And it wasn't a leader's party then like it is now. Nayers were pretty open about it while Erdogan was pushing them to accept.Let me remind you that at that point, Erdoğan's party had a two-thirds majority (quorum) in the Grand National Assembly.
Latest Thread
And it wasn't a leader's party then like it is now. Nayers were pretty open about it while Erdogan was pushing them to accept.Let me remind you that at that point, Erdoğan's party had a two-thirds majority (quorum) in the Grand National Assembly.
At that time, Turkey was unable to pursue a fully independent foreign policy. However, Erdoğan decided to break this pattern from the very beginning. The Justice and Development Party (AKP) fully supported him. Not a single party member opposed him. And since the party held a majority in the Grand National Assembly, Washington's proposal was rejected. Even though Turkey would have been offered tens of billions of dollars and other benefits had it accepted.And it wasn't a leader's party then like it is now. Nayers were pretty open about it while Erdogan was pushing them to accept.
Turkey rejecting demands to use Turkey as a launchbed for the 2003 invasion(for its benefits and problems) was a case of independent foreign policy.Turkey was unable to pursue a fully independent foreign policy.
That's exactly how it was back then. Moreover, the Americans even interfered in Turkey's internal politics!Turkey rejecting demands to use Turkey as a launchbed for the 2003 invasion(for its benefits and problems) was a case of independent foreign policy.