British PMs tend to take orders from higher-up and higher-up find Turkey a very useful partner in the current environment.
If you examine British history, you will find that they have a lot of flexibility when it comes to diplomatic entanglements.
UK rarely paints herself into a corner, for the most part she's everyone's ally and enemy at the same time. For example the British empire made countless secret agreements with nations against 3rd nations. They would make a secret deal with france to come to her aid if she is attacked by germany, while she would make the same secret agreement with germany should she be attacked by france.
Ofcourse Britian would then get to pick and choose in the case of war if she would intervene or not.
Even with all the rhetoric against Ukraine, "the city of London" is where the Russians wash their money. Despite the sanctions i still think its the biggest financial centre for dirty Russian money.
Few nations have behaved as duplicitous as the British in history.
Just look at British media concerning the PKK/YPG, its entirely pro terrorist and anti Turkey. So on the surface it looks like we have good political relations, but below they are working to empower the enemies of Turkey. But the british do it in such a way that they can win from both sides, they get what they want from the Turks and they get what they want from the PKK.
I don't know if this is true or not, but someone once told me that the "term" to be double-crossed is to do with British Imperial behaviour and the double cross of the British flag. So the act of betrayal may have become synonymous with the British.
the Mossad has lost its prestige and has become a joke no exaggeration 
