Live Conflict Israel-Palestine War|Regional Escalations

[Bogeyman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747724993809555601

 

[GoatsMilk]

so someone actually did point it out.

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1747604076714418238?s=20

 

[GoatsMilk]

also the MAD mullah regime claims the targets in Pakistan were related to Isreal.

https://x.com/clashreport/status/1747603706181288117?s=20

you got to be a proper mug to fall for the iranians and their bullshit. Absolute jokers.

 

[Gary]

As I said earlier, the U.S would need to physically occupy All of Yemen to stop this from happening.

Impossible.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747713986479702368

 

[Scott Summers]

As I said earlier, the U.S would need to physically occupy All of Yemen to stop this from happening.

Impossible.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747713986479702368

Damage to the Red Sea trade routes is something the US and EU would love to see.

It has far more impact at China (Belt & Road Initiative) than the US/EU.

 

[satria]

Focus video

Al-Qassam Brigades target an Israeli Merkava tank with an Al-Yassin missile

Al-Qassam Brigades broadcast scenes of its fighters clashing with occupation soldiers and vehicles in Gaza City

 

[Relic]

These 'Lol' are getting unnecessarily disrespectful.

And no, I am not overrating Iranian air defence network. Just stating my opinion. They have shown some impressive technologies in recent years. I will assume they will be able to do their job until proven otherwise.

Besides, I am yet to see any credible evidence S-400 failed to shoot down storm shadow within its engagement range. IMO, it probably flew under the radar. Which would be same for all air defenses, irrespective of western ones or eastern ones.

However, there are evidences that S-400 in many instances failed to shoot down HIMARS rockets.

If you genuinely feel disrespected by somebody (in this case me) typing "lol", then I apologize. No disrespect intended. That said, it seems like a silly thing to take personally. But I digress...

Pakistan had absolutely no problem getting get PGMs through Iran's defense network in retaliation for the Iranian strike on the Pakistani territory. Now, is there a chance Iran simply chose not to intercept those PGM's and instead let them impact? Yes I guess it it's possible.

You're completely entitled to your opinion, but I'm not swayed away from mine. I see no evidence based reality in which Iran (a fairly large country) has the density / layers / quality of air defenses neccessary to successfully stop the Americans from destroying one or more of their military facilities if the Americans were determined to make it happen. I would need to see evidence of large quantities of American cruise missiles being intercepted, especially when used in combination with MALD and fired from numerous air and sea based strike platforms.

The last time a Middle Eastern country featured "high end" air defense capabilities that people held in high regard was Iraq, during gnthe Gulf War. American, British and Allied strike aircraft bombed with near impunity and thoroughly dismantled the Iraqi air defense network, quickly and methodically.

 

[Afif]

If you genuinely feel disrespected by somebody (in this case me) typing "lol", then I apologize. No disrespect intended. That said, it seems like a silly thing to take personally. But I digress...

Pakistan had absolutely no problem getting get PGMs through Iran's defense network in retaliation for the Iranian strike on the Pakistani territory. Now, is there a chance Iran simply chose not to intercept those PGM's and instead let them impact? Yes I guess it it's possible.

You're completely entitled to your opinion, but I'm not swayed away from mine. I see no evidence based reality in which Iran (a fairly large country) has the density / layers / quality of air defenses neccessary to successfully stop the Americans from destroying one or more of their military facilities if the Americans were determined to make it happen.

USA can and will successfully destroy significant Iranian military infrastructures if she is determined to do so.

That is not what I am arguing about.

You said-

Are you going to sit here and try to tell me that if the U.S. launched a combination of 50+ TLAM / JASSM / LRASM, supported by MALD from destroyers, submarines and a variety of strike aircraft, at a significant Iranian military installation, that enough wouldn't get through to severely damage / destroyed that base / facility / infrastructure?

I am refuting this particular claim of 50+ CM would be enough to pass through Iranian air defenses in neccessary numbers to destroy significant Iranian military installations. (IMO 70% or more would be shot down if there is a significant AD present)

"During the conflict in Syria, the United States employed massive cruise missile strikes on two occasions; in both cases, the damage inflicted was in no way proportional to the amount of munitions used.

During the strike on Shayrat Airbase on April 7, 2017, the United States fired 59 missiles. Satellite imagery shows only 44 targets hit, although some may have been hit twice.13 It is possible that Russian jamming may have diverted some missiles off target, although there is no way to be certain without access to classified information. Russia’s Krasukha, an electronic warfare jamming system, was reported in the area at the time of the strike.14 Regardless, the airbase was launching airstrikes less than 24 hours after the attack.15

The Challenge of Dis-Integrating A2/AD Zone: How Emerging Technologies Are Shifting the Ba

American adversaries are building anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) zones to keep the US military out of key regions. The Chinese set up A2/AD zones to deny US access to Taiwan and the South China Sea.

ndupress.ndu.edu

 

[satria]

Al-Qassam Brigades Love IDF so much

 

[Gary]

I am always frustrated whenever I see IDF getting holed inside a building and the RPG rounds Hamas fired are not Thermobaric rounds

 

[Afif]

I am always frustrated whenever I see IDF getting holed inside a building and the RPG rounds Hamas fired are not Thermobaric rounds

Use of Thermobaric weapons is controversial in legal Islamic framework.

 

[Kartal1]

Use of Thermobaric weapons is controversial in legal Islamic framework.

Bro, I am scared to to even write so I don't get That was a joke'd

 

[Scott Summers]

No day is better than the day you see a Israeli funeral.

More, more, more funerals with crying colonists and IDF-thugs.

 

[Gary]

said to be a U.S MQ-9 shot down in Iraq

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748049780779942260

Slowly but surely this will escalate.

 

[Scott Summers]

Its already escalated, my friend.

The Cabal are pushing on the buttons to start WW III.

Because the coming financial crash will be bigger than the one in 1928 that was responsible for the rise of the Fuhrer.

Life is never fair, and perhaps it is a good thing for must of us that it is not.

 

[mehmed beg]

Personally, I can't wait for ww3.

 

[Ravager]

Use of Thermobaric weapons is controversial in legal Islamic framework.

To be honest ... As long as the fatwas hasn't been ruled out ...we could always find a common ground ....as long as it's fired to the Israelis ..

Personally, I can't wait for ww3.

Seriously ... Guys , please ... My debts hasn't been cleared out yet here ... Give me a couple more years will you..

 

[Kartal1]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748345166283362574

 

[Gary]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1748300297846607983

 

[Gary]

I can't believe it took the Egyptians that long to give us a permit for docking, KRI 992 just departed for Egypt to deliver aid to Gaza yesterday.