Japan could become partner nation on UK-led future fighter effort, says program director

xizhimen

Experienced member
Messages
7,391
Reactions
383
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
It's a recurring theme with this lot in general.

High on the blah, high on the inflated padded stats (pass it around kumbaya copy-paste numbers stronk) high on the time for spreading it....but low on the quality, low on the actual info.

In fact its a recurring joke among people in the know to find a whole group of science papers from China that all count individually in the stats ("technically" separate paper)...but all are basically saying the exact same thing.

You account for all of that and its more or less par for the course from PRC.
I think we are talking about "high quality‘’ science papers


 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,175
Reactions
87 18,515
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
I'd like to clarify it actually needs one to read up the paper's themselves (in an actual field of worth one has gotten into)....to get an idea of where/how stuff gets circle jerked referenced in same inner crowd vs what is actually relevant and intellectually-tiered.

All stuff that is inversely proportional to being the apex of intelligence that is a cherry-pick multi-fora spammer....given basic sustained resources found in time vs intelligence for certain activities (obvious to all).

When you have to put realised dollars to the IP flow, it shows up even more. But that is the kind of thing that gets cherry-picked out by the "intelligence" of the spam approach.
 
Last edited:

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom