Your tries to make some kind of indirect insults does not bother me, meanwhile in real time and world, my points are gettimg proven especially if you check replies.
OK...but:
A) She is Indian (you are not). So we can at least flesh out where her perspective, context and credibility comes from (unlike you - a foreigner, who just inserted a cheap shot and expected to get away it).
B) She doesn't use the trope "Nazi" here (like you did). Nazi is very specific. If you warned about Hindu nationalism in your original post of contention....I would have no issue to take it further.
Various <insert> nationalism movements are found worldwide and wax and wane due to different circumstances.
The have to do the <insert>qualifier because nationalism as is, is insufficient for them. That is why its not true nationalism (which needs no <insert> mark) which originates from the consitutional framework and its larger principles instead.
C) If we ask Rana Ayyub about East Pakistan and if it was ethnic cleansing there (much like Rohingya situation, but at far larger scale)....what do you think her answer would be (in comparing to the actual Nazi basis)?
If we ask Asadudin Owaisi same question (East Pakistan ethnic cleansing at scale by state policy) and other Indian muslim leaders and parliamentary representatives the same thing....what would be the answer? Do you even know?
They have all made their voices known on what they think Hindutva is doing to the country....but they know the greater principle to call out extremes from their community and from neighbourhood.....and definitely where it rises to level of Nazism like it did only during 1971.
i.e they wont undermine where they are coming from as far as possible (just because of co-religion argument), something lost on you
Would those answers be the same as yours?:
"2) not such.
3) impossible,"
i.e would it be a matter of
your filter coming in again?
Filter of extreme kind that Anthony Mascarenhas could not get through at the time?
You seem to have little to no idea about Nazism is, and the scale of totalitarianism needed for it that would have snuffed out voices like them (whatever is right and wrong in them) a long while ago simply for being different.
Either that are you are actively trying to diminish the scale and victims of actual NSDAP....by calling everything you don't like as Nazism if it takes sociopolitical root.
Then you make issue of me calling you "Mr. cheapshot"
Since you take such active interest in white-knighting for Turkey and Turks here in this forum....
How exactly would an Indian be received here that comes between a conversation (nothing to do with domestic politics) regarding Turkey and some other X country (that is not India).....and saying something like:
Oh wow you best be careful about making relationship with Turkey and Turks! Just look up "scholarly articles" (by whichever minority) about rise and/or legacy of Nazism there.
He would get no questioning back to see the bigger principle (of his own application) and apply it to his country first? Some more visceral reactions would come (since he used the word Nazi to begin with)?
What would it be like if its not Indian but simply a co-religionist (i.e islamist) from some other country bringing this up? It hasn't happened yet in this forum? Its happened multiple times from what I've seen.
i.e not even use proper term like say right wing extremism (so you can even study what the context of left and right wing are in the country and why)....but go right to Nazism.
It is something lot more than a cheapshot, but I will leave it as cheapshot.
It is easy to see where it comes from....why you cling to islamism in this particular way.
What differentiates you from the true Bosnian nationalist in this forum for example.
We would have very many more of you in subcontinent if we were "balkanised" same way at same intensity like Yugoslavia did to itself ....and have artifacts of it up close like Republic srpska within own country.
Instead we have our system and our affairs, and you cherrypick what suits you...from the emotional angst you come from your particular take on Bosnian experience....same way you do when you try debate certain Turks here, and they ask you.....uh are you Turkish? as first principle.
Understand this, it is not our fault that Yugoslavia did not turn out like this:
Our new survey of 29,999 Indian adults takes a closer look at religious identity, nationalism and tolerance in Indian society.
www.pewresearch.org