TR F-16 Özgür | Hürkuş - Fighter Trainer Aircraft Projects

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,992
Reactions
239 20,758
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
If it had been realistic to produce around 160–170 Özgür-II upgrades by 2028/29 and bring the majority of the F-16 fleet up to this standard in a timely manner, there would have been no need for Eurofighters as an interim solution from Qatar, Oman or the UK.
That is not quite correct. F16V70 and “Typhoon Tranche-3 and newer” are not in the same league. Typboons are much more potent fighting machines with better RCS and as air superiority fighter-jets they are miles ahead of the US plane. The only thing that will bridge KAAN to F16s are planes like Typhoons. Just check out @Sanchez ’s post regarding our pilots’ reaction to Qatar’s Typhoons and Rafales when they confronted them with our f16s.

F16 with SABR AN/APG-83 radar is a compromise. It is set up so that it will give F16 an AESA radar to improve on the current system. Same is the case for Murad to a certain degree.
Typhoon can supercruise at 1.5 Mach. It can go as high as 68000ft. Operational altitude is 55000+ft.
ECRS radars are in a different league with over 1600 T/R modules. (Especially the MK2 version with EW)
Twin engines in total can develop 31000lbf dry thrust in war setting for short periods and 27000lbf dry thrust continuous. (F16 can only manage 17700lbf dry thrust)

I can go on and on. But in short they are much more potent planes. We needed them.
KE and Anka-3 would. Not fill in the gap of fire power these planes can provide. Their uses are unique and different.
 

AlperTunga

Committed member
Messages
189
Reactions
4 219
Nation of residence
Switzerland
Nation of origin
Turkey
That is not quite correct. F16V70 and “Typhoon Tranche-3 and newer” are not in the same league. Typboons are much more potent fighting machines with better RCS and as air superiority fighter-jets they are miles ahead of the US plane. The only thing that will bridge KAAN to F16s are planes like Typhoons. Just check out @Sanchez ’s post regarding our pilots’ reaction to Qatar’s Typhoons and Rafales when they confronted them with our f16s.

F16 with SABR AN/APG-83 radar is a compromise. It is set up so that it will give F16 an AESA radar to improve on the current system. Same is the case for Murad to a certain degree.
Typhoon can supercruise at 1.5 Mach. It can go as high as 68000ft. Operational altitude is 55000+ft.
ECRS radars are in a different league with over 1600 T/R modules. (Especially the MK2 version with EW)
Twin engines in total can develop 31000lbf dry thrust in war setting for short periods and 27000lbf dry thrust continuous. (F16 can only manage 17700lbf dry thrust)

I can go on and on. But in short they are much more potent planes. We needed them.
KE and Anka-3 would. Not fill in the gap of fire power these planes can provide. Their uses are unique and different.
That's why I have been saying 20 EFs not sufficient. We need to have at least 40, and with the mighty radar Mk2. That is a beast and in EW capability within top 3 (maybe even the best) in the world. Given all the money we are paying for spare parts, training, infrastructure etc. we should increase the number of jets even though they are very expensive.

Regarding F16 modernization: Given that no structural upgrade needed (or should be left out given time constraints) for 40/50 versions, they just need to install the main computer and radar etc. Per jet, this should be doable in 2 weeks. If two groups of technicians work, then we can modernize at least 50 per year. So by end of 2029, we can realistically have 150 modernized F16. But we'd better hurry up.
 
Top Bottom