• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
530
Reactions
16 951
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Fox News can confirm that the 2nd crew member of the downed F15E fighter jet has been rescued and he and the members of the rescue team that extracted him from behind enemy lines in Iran are all safely out of Iran. That according to two senior US officials and multiple well placed sources in the region. The Weapons Systems Officer ejected along with the pilot when their F15E Strike Eagle they were flying was struck Thursday night (early Friday local time) in southwest Iran.

The WSO used the SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape) training to evade capture, hiding on an elevated ridge after hiking away from the wreckage and putting out an emergency beacon.) US Special Operations rescue forces to include PJs (United States Air Force Pararescuemen (PJs) and many layers of elite rescue forces took part in the complex, layered mission to both find the crew member and also keep the Iranian forces who were hunting the American weapons system operator at bay. There are videos that have appeared from local eyewitnesses that show what appear to have been injured and dead Iranian members of the IRGC and Basij who were looking for the downed American crew member. Fox has learned there was fighting on the ground but no Americans killed during the operation. “It was a very complex operation to retrieve the downed service member,” a well placed source briefed on the operation told me. Many different branches of the US military were involved in the rescue.

Fox News can confirm the A10 Warthog that crashed Friday was involved in providing cover for the rescue teams searching for the pilot. That A10 crashed in Kuwait (first reported by ABC Friday) but the A10 pilot managed to eject safely and was rescued. There was destruction of aircraft which have sensitive equipment on board, I am told, all part of this complex CSAR (Combat Search and Rescue) mission.

The F15E was pretty much destroyed on impact. Two rescue helicopters were hit by enemy fire on Friday and crew members onboard were injured by enemy fire but managed to make it out of Iran.

There were a lot of elements to this rescue, I am told.

 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,181
Reactions
125 19,013
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Slayer

Committed member
Messages
210
Reactions
2 377
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

Oublious

Experienced member
The Netherlands Correspondent
Messages
2,775
Reactions
15 6,089
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
USAF Pararescue are too elite, and managed to rescue the downed pilot deep inside Iran


It has nothing to do with elite, Iranian are weak. Look in this case ther would choppers and drones flying over the area with SIGINT equipments to locate the enemy. What wher the Persians doing? Local tribes searching for the enemy :D. Not even people from IRGC or the normal army.

They missed a big bargaing chip....
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
530
Reactions
16 951
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
This is what happens when you lose air superiority. Iranian even not have enough MANPAD so in sparsely populated areas, there is space for special operations.
But that is not mean such of operation can be finished with no cost, US had lost two A-10, two C-130, two HH-60G and so on. And, they also claimed there were no casualties, but this is clearly not true.
How many times can they do such of action is a big question, Iranian is going to shot down more fighter in the future.
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
530
Reactions
16 951
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Satellite imaging company Planet Labs says it will indefinitely withhold Iran war imagery after a request from the Trump administration.

The limit to Satellite imaging company has less benefit to reduce Iran capability for target confirm, the mostly reason is to control OSINT and serving as propaganda to cover up battle damage.
 

Azeri441

Contributor
Messages
556
Reactions
6 1,950
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
It has nothing to do with elite, Iranian are weak. Look in this case ther would choppers and drones flying over the area with SIGINT equipments to locate the enemy. What wher the Persians doing? Local tribes searching for the enemy :D. Not even people from IRGC or the normal army.

They missed a big bargaing chip....

literally no other country would be capable of flying in C-130s and setting FOB deep inside enemy territory to rescue a single pilot and then getting everyone out
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
literally no other country would be capable of flying in C-130s and setting FOB deep inside enemy territory to rescue a single pilot and then getting everyone out
What kind of a comment is that?
Many countries can do what the Americans did in Iran.
So,it depends on where you do it,not if you can do it.
Think about it and come back.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,181
Reactions
125 19,013
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
literally no other country would be capable of flying in C-130s and setting FOB deep inside enemy territory to rescue a single pilot and then getting everyone out
Closest I think would be the Entebbe Raid and they had a fully functioning airport and the earlier failed Eagle Claw, also in Iran. Funny thing; CV-22 was entirely sold and later developed as a tailor built platform to combine the best sides of a cargo aircraft and a helicopter and it would be great in CSAR ops with lessons learned from Eagle Claw. But, there were no CV-22s deployed by the air force for this mission. 46 years after Eagle Claw, we once again saw cargo aircraft and helicopters to do the business instead of CV-22. I think it's less about the platform and more about highly trained and specialized aircrews still not "upgrading" to CV-22s.

The limit to Satellite imaging company has less benefit to reduce Iran capability for target confirm, the mostly reason is to control OSINT and serving as propaganda to cover up battle damage.
I can't really fault Americans for doing this tbh.

What kind of a comment is that?
Many countries can do what the Americans did in Iran.
So,it depends on where you do it,not if you can do it.
Think about it and come back.
Nope, I'm pretty sure this was unparalleled. Required total air supremacy; the gall to send in nearly unprotected MC-130s and HH-60s with overhead cover from F-35s and drones, MC-130s deploying MH-6s from their cargo bays, 30 hours of gunfight; not being able to take off with the stuck/damaged MC-130s so sending in more aircraft to retrieve everyone. They burned through like 5 aircraft and 4 helicopters to rescue one guy. We for example don't have that number of CSAR aircraft and certainly not the crews. Noone else in NATO does; Russians wouldn't bother saving one pilot; Chinese are entirely clueless about these kinds of ops. "Leave no man behind" motto is a wholly American thing that later trickled down to NATO countries through the decades. Others simply don't have this kind of mindset or operational readiness.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
Nope, I'm pretty sure this was unparalleled. Required total air supremacy; the gall to send in nearly unprotected MC-130s and HH-60s with overhead cover from F-35s and drones, MC-130s deploying MH-6s from their cargo bays, 30 hours of gunfight; not being able to take off with the stuck/damaged MC-130s so sending in more aircraft to retrieve everyone. They burned through like 5 aircraft and 4 helicopters to rescue one guy. We for example don't have that number of CSAR aircraft and certainly not the crews. Noone else in NATO does; Russians wouldn't bother saving one pilot; Chinese are entirely clueless about these kinds of ops. "Leave no man behind" motto is a wholly American thing that later trickled down to NATO countries through the decades. Others simply don't have this kind of mindset or operational readiness.
That not it,the French and British could do it in current Iran where there is almost no Air defence specially in that area/part of the country.
The Americans made the mistake of assuming they had a free hand,no defence at all.
If they had covered a 10/20 km radius with satelite coverage and more aircraft they would have done it without casualties.
Just a big miscalculation as they did many times before.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,181
Reactions
125 19,013
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
That not it,the French and British could do it in current Iran where there is almost no Air defence specially in that area/part of the country.
The Americans made the mistake of assuming they had a free hand,no defence at all.
If they had covered a 10/20 km radius with satelite coverage and more aircraft they would have done it without casualties.
Just a big miscalculation as they did many times before.
French have shown in the past that they don't have the capability in Africa during Barkhane and Serval other than the most simples CSAR ops and Brits simply don't have the capability.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
French have shown in the past that they don't have the capability in Africa during Barkhane and Serval other than the most simples CSAR ops and Brits simply don't have the capability.
What dont the French and British have the Americans do for such a rescue?
Similar situation to Afghanistan,no?
 

Passenger

Contributor
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
530
Reactions
16 951
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Closest I think would be the Entebbe Raid and they had a fully functioning airport and the earlier failed Eagle Claw, also in Iran. Funny thing; CV-22 was entirely sold and later developed as a tailor built platform to combine the best sides of a cargo aircraft and a helicopter and it would be great in CSAR ops with lessons learned from Eagle Claw. But, there were no CV-22s deployed by the air force for this mission. 46 years after Eagle Claw, we once again saw cargo aircraft and helicopters to do the business instead of CV-22. I think it's less about the platform and more about highly trained and specialized aircrews still not "upgrading" to CV-22s.


I can't really fault Americans for doing this tbh.


Nope, I'm pretty sure this was unparalleled. Required total air supremacy; the gall to send in nearly unprotected MC-130s and HH-60s with overhead cover from F-35s and drones, MC-130s deploying MH-6s from their cargo bays, 30 hours of gunfight; not being able to take off with the stuck/damaged MC-130s so sending in more aircraft to retrieve everyone. They burned through like 5 aircraft and 4 helicopters to rescue one guy. We for example don't have that number of CSAR aircraft and certainly not the crews. Noone else in NATO does; Russians wouldn't bother saving one pilot; Chinese are entirely clueless about these kinds of ops. "Leave no man behind" motto is a wholly American thing that later trickled down to NATO countries through the decades. Others simply don't have this kind of mindset or operational readiness.
Source said this operation is not the only one in the few days, there were other tries for landing but failed.

Yes, China has zero preparing of such actions, but the right choice is avoid send any man drive aircraft to the air zone has not been controled.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,299
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
So they landed 2 x C130 with probably 2 x 2 MH6 little bird helicopters inside (that is how many it can accommodate with rotors folded) and these helicopters and plane were totalled by US forces when IRGC units arrived and started a firefight and no one even were injured. Those MH6s have 2 crew members and 6 Special Forces soldiers each. C130 have a crew of 2-5 as well. That makes 36-40 men landed and their aircrafts were destroyed. But they all survived.
Then they were all extracted to safety with the one rescued pilot. (Do we know how the extraction occurred?)
That only happens in films!!

Going back to @TR_123456 ’s comments; If you have total air superiority and total control of enemy airspace over the area, any well trained special forces of a modern army can attempt such a rescue operation. But the area has to be well cleansed from ground forces too. Otherwise you lose aircrafts and personnel.

You send men in the land forces to attack heavily fortified enemy lines, knowing very well that many will not survive. Same logic has to be applied to airforce too. It is not good logic to put 40 men in to danger to save one. This is war!
 
Last edited:

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
1,161
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,317
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
photo_2026-04-05_14-38-08.jpg


The biggest achievement of IRGC in this war so far: they managed to captured US pilot underwear.
 

Satan

Active member
Messages
48
Reactions
1 52
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Netherlands

This is the leader of the free world.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
4,181
Reactions
125 19,013
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
What dont the French and British have the Americans do for such a rescue?
Similar situation to Afghanistan,no?
Numbers, training and firepower. This is not even in contention. French cannot even do a major airlift without American assistance. Brits don't even try.

Yes, China has zero preparing of such actions, but the right choice is avoid send any man drive aircraft to the air zone has not been controled.
You could say don't start a war over a mountainous country in the first place, but it is what it is.

So they landed 2 x C130 with probably 2 x 2 MH6 little bird helicopters inside (that is how many it can accommodate with rotors folded) and these helicopters and plane were totalled by US forces when IRGC units arrived and started a firefight and no one even were injured. Those MH6s have 2 crew members and 6 Special Forces soldiers each. C130 have a crew of 2-5 as well. That makes 36-40 men landed and their aircrafts were destroyed. But they all survived.
Then they were all extracted to safety with the one rescued pilot. (Do we know how the extraction occurred?)
That only happens in films!!

Going back to @TR_123456 ’s comments; If you have total air superiority and total control of enemy airspace over the area, any well trained special forces of a modern army can attempt such a rescue operation. But the area has to be well cleansed from ground forces too. Otherwise you lose aircrafts and personnel.

You send men in the land forces to attack heavily fortified enemy lines, knowing very well that many will not survive. Same logic has to be applied to airforce too. It is not good logic to put 40 men in to danger to save one. This is war!
Numbers we have are 2 MC-130s, 2-4 MH-6s, 2(+?) HH-60s, and then 3 Dash 8s(or CN-295; which could be unrelated).

Weiss says up to 100 personnel was involved and were extracted. Pilot climbed a hill and trekked few kilometers and was extracted by an MH-6.


Noone is claiming no American was injured. We don't have that information. There are also claims of a mortar emplacement sending accurate shots over the FARP which might have hit one of the aircraft. But we wouldn't expect these men to sit around in aircraft if it was hit or not. From what's available we know that there was a continued firefight that lasted hours and MH-6s and overhead aircraft provided fire support to the running WSO "for hours." No modern army have this kind of firepower and the logistics train to undertake this kind of operation outside its borders in such a short notice. We don't for example.

This is the American way of doing war; they accept going into the fire with the belief that help cavalry will be on the way if things go bad, and it did arrive on this occasion. Same happened in Libya in 2011, in Mogadishu, multiple times in Vietnam, WW2. Even so, Trump admin couldn't accept a POW; so they went all in.
 

hugh

Contributor
Messages
567
Reactions
17 1,533
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

This is the leader of the free world.
he's really funny, i'll give him that :ROFLMAO:

we had the strait open before you started bombing their schools you dumb mf. what exactly did you achieve with this war? you cleared out the old admin and replaced it with young hardliners who's hellbent on making nukes. you also gifted the strait to Iran which they will never cede and use it as a toll-booth to recuperate.

--

he will probably produce a dumb excuse to walk away from this threat like he always does. no one takes him seriously anymore.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,299
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
No modern army have this kind of firepower and the logistics
Bro, no modern army has the US’s firepower and logistics. Full stop.
They are the top dog in terms of these two capabilities.

But it doesn’t mean that other modern armies lack the capability to attempt a similar rescue operation. Would they risk it? That is the question!

In this case US were also lucky.
They had full control of the skies,
They had a sort of a landing strip they could use,
Where the F15 crashed was close to Kuwait for bringing in back up.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom