Turkey worth few hundred millions. Unsure if Koreans that won it were given the same deal. Main issue here is our inability of offering financing deals we can offer for our exports actually, not Malaysians exploring the option to pay with bartering other commodities which in itself is fine.
Where did you get that from? Because that is not what is on TAI's website.Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
Roles:Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
You sound a bit insulted, but I have not been able to see any post from MOU with spain that would warrant such reaction.We have been doing the same thing giving palm oil and hard cash for big ticket items.
So whats the problem...Still many countries offer it to sell to Malaysia.
You can just sell it to your country.
We sell a lot of palm oil to Turkey.
If you don't then sell to international market.
So whats the problem...
You are talking about selling a jet which is still on drawing board to our country.
Do you think the Malaysian people will accept it...
There will be a lot of noice if we buy it while The Korean jets have been flying for years and sell to many countries already.
Furthermore,Seems so far we got no problems buying arms with our palm oil from many european,american,russia and others.
Even the FA 50 deal is bought with half paid by palm oil.
Maybe next time when Turkey decided to sell their products to Malaysia they should ask the smart guy in this forun to specified it all in hard cash.
Fortunately the Ada class bought for lms batch 2 is not bought with palm oil..paid all by hard cash
Roles:
...................
...................
Red aircraft?
And for us it is natural for to go for WIN-WIN agreement.You sound a bit insulted, but I have not been able to see any post from MOU with spain that would warrant such reaction.
IMO it's only natural to conduct trades with hard currency especially because you don't have to go out and try to sell bartered product to get your money.
Hürjet specs were changed much more improved than before,especially rate of climb,sustained turn rate,and carry load
tusaş original web site pdf formatWhere did you get that from? Because that is not what is on TAI's website.
hürjet range 61nmil more than FA-50,max speed is 0.1 mach less,but rate of climb difference is more important than this,very near to F 16,overall hürjet has more wing area,more agile,better suited for red aircraft role than the FA-50.It has the same engine with FA-50 and the same thrust but it has less range, less payload capacity and less speed. Why?
I confused miles and nautical miles.hürjet range 61nmil more than FA-50
yes but the Korean one can carry 2 tons more payload for the same thrust. that is not a mere detail.max speed is 0.1 mach less,but rate of climb difference is more important than this,very near to F 16,overall hürjet has more wing area,more agile,better suited for red aircraft role than the FA-50.
We have to wait for clearing of emty weight and Maximum take offf weight of hürjetI confused miles and nautical miles.
yes but the Korean one can carry 2 tons more payload for the same thrust. that is not a mere detail.
Aren't those conjunctures. Are you saying that with EU countries as potential buyers Hürjet will have an EJ200 variant ?The future variant of Hurjet, referred to as the light combat aircraft, will be subject to significant improvements in this sense, the most important of which, in my opinion, will be the payload capacity. The aircraft will continue to develop both structurally and on the avionics side for a long time. In the long marathon, I can say that the Hürjet will have at least two engine options for potential markets and will become a solution that can meet both light attack and supersonic capable advanced training needs as a common system.
As a LIFT aircraft, the Hürjet will have to enable training with real ammunition and in conditions that simulate a real combat environment. In fact, the Hürjet is a natural end-stage tactical trainer for many NATO main combat fighter jets; only with minor variant changes according to the main combat fleet structures of the user countries. For a generation, two-seat F-5s were the perfect jets for this role. The Hürjet has the potential to take over next decades.
Are most of them buying the F-35s? Everyone wants stealth nowadays which is why its safe to assume the sales for hurjet would be geared more towards south america, asia, middleeast and africa.Europeans would prefer Russian occupation to the shame -OH SHAME!- of buying a Turkish fighter jet. Germans and the French especially. They would cut a finger or two to spite us.
Hürjet is a trainer/light fighter jet. Admittedly it's one of the most suitable ones in its class for many european nations. Only real competitor is South Korean AFAIK. Others are either from rival blocs, only 3D renders or dreadful EU projects (bloated, over expensive, not roduce in numbers etc.).Are most of them buying the F-35s? Everyone wants stealth nowadays which is why its safe to assume the sales for hurjet would be geared more towards south america, asia, middleeast and africa.