Japan could become partner nation on UK-led future fighter effort, says program director

[xizhimen]

It's a recurring theme with this lot in general.

High on the blah, high on the inflated padded stats (pass it around kumbaya copy-paste numbers stronk) high on the time for spreading it....but low on the quality, low on the actual info.

In fact its a recurring joke among people in the know to find a whole group of science papers from China that all count individually in the stats ("technically" separate paper)...but all are basically saying the exact same thing.

You account for all of that and its more or less par for the course from PRC.

I think we are talking about "high quality‘’ science papers

https://the-japan-news.com/news/article/0007665265

China passes US to top output of influential science papers

Academic strength could help further increase nation's industrial dominance

asia.nikkei.com

 

[Nilgiri]

I'd like to clarify it actually needs one to read up the paper's themselves (in an actual field of worth one has gotten into)....to get an idea of where/how stuff gets circle jerked referenced in same inner crowd vs what is actually relevant and intellectually-tiered.

All stuff that is inversely proportional to being the apex of intelligence that is a cherry-pick multi-fora spammer....given basic sustained resources found in time vs intelligence for certain activities (obvious to all).

When you have to put realised dollars to the IP flow, it shows up even more. But that is the kind of thing that gets cherry-picked out by the "intelligence" of the spam approach.