EW Developments in Turkish Air Force

Hexciter

Experienced member
Messages
2,575
Reactions
4 11,451
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
İbrahim Sünnetci
Status Report: EHPOD & EDPOD Projects
3DC204B2-93FE-4EFC-8C7F-4B5DD8874952.jpeg

The Project on the Development of the Electronic Warfare Pod (EHPOD) System for F-16 Aircraft is being executed with indigenous facilities under the coordination of TÜBİTAK. The Critical Design Stage of the Project has been completed and the integration activities are in progress. Capable of using both ‘coherent’ and ‘non-coherent’ techniques due to its DRFM technology is optimized as the self-protection pod of the F-16 Aircraft, the EHPOD System is able to provide users with “considerably more” effective radiated power (ERP) from both the AN/ALQ-211(V)9 and EL/L-8225 external EW Self-Defense Pods in the inventory of Turkish Air Forces Command (TurAF/HvKK) and internal EW Self-Defense Systems.

The Project on the Development of the Electronic Warfare Pod (EHPOD) System for the F-16 Aircraft was launched by the Ministry of National Defense (MoND) within the scope of the demands of the TurAF. The Project is being executed through indigenous facilities under the coordination of TUBITAK in line with the signed contract. The Project was planned to be realized through10 stages each of which lasts 6 months and activities were launched as of December 1, 2014. According to news published in the press in December 2014, the EHPOD’s cost per aircraft was projected as nearly US$ 2 million and the cost of the development and prototype production was estimated at the level of TRY 135 million.

Within the scope of the Project, three EHPODs will be manufactured as serial production prototypes. During attack, defense and joint operations of F-16 Aircraft, the EHPOD will enable self-protection against air defense elements. It is designed as an external pod and it will be integrated to the aircraft and operate in coordination with the KTAS/CMDS with receiver (RWR) and jammer (ECM) features. It is being developed as a system capable of functioning unaided in all flight profiles of the F-16 Platform.

The RWR gives warning as it detects threat radars in the environment, generates data on the direction and the identity of the radar while the ECM system launches Electronic Warfare (EW) to the threat detected by the RWR. The EHPOD will conduct its tasks by utilizing the data on the identified threat, EW technique and system parameters in its task data file. The interface between the EHPOD and the pilot will be achieved with the Pilot Imaging and Control Unit developed as part of the Project.

The EHPOD Project is being funded by the TÜBİTAK Support Program for the Research and Development Projects of the Public Institutions. TUBITAK BILGEM ILTAREN is the Project Manager; TUBITAK BILGEM BTE, TUBITAK UZAY and Havelsan EHSIM are the Project Coordinators. Environmental conditions verification and external load certification tests of the EHPOD are being carried out by TUBITAK SAGE. Joint activities are being conducted with the 1st Air Supply and Maintenance Factory Directorate (former 1st Air Supply and Maintenance Center Command) under the TurAF for the identification of the interface with the F-16 aircraft and the integration.

In TUBITAK’s recently published 2019 Annual Report, the following information was shared on the latest status of the Project: “The Unit Tests and Critical Design Stage of the Electronic Warfare and Electronic Support Pods have been completed. These are the very first indigenous and national Electronic Warfare Pods. They are being developed for the F-16 Aircraft platform and integration activities are also being carried out as part of the Project.”

We had the opportunity to get in contact with a TUBITAK official at a fair held in 2018 and we were informed that the Critical Design Phase and the initial tests in the laboratory environment had been completed. We were also told that the activities regarding the integration phase had been launched in the second half of 2018. On that very date, the integration activities over the F-16C were planned to be conducted in 2018 and the test flights with the F-16C were intended to be launched in 2019. In light of the information provided in the Annual Report, it may be considered that the first EHPOD flight test to be executed over the F-16, that was previously expected to take place in 2019, could only be conducted after the completion of the integration activities in 2020 or in the beginning of 2021.

The indigenous EHPOD System is being developed as a self-protection (Self-Defense) pod. Self-protection pods are capable of fulfilling operational requirements different than Escort Jamming or Stand-Off Jamming (SOJ) systems, therefore their system requirements are different. Utilization of a pod optimized specifically for one, in the other, is generally not preferred. The indigenous EHPOD is a system optimized as the self-protection pod for the F-16 Aircraft. The F-16 Aircraft is an aircraft with a wide range of flight profiles and maneuver capability, therefore the design and development of a pod that can be operational in all flight profiles requires the optimization of numerous system functions in an interrelated manner. Another parameter that affects the success in the development of such pods is analyzing all threat spectrums well and carrying out the design and production of the system functions in a way to be effective against all potential threats. All such issues require a very strict development life-cycle where the EW system criteria are identified by the relevant Force in line with specific operational requirements, hardware and software designs that are optimized in accordance with such requirements. Threats are analyzed in a comprehensive and detailed manner and where verification and validation are realized through the execution of large-scale field tests. Moreover, the development of indigenous algorithms is absolutely essential for the performance and security of the system and this entails a deep scientific background and field experience.

The Indigenous EHPOD is a new generation electronic jamming system that is capable of smart jamming through its internal DRFM (Digital RF Memory). This system is designed in a way to feature listening, sense of direction, jamming, deception and noise capabilities. With its broad band, narrow and wide band RWR sub-system, high precision sense of direction, high effective radiated power (ERP), DRFM based broad beam jamming and deception capability optimized for the criteria it is designed upon, multiple simultaneous engagement capability, high-performance heating/cooling system (Environmental Conditioning System [ECS]) enabling the system to operate in all flight profiles, advanced jamming techniques effective against all threat spectrums in line with the operational requirements and reprogramming feature through the Task Data File developed with indigenous design, it is a system ranked among the top category of the EW Pods that exist in the inventories of developed countries.

According to the information shared in the 2016 Havelsan EHSIM Annual Report published in February 2017, the EW Suite Manager concept was developed for EHPOD’s integration into the F-16C Aircraft and upon its preliminary design, the system was revealed as a result of the activities performed with the 1st Air Supply Factory Directorate. According to the report, as of December 2016 the hardware and software development activities were being carried out. The report also stated that the Radar EW Simulator (RASSIM) developed as part of the Project would enable the application of threats, that the EHPOD might encounter in the battlefield, into the antenna inputs at laboratory. The threat signals with phase simulation to be generated in 4 different channels by RASSIM in line with the generated scenarios will be applied to the EHPOD to test operational performance of the system.

Within the scope of the Project which was planned to be completed in 2019 (though this schedule could not be achieved) TUBITAK UZAY is responsible for the structural design of the pod, cooling system design, aerodynamic design, power distribution unit design and design of the case. Additionally, the structural design of the EHPOD to be utilized in the F-16C combat aircraft that will fly at supersonic speeds, was made in line with military standards by TUBITAK UZAY. The outer shell geometry of the 4-meter long EHPOD was designed as similar as possible to the external centerline fuel tank of 300 gallons (1.150 liters) of the F-16 Aircraft. Aluminum alloys and composite materials (for a light weight and resilient product) are utilized in the production of the pods. The turbo compressor, exchanger, pump, accumulator, pipe system and unions/fittings are part of the 100% indigenously designed cooling system which guarantees the system’s performance under all F-16 flight conditions.

Liquid cooling technology is used in the active heat control system of the EHPOD. The EHPOD with liquid and air cooling and natural heating during the flight receives the air as RAM Air through the air inlet near the front of the hull and spreads it within the pod through the turbo compressor. A RAM Air Turbine (RAT) was not required in the EHPODs as the F-16C Aircraft is able to supply the power required for the system. As a result of the adequate energy efficiency and the existing power supply in the aircraft, there is no need for a RAT type cooling technology.

According to the information we obtained, instead of using Active Electronically Scanned Phased Arrayed (AESA) antenna technology, a broad beamed multiple ‘horn’ antenna group was utilized in the EHPOD System which is to be integrated and certified for the F-16C type aircraft. The main objective behind the design of this structure is ultimately achieving efficiency in jamming. This form of antenna acquires broad beam capability that could best tolerate direction faults likely to occur in all the maneuvers of the F-16C Aircraft. In conclusion, since the EW Pod is a self-protection EW Pod instead of an Escort Jamming pod, and as the primary purpose consists of the self-defense of the carrier F-16 Aircraft, the multiple ‘horn’ antenna group design is preferred as the most optimum and cost-effective solution.

In order to fulfill the high ERP requirement, RAT is used in the AN/ALQ-99 series Tactical Jamming System (TJS) and the EL/L-8251 Escort Jamming Pod. Aerodynamic problems occur at supersonic speeds when the RAT is used in the front part of the pod (as seen in the EA-18G Growler and the AN/ALQ-99 TJS), in addition, no antennas can be placed at the fore part of the pod. Instead of a RAT, a High Impact RAM Air Turbine (HIRAT) is being used in the New Generation Jamming (NGJ) Pod that is being developed for the EA-18G Growler Aircraft. According to open sources, while the RAT within the AN/ALQ-99 Pod has a power capacity of 27kW, the HIRAT generator in the NGJ Pod with AESA antenna technology and Gallium Nitrate (GaN) based semiconductor chips (in this way it could be placed in the centerline instead of the nose part) is capable of generating power over 140kW. It is also stated that it will have 360-degree coverage capability as it will feature an antenna in the fore part in contrast to the ALQ-99. There are two CW transmitters in every ALQ-99 Pod and the ERP value of each of these transmitters could reach over 100kW depending on the frequency band. The ERP value for the NGJ Pod is targeted as 1MW. The EA-18G Growler will be able to perform while at supersonic speeds with the help of the NGJ Pod, however, according to open sources, the jamming task can be performed usually at Mach 0.95 that is the speed where the system reaches its highest efficiency.

According to the information we obtained, the EHPOD System is capable of providing its users ‘considerably more’ effective radiated power than both the external EW Self-Defense Pods such as the AN/ALQ-211(V)9 and the EL/l-8225 in the inventory of the TurAF and internal EW Self-Defense Systems.

The EHPOD with a high-capacity DRFM capability is able to apply modern coherent and non-coherent jamming techniques to more than one threat radar. On account of such capacities, the EHPOD is also capable of eliminating the effectiveness of threat radars both in search and track modes.

Modern EW Pods utilize both ‘coherent’ and ‘non-coherent’ techniques against threat radars. The technique of phase coherent jamming is claimed to be the top-level jamming technique in technological terms. Here, the pulse of the threat radar is acquired through utilizing a DRFM and it is recorded and the ET/deception technique is applied and transmitted back to the radar. In this way the radar is convinced that its own pulse returned if it is technologically smart radar. However, if you apply ET over a smart radar without a DRFM, then you say to the radar that you’re not jammming it with the artificial pulse transmitted, and in this case when this radar receives the transmitted pulse, it is able to detect that it doesn’t belong to it and thus leaves it aside (the ‘jamming stop’ capability). Therefore, it is not affected by electronic jamming. This capability is called ECCM.

The EW Pod is a strategic product with critical value. Therefore, it has to be developed through indigenous facilities. Because of a few lines of code discreetly installed in the pod by a foreign manufacturer, an imported EHPOD may not be utilized effectively if Turkey goes to a war in the future with the same country that the pod is imported from or with a country that is an ally of this country. Since EW Pod or radars have a sensor (receiver) and as these receivers are designed in a way to receive a certain series of pulses (certain frequency bands), they could easily switch to failure mode due to special software/code previously embedded in the EW Pod or the radar by the manufacturer company. For instance, the system could be triggered to signal a ‘temperature warning’ through transmitting a series of pulses. Even if the temperature is 25 degrees, because of the pulse transmitted, it can be perceived as 90 degrees and the system may shut itself down due to the Built-In Test function. Therefore, the indigenous EW Pod and air defense radar systems as well as the software and algorithms used in these systems are essential. For instance, due to the EW techniques used during war, Ukraine is not capable of utilizing many of its systems based on Russian technology against the Russian Army or on the separatist powers supported by Russia.

Internal and Pod type EW Self-Defense Systems are designed in a way to receive a radar pattern; you can instruct what to do when the pattern is received. The system receives the wave of the threat radar, selects the deception/jamming technique and launches the jamming/deception process. By analyzing the pulse transmitted through the radar, the system detects that it is a SA-8 System then identifies it and the EW is launched with the technique compliant with the SA-8 in the Task Data File over it. If no technique is available in the Task Data File, then the System applies the noise technique.

On the other hand, TUBITAK BILGEM has been developing a Tactical Electronic Support Pod (EDPOD) also for the F-16 Aircraft in addition to the EHPOD. The EDPOD features an outer Shell similar to the external fuel tank of 300 gallons at the centerline of F-16 Aircrafts as well. Unveiled at TUBITAK’s booth at IDEF ‘19, the EDPOD System will contribute to the Electronic Order of Battle (EOB) by detecting and identifying threat radars and utilizing their geographical position data. Actually, Electronic Warfare starts way before facing the enemy’s aircraft and/or their missiles. Initially, the information and data on the surface, underwater, air and land platforms and the spectral bands/ frequencies of the radars and sensors over them and on the weapon systems they carry (potential threats) should be collected via the EDT/ELINT Systems and this data should be installed to the EW Data Bank during peace time and a reliable and high-resolution ‘Electronic Order of Battle’ that will contain all potential threats [surface, underwater, air and land-based] in the area of operation should be prepared. Because the reaction is launched upon the formation of the EOB and on account of the EOB previously prepared, the friendly components’ control over the zone will be facilitated. The tactical EDPOD System is capable of detecting threat radars via the Wide-Band and Narrow-Band Receivers over it. After identification, the arrival direction, frequency, pulse width, pulse amplitude, pulse repetition frequency, antenna scanning and inter-pulse modulation parameters are generated. Through the utilization of the arrival direction of the radars, their geographical positions are calculated. The EHPOD System records the contact parameters, location info, Pulse Descriptor Word (PDW) values and raw Intermediate Frequency data of the threat radars for post-operation analysis. It transmits the threat data it acquires to the other EHPODs in the operation field and to the Ground Support System via the Link-16 datalink network. The EDPOD System enables the analysis of the recordings it makes through the software on the Ground Support System. As a result of these analyses, the EHPOD and EDPOD Systems will contribute to the update of the National Joint EW Data Bank.
Source: https://www.defenceturkey.com/en/content/status-report-ehpod-edpod-projects-4059#carousel
 
T

Turko

Guest
Is there any example event about" EW jammed SAMs?" I really wonder how capable the EW pod. For instance EF18 could jam s300's missiles?
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,313
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Another development worth mentioning is the Karagoz System.
This is a Zeplin type balloon that is placed about 500m high and tethered to the ground with cable connection to the balloon’s electronic systems. it’s main job is to look out for aerial threats and pass it to ground units.
In a battle ground like Libya where the geography is flat, it is necessary to implement equipment such as Karagoz.
For ground based radar systems and air defence systems Karagoz would be priceless.
1609328029559.jpeg
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,231
Reactions
108 19,477
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Another development worth mentioning is the Karagoz System.
This is a Zeplin type balloon that is placed about 500m high and tethered to the ground with cable connection to the balloon’s electronic systems. it’s main job is to look out for aerial threats and pass it to ground units.
In a battle ground like Libya where the geography is flat, it is necessary to implement equipment such as Karagoz.
For ground based radar systems and air defence systems Karagoz would be priceless.
View attachment 10122
I am interested in its EO system and its specifications but couldn't find anything.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,252
Reactions
142 16,313
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I am interested in its EO system and its specifications but couldn't find anything.
Have you tried Googling reference books related to Electro Optical Systems , Also later adding “military” and “handbook of“ to the search parameters?
There are quite a lot of publications you can purchase. But there are papers and sites that give you a lot of information too.
here are a few:
check this site
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,231
Reactions
108 19,477
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
Have you tried Googling reference books related to Electro Optical Systems , Also later adding “military” and “handbook of“ to the search parameters?
There are quite a lot of publications you can purchase. But there are papers and sites that give you a lot of information too.
here are a few:
check this site
I mean of the exact system. We know that other company was marketing a wide area surveillance gimbal but nothing about Aselsan's solution in Karagoz.
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,231
Reactions
108 19,477
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
A

adenl

Guest
At the moment only YAVUZ and BARBAROS Class Frigates of the Turkish Navy have Radar EA capability thanks to their Scorpion 2 Radar EA System. Turkish Navy performed its first ever Radar EA test with Scorpion 2 Radar EA System on board the TCG Turgutreis Frigate against 16 F-16 aircraft of the TurAF in the Mediterranean Sea in 1993 and successfully jammed AN/APG-68 radars of these aircraft (which does not have AN/ALQ-178(V)3 EW Self Protection System at that time). According to a Thales product brochure, performing at 7.5GHz to 18GHz frequency range and providing 360-degree azimuth coverage, the DRFM capable Scorpion 2 is able to generate up to 200kW ERP and able to deal with 6 threats simultaneously.

Astounding capability from the Scorpion 2 EW against the then brand new AN/APG-68 radar. I wonder if this experience has led to improving the ECCM capability of newer variants of the AN/APG-68?
afbeelding_2021-02-11_144125.png

Peace Onyx I aircraft were originally fitted with the ALQ-178(V)3 Rapport III ECM systems. 160 passive and 122 active kits were installed. The Peace Onyx III F-16s were the first Turkish F-16s to be fitted with the Loral ALQ-178(V)5 Rapport III ECM system. The system was later installed on the Peace Onyx I & II aircraft as well.

Don't know which one of the two statements is true, but is an internal ECM system even capable of conducting ECCM or 'protecting' against EW systems?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Fatman17

Well-known member
Messages
316
Reactions
9 690
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan

TURKEY’S EYE IN THE SKY​

  1. Aviation Features
  2. Turkey’s eye in the sky


18th January 2018
FEATURE
Onur Kurç and Tayfun Ya s˛ar look at the Turkish Air Force’s Boeing 737 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, which has overcome early problems to patrol NATO airspace at home and abroad.
E-7T Peace Eagle
img_80-1_50.jpg

The THK Peace Eagle fleet is now available to support the alliance’s operations and protected the NATO Summit in Warsaw in 2016. Here, E-7T serial 13-003, named ‘Güney’ (south), extends its landing gear in flight over the Czech Republic during the NATO Days event at Ostrava in September 2017.
Evert Keijzer
Turkey initiated its AEW&C aircraft project for its air force – the Turk Hava Kuvvetleri (THK) – in order to help cement its status as a regional power. Such a platform would allow early identification of possible border violations – by fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters and missiles – and prevent potential incursions or attacks if ground radars were rendered ineffective. As well as serving with the THK, the aircraft was expected to play an active role in operations led by the army and navy.
The Boeing 737 AEW&C was selected in early December 2000 and contract negotiations continued throughout 2001. Boeing and Turkey’s Savunma Sanayii Muste s˛arlı g˘ ı (SSM, Undersecretariat for Defence Industries) eventually signed a contract for the AEW&C programme – also known as Peace Eagle – in June 2002 and this was approved by US Congress the following year. The deal covered procurement of four aircraft plus two options. Ankara paid $637m in advance for the project, which was valued at a total of $1.5bn.
Hybrid airframe
The selected aircraft – known locally as the E-7T – is based on Boeing’s 737-700 civilian airliner and is similar to the AEW&C solution selected by both Australia and South Korea. While the reinforced fuselage is taken from the 737-700 BBJ (Boeing Business Jet), the strengthened wing, tail surfaces and undercarriage are from the 737-800. The CFM56-7 engines are the same as those used on the 737-900 and were selected due to their additional power – 27,300lb thrust for take-off. Contrary to the civilian 737-700, the E-7T has an aerial refuelling capability and can dump fuel if required.
In terms of avionics, the aircraft employs the Northrop Grumman Multi-Role Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) surveillance radar, which also provides an identification friend or foe (IFF) capability. The Peace Eagle contract also included ground support facilities, crew training, mission support and system maintenance and software support provided by Boeing.
Following the completion of all the laboratory, ground and flight tests for the first aircraft, the airframe would undergo modifications to install the AEW&C software and hardware.
img_81-1_41.jpg

Operating unit for the Turkish Peace Eagle force is 131 Filo, also known as the 131’inci Havadan İhbar Kontrol (HİK) Grup Komutanlı g˘ ı (131st Airborne Warning and Control Group Command). The squadron serves alongside the NATO E-3A AWACS detachment at Konya.
All photos Onur Kurç and Tayfun Ya s˛ar unless otherwise stated
All these procedures were to be carried out at Boeing’s facilities in Seattle, Washington. However, all the structural and radar modification procedures for the remaining three aircraft would be carried out at Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) facilities in Ankara. An agreement signed between TAI and Boeing on January 28, 2004 brought many Turkish firms into the project. As well as TAI, the Turkish companies included Aselsan, Havelsan, MİKES, Turkish Airlines and Selex ES Turkiye.
Aselsan was responsible for producing GPS equipment and UHF/VHF radios. Havelsan carried out specific software integration and modification and tested the aircraft and ground support systems on behalf of the THK. MİKES undertook software and hardware development and produced the electronic support measures (ESM) sub-system. Turkish Airlines was assigned the tasks of training the aircrews and performing aircraft maintenance. Pilot training was planned to make use of a simulator within Turkish Airlines facilities at İstanbul Ataturk Airport. Finally, Selex was responsible for development and production of HF radios.
The first aircraft (06-001, later 13-001/N356BJ) was rolled out at Boeing’s Renton facility in Washington on November 11, 2004. Originally, it was planned for delivery to the THK in 2007. The other three aircraft were to be taken from the 737-700 BBJ production line in Seattle and delivered to TAI’s facilities in Ankara for fitting out. Once in Ankara, the MESA radars would be installed and structural modifications and tests would be carried out. A first aircraft was delivered to TAI at Ankara on March 13, 2006 with the second following on October 2 that year.
Training of THK personnel to serve on the aircraft began in 2008. The first ten pilots selected were sent to Boeing’s facilities in Seattle in groups of two, two and six.
img_81-2_25.jpg

A pair of Peace Eagles, E-7T serials 13-003 and 13-004, on the flight line at Konya air base in central Anatolia. The aerodynamic effects of the huge fairing for the MESA radar are compensated for by two large strakes under the rear fuselage.
img_82-1_54.jpg

The 737-based Peace Eagle was selected in favour of a rival AEW&C aircraft design that combined the Airbus A310 and Israeli Phalcon radar. Boeing’s E-7T flight deck was the first to be provided with a twin head-up display (HUD).
img_82-2_37.jpg

The E-7T cabin includes ten consoles for the mission team. The Peace Eagle is also used for maritime support missions, including over-the-horizon targeting for Turkish Navy warships.
Early delays
On September 6, 2007 the initial aircraft performed its first flight with radar and subsystems installed. A first mission system test flight was completed on December 12 the same year. This tested the aircraft’s communications, including establishing links with ground-based stations. Ultimately, the project was delayed by seven years because of software problems and, reportedly, the failure of the MESA radar to attain the expected levels of sensitivity. As a result of the delay, Boeing reduced the overall cost of the programme by $59m. Compensation of $183m, including interest, was also provided and it was decided that the support terms of the project would be increased from two years to five.
Three years of software maintenance support were also provided and spare parts worth around $32m were offered as compensation.
The delay also affected the second and third aircraft, which were to be converted in Turkey. Modification of a first aircraft by TAI in Turkey was completed at the beginning of June 2008 and it made its first flight in ‘full-up’ configuration the following month. The second and third aircraft remained at TAI facilities, where tests were carried out at the same time as the problems on the aircraft in the US were being resolved. Meanwhile, systems for the fourth aircraft were tested in a Boeing laboratory.
On November 29, 2011 one of the E-7Ts at TAI waiting for the completion of tests of the first aircraft was temporarily returned to Boeing.
The aircraft was displayed on Boeing’s stand at that year’s Dubai Airshow, with a crew of Turkish and American personnel. Although it wore the colours and markings of the THK, it had not yet been handed over to the air force and retained its US registration.
3rd Main Jet Base
The E-7T serves with the THK’s 3’ncu Ana Jet Us Komutanlı g˘ ı (3rd Main Jet Base Command) at Konya. The same base is home to NATO E-3A AWACS aircraft. Operating unit for the E-7T is 131 Filo, also known as the 131’inci Havadan İhbar Kontrol (HİK) Grup Komutanlı g˘ ı (131st Airborne Warning and Control Group Command).
The callsign ‘EJDER’ (‘dragon’ in Turkish) was selected for the aircraft, recalling the ‘Ejder Squadron’ that had previously flown F-4Es at Konya. The unit was closed down in 2004 as F-4Es were taken out of inventory as part of THK restructuring. The callsign was selected at the request of the 131st Airborne Warning and Control Group Command personnel. Other new units were established alongside the 131st Airborne Warning and Control Group Command:
• Flight Teams Squadron Command
• Mission Teams Squadron Command
• Standardisation Squadron Command
• Ground Support Squadron Command A hangar was also built at the 3rd Main Jet Base for the routine maintenance of these new aircraft.
Handover
After all the delays, Boeing-modified E-7T serial 13-001 was handed over to the 131st Airborne Warning and Control Group Command on February 21, 2014 during a ceremony held at Konya. The aircraft was named Kuzey (north).
img_82-3_14.jpg

Electronic support measures and electronic intelligence equipment features systems from Elta controlled by an ALR-2001 computer. Other mission equipment includes Link 11, Link 16, Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS), Mode S IFF and satellite communications.
img_83-1_45.jpg

The aircraft is well equipped with electronic warfare self-protection equipment including the AN/ AAR-54 missile approach warning system, LWS-20 laser warning system, AN/AAQ-24(V) directed infrared countermeasures system and chaff/flare dispensers.
In contrast with other aircraft, the E-7T was produced with four ‘eyebrow’ skylights above the cockpit window. This provides a wider field of view for pilots during turns and allows celestial navigation. Boeing subsequently deleted these windows from the design of the newer-generation 737s with more advanced avionics systems. In addition, Kuzey lacks the vortex generators in front of the cockpit window that are found on the other three E-7Ts. On its completion of required modifications and tests at TAI, the second aircraft, named Do g˘u (east), serial 13-002, joined the THK inventory in May 2014. The third aircraft, named Guney (south), serial 13-003, was added to the inventory on September 4, 2014.
The last aircraft joining the fleet, on December 9, 2015, was Batı (west), serial 13-004. This aircraft differed since it featured updated software. It was planned that this software would be integrated into the other aircraft in the fleet in the future. Due to the delays in delivery, the aircraft’s C and D maintenance checks were now due. The procedures were carried out in the Turkish Airlines maintenance hangar at Ankara Esenbo g˘ a Airport.
The E-7T can stay airborne for approximately ten hours and mission time can be increased up to 20 hours thanks to aerial refuelling. The two pilots are provided with a twin headup display (HUD) – the first time Boeing had used this arrangement. A mission team of specialist officers and sergeants supports the pilots. The aircraft features ten consoles and can operate with a maximum crew of 19.
Early warning and control missions rely on the 360° coverage provided by the new-generation stabilised radar. To this day, coverage of Turkish airspace is provided by ground radar ranges across the country. The E-7T offers a larger and wider field of view compared with ground-based radars. They are far less likely to be affected by scattered returns from mountains or valleys. The aircraft can therefore fill the gaps in ground radar coverage.
The real-time radar image can be shared with ground radars and fighters via a secure data link system. Unlike conventional radars, the MESA radar does not require special maintenance and has no moving parts that could wear out and reduce its performance. Furthermore, radar range can be increased by focusing its signals on a specific area if needed.
When required, the aircraft can be used as an airborne operations centre. In this role, the E-7T is used as a communications relay platform, typically conveying up-to-date information and instructions via data link and encrypted radio to Turkish fighters, flying at low altitude. It is noteworthy that some THK fighters lack radar warning receivers (RWR) and therefore the E-7T plays a very important role in alerting them when they are being targeted by a hostile radar emitter.
img_83-2_27.jpg

Serial 13-001, the first E-7T for the THK, undergoes maintenance on its ‘top hat’ radar in a Konya hangar. The L-band MESA radar provides 360° coverage using a stationary antenna that is 35.5ft (10.8m) long and weighs 6,500lb (2,948kg).
Operational missions
During July 8 and 9, 2016 the E-7T was called on to ensure aerial security during the NATO Summit held in Warsaw. This was the first overseas mission for the aircraft.
More recently, E-7Ts have served in the southeast of Turkey to monitor movements along the Syrian border. The aircraft was on permanent duty along the border and proved very effective in detecting border violations and directing a response by Turkish fighters on combat air patrol (CAP) duty.
Thumbnail

Originally published in AirForces Monthly Magazine​

 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom