TR Foreign Policy & Geopolitics

[Khagan1923]

Good. And we we are get in return?

More Refugees probably as always.

 

[Barry]

More Refugees probably as always.

And more brow-beating about human rights and how we're not European plus something worthless about visas

 

[what]

EU Customs Union revamp is the minimum we should ask for and participation in EU procurement and defense projects.

 

[Khagan1923]

EU Customs Union revamp is the minimum we should ask for and participation in EU procurement and defense projects.

This government has never shown to be able to get the maximum out of its positions be it regarding the EU, Middle East or Northern Africa. Let's not be delusional, as long as certain people's pockets get filled they will come to an understanding even if it hurts the interests of the average citizens of this Republic.

Any regular Government would demand participation in several military projects (Future Logistical Airlifts, MPA and so on) as well as visa free travel and economic perks. What we will get is some agreement signed behind closed doors with "aides" present who don't even own a Turkish Citizenship. And the details will get out years later when the average Turk has to live with the consequences.

 

[Sanchez]

Sadly couldn't get past the paywall, but this is interesting:

"Ukraine, Europe is looking for partners: Turkish-led force possible​

Prime Minister Costa probes the availability of India, Japan, Canada, Australia for the peacekeeping contingent. Erdogan, who has never broken with Moscow, is a candidate for command"

Ucraina, l’Europa va in cerca di partner: possibile una forza a guida turca

Il presidente del Consiglio Costa sonda le disponibilità di India, Giappone, Canada, Australia per il contingente di pace. Erdogan, che non ha mai rotto con Mo…

www.repubblica.it

New Trumpian order is forcing us to get closer to EU.

 

[Iskander]

Very interesting
interview with Vladimir Socor, Senior Fellow at the Jamestown Foundation in Washington and a world-renowned expert on the former Soviet republics and Russia:
"Trump will surrender Ukraine and Eastern Europe to Putin"

- Moscow continues the war against Ukraine, Washington stops military aid to Kyiv, the US turns away from the EU, Europe says goodbye to America in NATO, Russia offers the US untold natural resources, and France seems to be becoming Europe's nuclear shield. Agree, a month ago, few could believe that this was even possible, right?

- You should not look for common sense in the decisions made by Trump and his entourage. The US president simply has no strategy. The concepts of Trump and strategy are antonyms! Trump does not know how to perceive the situation in the world and cannot form any strategic line. In principle, he is an uneducated person, he does not understand the history, geostrategy and culture of Europe. The current US president acts intuitively, and his views can change daily.

- What about the advisers? Usually, the White House owners had such knowledgeable consultants as James Baker, Henry Kissinger or Zbigniew Brzezinski…

- Unlike his first term, Trump does not have independent advisers now. During his first presidential term, he was surrounded by bright personalities - combat generals, experienced diplomats and even businessmen who could be proud of their successes in life and career. These were independent and strong personalities, such as Generals James Mattis and McMaster, Kelly, CIA Director Mike Pompeo, National Security Advisor John Bolton… They were at the peak of their careers. Now Trump is surrounded by weak middle-level people who have not had significant success in their personal careers. They are dependent on Trump, and their activity consists of deep admiration for their boss.

Throughout their term, they will compete with each other over who will bow down to the occupant of the Oval Office and how much. Trump's team members have neither the authority nor the desire to advise the president on anything right. And most importantly, they have absolutely no courage to say that their boss is wrong. And Trump is wrong several times a day...

Аналитик Владимир Сокор: «Трамп сдаст Путину Украину и Восточную Европу» - наши беседы о главном

haqqin.az

 

[MhhJA]

Sadly couldn't get past the paywall, but this is interesting:

"Ukraine, Europe is looking for partners: Turkish-led force possible​

Prime Minister Costa probes the availability of India, Japan, Canada, Australia for the peacekeeping contingent. Erdogan, who has never broken with Moscow, is a candidate for command"

Ucraina, l’Europa va in cerca di partner: possibile una forza a guida turca

Il presidente del Consiglio Costa sonda le disponibilità di India, Giappone, Canada, Australia per il contingente di pace. Erdogan, che non ha mai rotto con Mo…

www.repubblica.it

New Trumpian order is forcing us to get closer to EU.

Ukraine, Europe seeks partners: Turkish-led force possible
by our correspondent Claudio Tito
Ukraine, Europe goes in search of partners: possible Turkish-led force

Council President Costa probes the availability of India, Japan, Canada, Australia for the peacekeeping force. Erdogan, who has never broken with Moscow, is a candidate for the leadership

BRUSSELS - Broadening the ‘coalition of the willing’ to include allies outside the European Union and even countries on other continents. Also studying the possibility of entrusting the command of the peacekeeping contingent to one of these states. Knowing that in ‘pole position’ could be Turkey. The day after the European Council gave the go-ahead to the ‘Rearm Europe’ package prepared by Ursula von der Leyen, attentions shifted to the ways in which the composition of the force in charge of guaranteeing a possible truce between Russia and Ukraine could be carried out.
Ukraine - Russia war: live non-stop

Macron to Europe: ‘We will offer allies nuclear shield’
Lavrov: ‘Macron like Hitler and Napoleon’
US goes back on talks with Kiev and even denies it intelligence
Trump suspends military aid to Ukraine: this is what happens


Dossier - War trails

The heads of the European institutions - von der Leyen, Costa and Kallas - informed the leaders of Turkey, the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway and Iceland of the ‘important decisions taken yesterday’ in a video conference. ‘Our cooperation with like-minded NATO partners,’ the President of the European Council emphasised, ’is crucial for international security, for Ukraine, to intensify our joint defence efforts. Together with our partners in Europe, across the Atlantic and beyond, we must work to support Ukraine and ensure a just and lasting peace'.
Germany, 1.7 trillion in ten years. Debt turnaround: Berlin rearms itself
by our correspondent Tonia Mastrobuoni
07 March 2025

But the central point now is above all to prove that it is possible to organise a peacekeeping contingent without US participation. The prerequisite for all the contacts and simulations experienced in recent days is the Kremlin's position, which at the moment does not want to give the green light to an EU-only presence in Ukraine. The talks with Great Britain, Turkey, Canada, Norway and Iceland have this as their first objective. But it will probably not be enough. In fact, talks are underway to involve countries as far away as Japan, Australia and India. This is seen as the way to ‘appease’ Moscow and at the same time have a large pool of soldiers. Considering that this interposition force is unlikely to be less than 40,000 men.

Not only that. At this stage Putin has made it explicitly clear that he would not accept a leadership role from France and Great Britain. The only non-European country (not in the political sense) capable of taking on such a role is then Turkey. These are ongoing reflections. It is no coincidence that the leader of Ankara yesterday openly confirmed his readiness for direct engagement: ‘I would like to stress that we are ready to make any contribution, including hosting the negotiation process, to the establishment of a just, lasting and honourable peace in Ukraine’. In his opinion, as France's Macron had proposed, we need ‘a truce as soon as possible’. He then gave a clear signal to Brussels: ‘European security is not the exclusive business of the countries of the Union’.

It must be considered that Turkey is a NATO member but has maintained excellent relations with the Kremlin. And while ruling out a role for the Atlantic Alliance, Erdogan's troops can represent a mediation between the needs of one side and the other. One of the reported drawbacks, if anything, concerns the bad relations with Greece and Cyprus.

Any operation, however, needs two preconditions: Russian guarantees not to promote other attacks; the American willingness to ‘back-up’ the mission, i.e. to ensure the military logistics part. ‘It is in our mutual interest,’ Erdogan explained, ‘to plan all stages of European security with Turkey. It is also important to maintain the transatlantic connection and get the support of our American ally'.

London Premier Keir Starmer also judges the EU decision as ‘a historic step forward’. However, setting up the operation will not be easy. It will take at least three months to get it going and several billion in funding.

 

[No Name]

https://www.lesclesdumoyenorient.co...rica-3-3-A-military-presence-that-is-now.html

Great article on Turks growing influence in Africa.

 

[Huelague]

We are not „good enough „ to live equal with the Europeans, but good enough to die for. I say, no thanks.

 

[Huelague]

We are not „good enough „ to live equal with the Europeans, but good enough to die for them. I say, no thanks