Latest Thread
and why Iran who is trying to wait until 2026 to potentially become a nuclear power and through that deterrence force an acceptance of its reintegration into the banking and finance system of the world, is trying to avoid a war scenario.
Iran, unlike North Korea and also Russia since the Minsk accords were trashed, has been in constant negotiations with the Western powers from the time of Khatami in the late 90s when they bricked their centrifuges willingly as they thought correctly they are prime target post-9/11 (not to mention Iran Contra affair). As per here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossad_infiltration_of_Iranian_nuclear_archive), Iran was quite close to a bomb and they gave it willingly at the time to avoid a U.S. invasion.How will becoming a nuclear power help Iran with ”acceptance of its reintegration into the banking and finance system of the world”?
There are already two known nuclear powers, Russia and North Korea, which are both under heavy sanctions and practically decoupled from the financial system. If Iran becomes a nuclear power, they can say goodbye to any hope of reintegration into the global financial system.
So yeah to reiterate, Iran is willing to negotiate and compromise and the sanctions on them are much more severe than Russia despite what numbers might indicate. Because of this, the deterrence of nuclear bombs and the lifting of the spectre of regime change, will strengthen their hands in negotiations massively.
Nope, if anything it's been the U.S. which has emphasized for decades that Iran needs to come to the negotiating table regarding their proxies, their missile program, their blocking of the golden crescent opium trade (well ok they don't say that part out loud), their black market weapons trade, etc. etc. If anything it's been Iran who has been stubborn about keeping the negotiation strictly about the nuclear program; this is a well-known fact, I can send you tens of articles and news pieces in Farsi, Arabic and naturally English showcasing the attitude of both sides wrt the content of the negotiations.I agree with what you said, except for the part where nuclear bombs will strengthen their negotiating hands.
The West is willing to negotiate with Iran with the purpose to keep it away from building nuclear weapons. If they get the nukes, why would the West negotiate with them anymore?
And they also dug themselves into a big hole with the weapons they provided to Russia against Ukraine. Europeans will be less eager to be friendly with Iran now.
The only realistic chance Iran has to rejoin the global financial system is for regime change to happen.
Regime change in Iran is impossible for the coming decades, as anyone with a deeper knowledge of Islamic Republic's structure will know; the only realistic thing is for it to balkanize and lose parts in Kurdistan, Azerbaijan, Khuzestan and Baluchistan regions to be left with a central Iranian plateau rump state.
Yeah. And we like it to stay that way: doctrinaire, parochial and incompetent.That’s sad, because regime change was the only good option for Iran. As long as the current regime remains in charge, Iran will be a pariah state under sanctions and poor. There is no way the current regime can achieve anything good for the country. It’s the same with countries like Cuba, Venezuela or North Korea. The current regimes are incapable of doing anything good.
Iran is in an extremely tough spot. Worse than many of us realize.
If they don't respond Hezbollah could disintegrate. If they do respond then the regime itself will be at serious risk.
Decades of buildup for nothing.
After the second American carrier strike group arrived in the region, Tehran's ayatollahs quietly removed the red flag of revenge. After the assassination of Nasrallah, Tehran this time decided to limit itself to raising the black flag of grief
Scott, post all of your racist horseshit in the one post, man, not like...six.
It's also easier for people to inevitably report it.
Also, Cyclops would disapprove of you bigtime. Yeesh.