• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Defence Exports & Updates

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,193
Reactions
127 19,054
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Possible continuation of business links with Chile. Claimed Aselsan offer of modernizing up to 270 Chilean Marder 1A3s with Aselsan gear. No details on the scope of the program. But Chilean links are nothing new, Aselsan was tasked with modernizing radios of these vehicles few years ago as well.

"Following the Leopard 2A4 MBT modernisation package to be delivered by ASELSAN, another package is on the horizon. Chile-based defence news platform La Trinchera reported that Chilean officials have begun discussing a modernisation package for German-made Marder 1A3 IFVs with their Turkish counterparts.

And our first ever look into phase 2 of Aselsan's Chilean Leo2A4 mod program, ATS-65D commander's EO sight

"It was predicted that ASELSAN would use the ATS-65 commander’s sights for the second phase of Leopard 2A4 modernisation for the Chilean Army. Previously, internal systems like radios were modernised to improve communication capabilities.

The second phase involves new optical systems, a fire control system (Likely VOLKAN type), and a 360-degree situational awareness system."



1754222044523.png


 

Kaan Azman 

Contributor
DH Visual Specialist
Messages
610
Reactions
30 2,434
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Türkiye's CANiK signs defense deals with Pakistan, Bangladesh, Azerbaijan at IDEF 2025

In a separate agreement, SYS will supply the Bangladesh Navy with new defense systems, including the CANiK M2 QCB 12.7x99 mm heavy machine gun and the VENOM LR, a low-recoil 30x113 mm medium-caliber cannon developed by UNIROBOTICS for counter-drone operations (C-UAS).


I wonder if Aselsan SMASH would have been a better choice. Didn't know anything about VENOM LR.
We have not seen SMASH fire ATOM 25 either
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,587
Reactions
60 10,080
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
The government may opt to buy low-priced drones made in Turkey, which have been used by Ukraine in its fight against Russia's invasion, so that the aerial devices can be deployed to the Japanese Self-Defense Forces as early as possible, according to the sources.

I believe that TB-3 would be the right choice for Japan in case it opts to purchase them from Türkiye, not TB-2.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,587
Reactions
60 10,080
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes, but according to that article they want

and

.
I believe that the TB-3 would be lower priced than its competitors if there were any and we all know how Baykar produces the drones in record times especially if they have an export customer. That being said, Japan could opt for a combination of the two to cover all bases.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,654
Reactions
15 8,712
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Japan seems to have 4 LHD ships that can possibly operate TB3. They should deploy 6 planes on each to a total of 24+ spares. They are adapting those ships to F35 though.
 

Turkic

Well-known member
Messages
320
Reactions
5 629
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Japan seems to have 4 LHD ships that can possibly operate TB3. They should deploy 6 planes on each to a total of 24+ spares. They are adapting those ships to F35 though.

Can TB3 operate on a 248m long ship with no ramp?
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,654
Reactions
15 8,712
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Can TB3 operate on a 248m long ship with no ramp?
Probably, a more powerful engine can be fitted if necessary.

EDIT: Ships' height seem suitable even without a ramp and TB3 does not even lose altitude at take off.
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Moderator
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,857
Reactions
67 22,002
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
TB2 has been battle tested and used by many countries. Keeping it simple would be the right choice even if it's temporarily
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
701
Reactions
3 30 1,432
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
You should try to appease Japan so that Turkey can gain access to Tempest alongside TAI KAAN.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
As far as I know, Japan is the only country opposed to cooperation in the Tempest program. Great Britain and Italy were very positive about Turkey's interest.
If you have to appease a party to have a chance on joining such a project then better not join such a cooperation/program.
if they(Japan) think you dont bring anything to the party they will try to dictate what how where when you can use the platform.
We dont need that.
If Japan wants to buy drones thats fine but no appeasing or whatever.
Tempest will be like the Boramae,full of American subsystems and or components.
No different from the F-16,F-35 etc.
We should develop further from the KAAN.
 

IC3M@N FX

Contributor
Messages
701
Reactions
3 30 1,432
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
You are absolutely right – but Turkey urgently needs access to American/European high-end platforms.
The best example of this is the TAI KAAN: without participation in the F-16 and F-35 programs, this project would have been virtually impossible in its current form.

This is not about imposing new dependencies on ourselves with an aircraft overburdened with ITAR restrictions, but rather about diversifying our own fleet. To do this, it is entirely sufficient to procure 60–70 aircraft in order to participate credibly and effectively in NATO operations – purchasing over 100+ aircraft is therefore not necessary.

Another aspect is the nuclear dimension: Currently, the F-16 is Turkey's only platform capable of carrying US nuclear warheads in Incirlik.
Even if their use would only be possible with Washington's approval, this factor remains a strategic element that should not be underestimated in view of the future security situation with Russia and China – no one knows what will happen in 10–15 years.
It is unlikely that we will ever use it, but having access to it is deterrent enough.
Neither the US/EU nor Russia/China are friends or true partners, but access to it is key to showing Russia and China that we can become pro-NATO again if necessary and if you exert pressure.

Furthermore – and I'm sure you'll agree with me here – Turkey needs comparable high-end systems.
Only through detailed analysis, cooperation, and direct comparison can the KAAN and its successors be consistently developed and improved technologically.
A role as co-developer or OEM partner in the GCAP program would be a valuable step in this context.
The passive transfer of technology alone would be enormously valuable.
 
Last edited:
T

TR_123456

Guest
You are absolutely right – but Turkey urgently needs access to American/European high-end platforms.
The best example of this is the TAI KAAN: without participation in the F-16 and F-35 programs, this project would have been virtually impossible in its current form.

This is not about imposing new dependencies on ourselves with an aircraft overburdened with ITAR restrictions, but rather about diversifying our own fleet. To do this, it is entirely sufficient to procure 60–70 aircraft in order to participate credibly and effectively in NATO operations – purchasing over 100+ aircraft is therefore not necessary.

Another aspect is the nuclear dimension: Currently, the F-16 is Turkey's only platform capable of carrying US nuclear warheads in Incirlik.
Even if their use would only be possible with Washington's approval, this factor remains a strategic element that should not be underestimated in view of the future security situation with Russia and China – no one knows what will happen in 10–15 years.

Furthermore – and I'm sure you'll agree with me here – Turkey needs comparable high-end systems.
Only through detailed analysis, cooperation, and direct comparison can the KAAN and its successors be consistently developed and improved technologically.
A role as co-developer or OEM partner in the GCAP program would be a valuable step in this context.
The passive transfer of technology alone would be enormously valuable.
So,name me a project where Japan was involved and was succesful in completion?
Remember France and international projects.
You want to have 60/70 Tempests in 2040/45?
Does it sound reasonable or logical when you have a 5th gen fully operational by then?
You think we stop at the KAAN in lets say 2035?
The world is changing,by then most ''Western'' countries and allies will lack behind in development and other big players will be happy to have us as partners.
You are overthinking it,when we have the KAAN ready and i mean ready to use with our indigenous engine there is no more need to ask to join any project.
We will be automaticly invited to join and this time without any dumb clauses where they can kick us out.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,968
Reactions
61 5,303
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Once upon time I was insulted for being idiot. Where are those now?


Turkish Export of Cobra2 to Romania
more than 1000 vehicles. Some of them with 25mm auto cannon!!

I am wondering when Turkish Carl Gustav recoilless rifle will appear .
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
7,116
Reactions
10 6,130
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Just curious, technically is it possible to equip NEB-84 bunker buster with AASM Hammer kit and launch it from Rafale?

1000448180.png

1000448181.jpg
 

Tornadoss

Experienced member
Messages
1,556
Reactions
7 3,092
Nation of residence
Czechia
Nation of origin
Turkey
In theory, why not? NEB is based on MK-84 so it could be used. although winged guidance kit would be more cost efficient I think.

kgk_dekupe.png
There was a post here, apparently winged kit not suitable for bunker buster as they need to hit fast and gliding decrease the speed.
 
Top Bottom