we had more than that and we got rid of them in 1962
guess how we did it ?
we won the independence war, and they happened to be french citizens, traitors of their hosts who brought them europe during the prosecution, they thrived and got filthy rich living among us, and the payment was siding with the french and participating in oppressing us on our own lands with their former prosecutors and committing unspeakable attrocities against the local muslim population, they get full rights while we live like dogs (cremieux decree of 1870). they saw the writing on the wall along with the french colonizers and their Harki lackies (algerian traitors), and fucked off. i call it the filth's integrated self cleaning mechanism, we didn't have to "ethnically cleanse" anyone out of anything.
lastly, fact that there's muslims still in occupied palestine doesn't negate the fact that ethnic took and is still taking place, its just being done at a level that is palatable by the average US honky and euro conservacucks
There is something strange going on in Gaza. While Hamas promised very serious opposition Israel controls a lot of land already. Equipment is hit, ambushes are done etc but it is clearly not enough or there is different strategy going on? I really don't know. I mean Gaza with all its infrastructure and importance is what is on the ground and not underground. Most probably very strategic importance is given to the tunnel network and there are strategic facilities within it but there must be effective defense of territory. If Hamas is defending a de-facto country it should go out of the guerilla warfare tactics it uses. We are not talking about hit and run, infiltrations etc but we are talking about the defence of Gaza. Maybe they are trying to let IDF deep enough so they can choke them in but I don't think that is the case we see here. Yes, there are equipment losses, damaged equipment but this will not stop IDF from advancing. If Hamas wants to hold ground it must effectively destroy choked IDF forces and effectively push out the remaining.So in terms of military performance, how is hamas doing? Are they just losing ground with each passing day?
There is something strange going on in Gaza. While Hamas promised very serious opposition Israel controls a lot of land already. Equipment is hit, ambushes are done etc but it is clearly not enough or there is different strategy going on? I really don't know. I mean Gaza with all its infrastructure and importance is what is on the ground and not underground. Most probably very strategic importance is given to the tunnel network and there are strategic facilities within it but there must be effective defense of territory. If Hamas is defending a de-facto country it should go out of the guerilla warfare tactics it uses. We are not talking about hit and run, infiltrations etc but we are talking about the defence of Gaza. Maybe they are trying to let IDF deep enough so they can choke them in but I don't think that is the case we see here. Yes, there are equipment losses, damaged equipment but this will not stop IDF from advancing. If Hamas wants to hold ground it must effectively destroy choked IDF forces and effectively push out the remaining.
The faster it ends the better for Hamas. Hamas doesn't have a stable logistics supply and we can only speculate for how long they can last on stocks under high intensity. Some would compare it with the rebels in Syria and their dire conditions in the fighting around Damascus but this is not similar. Some of the Assad forces were running smuggling channels allowing equipment and supplies to enter the besieged towns but here the situation with IDF is different. I don't think Egypt will also want to be a side in the conflict by allowing wide scale smuggling because it will make smuggling networks on Egyptian territory a legitimate target of the IDF.
There must be something to it but lets wait and see.
On the first look both cases are comparable but while TSK cleared Afrin together with its tunnel network there is still no confirmation if IDF started tunnel clearing operations in large scale.It is like what YPG said about Afrin but Hamas are folding tens of times faster
So in terms of military performance, how is hamas doing? Are they just losing ground with each passing day?
Respect to Algeria for fighting for its independance.
Its Independance war was just like the Turkish one.
Where millions of our fore fathers sacrificed their lives.
The worldwide media at the time called both the Turks and Algerians as barbaric terrorists who need to be civilised and wiped out.
I hope one day the Palestinians can one day liberate their lands.
There is something strange going on in Gaza. While Hamas promised very serious opposition Israel controls a lot of land already. Equipment is hit, ambushes are done etc but it is clearly not enough or there is different strategy going on? I really don't know. I mean Gaza with all its infrastructure and importance is what is on the ground and not underground. Most probably very strategic importance is given to the tunnel network and there are strategic facilities within it but there must be effective defense of territory. If Hamas is defending a de-facto country it should go out of the guerilla warfare tactics it uses. We are not talking about hit and run, infiltrations etc but we are talking about the defence of Gaza. Maybe they are trying to let IDF deep enough so they can choke them in but I don't think that is the case we see here. Yes, there are equipment losses, damaged equipment but this will not stop IDF from advancing. If Hamas wants to hold ground it must effectively destroy choked IDF forces and effectively push out the remaining.
The faster it ends the better for Hamas. Hamas doesn't have a stable logistics supply and we can only speculate for how long they can last on stocks under high intensity. Some would compare it with the rebels in Syria and their dire conditions in the fighting around Damascus but this is not similar. Some of the Assad forces were running smuggling channels allowing equipment and supplies to enter the besieged towns but here the situation with IDF is different. I don't think Egypt will also want to be a side in the conflict by allowing wide scale smuggling because it will make smuggling networks on Egyptian territory a legitimate target of the IDF.
There must be something to it but lets wait and see.
a guerilla group doesnt fight for land, it fights for infliction of financial and moral loss, if they switch doctrine and start fighting to gain land they'll immediately get wiped out, its heart wrenching seeing the zionists there but its the nature of the war...So in terms of military performance, how is hamas doing? Are they just losing ground with each passing day?
Perhaps hamas had a different strategy which was calculated with the consent of Hezbollah but Biden with his career strike groups change the equation . Perhaps their plan was , in the event of ground operation in Gaza Hezbollah would join the fight . But US intervention changed the situation . If Hezbollah joined the fight definitely America will pounded them and it will be devastating for Hezbollah which they want to avoid .There is something strange going on in Gaza. While Hamas promised very serious opposition Israel controls a lot of land already. Equipment is hit, ambushes are done etc but it is clearly not enough or there is different strategy going on? I really don't know. I mean Gaza with all its infrastructure and importance is what is on the ground and not underground. Most probably very strategic importance is given to the tunnel network and there are strategic facilities within it but there must be effective defense of territory. If Hamas is defending a de-facto country it should go out of the guerilla warfare tactics it uses. We are not talking about hit and run, infiltrations etc but we are talking about the defence of Gaza. Maybe they are trying to let IDF deep enough so they can choke them in but I don't think that is the case we see here. Yes, there are equipment losses, damaged equipment but this will not stop IDF from advancing. If Hamas wants to hold ground it must effectively destroy choked IDF forces and effectively push out the remaining.
The faster it ends the better for Hamas. Hamas doesn't have a stable logistics supply and we can only speculate for how long they can last on stocks under high intensity. Some would compare it with the rebels in Syria and their dire conditions in the fighting around Damascus but this is not similar. Some of the Assad forces were running smuggling channels allowing equipment and supplies to enter the besieged towns but here the situation with IDF is different. I don't think Egypt will also want to be a side in the conflict by allowing wide scale smuggling because it will make smuggling networks on Egyptian territory a legitimate target of the IDF.
There must be something to it but lets wait and see.
Your plan would work if it was a guerilla war , but when the enemy destroy everything what is standing , in this scenario all your strategy will fail . There is no chance to fight hand in hand . Hamas is doing well in their strategy . I will give them credit as they resist a giant for so long time . Can you remember all Arab states were crashed only by 6 days , Egypt by 19 days . Only meaningful resistance were done by Hezbollah and Hamas . After guerrilla warfare Tunnel warfare is a great invention in the history of military warfare .Ameen ... Ya rabbi ameen
If i was a Hamas field commander . I was going to wait for Idf to congregate and spread thin try to hold city proper . Why , because the technological superiority of the enemy . The only meaningful fight is if the fight were to occured in hand to hand fighting . Considering the limitation of resources in my disposal .. wait the enemy are partially entrenched in the center and make a coordinated attack in all fronts ...simultanously .
That's the only way you could inflict a heavy casualties to the superior enemy .
The key word here is ... Only a true and commited/disciplined fighter could pull this action and coordinated accordingly ...
Did hamas fighter tick the boxes ?? Only time will tell ..
My only clue is Hezbos hasn't step up their dailly attack in northren fronts
There is something strange going on in Gaza. While Hamas promised very serious opposition Israel controls a lot of land already. Equipment is hit, ambushes are done etc but it is clearly not enough or there is different strategy going on? I really don't know. I mean Gaza with all its infrastructure and importance is what is on the ground and not underground. Most probably very strategic importance is given to the tunnel network and there are strategic facilities within it but there must be effective defense of territory. If Hamas is defending a de-facto country it should go out of the guerilla warfare tactics it uses. We are not talking about hit and run, infiltrations etc but we are talking about the defence of Gaza. Maybe they are trying to let IDF deep enough so they can choke them in but I don't think that is the case we see here. Yes, there are equipment losses, damaged equipment but this will not stop IDF from advancing. If Hamas wants to hold ground it must effectively destroy choked IDF forces and effectively push out the remaining.
The faster it ends the better for Hamas. Hamas doesn't have a stable logistics supply and we can only speculate for how long they can last on stocks under high intensity. Some would compare it with the rebels in Syria and their dire conditions in the fighting around Damascus but this is not similar. Some of the Assad forces were running smuggling channels allowing equipment and supplies to enter the besieged towns but here the situation with IDF is different. I don't think Egypt will also want to be a side in the conflict by allowing wide scale smuggling because it will make smuggling networks on Egyptian territory a legitimate target of the IDF.
There must be something to it but lets wait and see.
On the first look both cases are comparable but while TSK cleared Afrin together with its tunnel network there is still no confirmation if IDF started tunnel clearing operations in large scale.
Also it is important to note that both forces are well prepared for defence but the difference in time for preparation, planning and the scale of operations is substantial. I wouldn't underestimate Hamas in this regard. There is most probably something we are missing at this moment. I just can't believe that Hamas would crumble so fast under Israeli pressure while taking in account their tunnel network, communication capability, intelligence, manufacturing capabilities, large stockpile and extensive training. For sure there is something to it.
Social media has become such a thorn in the side of Western media hegemony:
we're gonna see them move to restrict "reach" on social media websites for "undesirable" actors immediately in the coming months.
a guerilla group doesnt fight for land, it fights for infliction of financial and moral loss, if they switch doctrine and start fighting to gain land they'll immediately get wiped out, its heart wrenching seeing the zionists there but its the nature of the war...
but once they lose gaza, whats the point? Once you lose all the land and your people are completely expelled from the lands what was the point of the actions? especially the october 7th action which opened the flood gates for the Isrealis to pile in?
we must look at the big picture, as things stand right now a palestinian state is simply impossible, the way things were, israel was making money out of the blockade through aid funds that gets spent on their goods and services, probably at hiked prices, it kept the violence contained in gaza, if gaza gets occupied then they just gave the palestinians there something to hit repeatedly and make it a funds sink, considering their economy is already struggling their value to their western subsidizers would start to shrink and gets the ukraine treatment eventually.
secondly, we know from history that complacency will lead to annihilation, only fighters survive no matter the odds, we've seen that in countless places from vietnam to to turkey to algeria, even if the population of gaza is driven out of their homes it'll come at a cost that's fatale to the jews and their allies: the west bank will realize that fighting is imperative else they'll endup the same way, hizbollah will back the palestinian resistance in lebanon because it will know it'll be next, iran will double its support, and egypt will be plunged into chaos for the sake of israel, sooner or later the generals in charge there will realize the current path no longer serves the envisioned interests of egypt and will ruin them.
no matter how the zionist entity would react to this, they've been strategically defeated the moment the attack was a success:
1-their myth of the invincible army and all knowing intelligence services was shattered
2-their deterrence of unrestricted warfare isn't only futile its now no longer acceptable by the international community
3-any reaction they would've produced would've led to a massive strategic loss
if only one of these points was fulfilled i'd say the palestinian resistance assault was a resounding success.
We can talk about guerilla warfare in its hit and run tactics when the scale is bigger. Here we are not talking about the mountains of Tora Bora, the deserts and remote villages in Iraq or the jungles and remote villages in Colombia. Hamas, YPG and ISIS are comparable because all of the groups are established around the concept of area control. (I don't want to start the "who is terrorist talk" just discussion purely in a military way)a guerilla group doesnt fight for land, it fights for infliction of financial and moral loss, if they switch doctrine and start fighting to gain land they'll immediately get wiped out, its heart wrenching seeing the zionists there but its the nature of the war...