Latest Thread
What kind of mistake would that be ?Today, MIT's UAVs launched strikes against some YPG/PKK terrorist organization targets in northern Syria.
Two shots were fired at a factory/market called "Golden Rose" in the village of Kerbawi in the southwest of Qamishli.
Sukr Haji village in the countryside of Malikiye city
Looks like the US did a mistake and here is the response.
There are bilateral agreements with the US that are not announced to the media. Within these bilateral agreements basically there are boundaries that are defined by both States in order to ensure the safety of US and Turkish personnel and to keep a trend in de-escalation. Such an agreement may be violated by the US trough a weapons delivery, specific action or directive towards the SDF which is concerning for Turkiye. In this case we keep our right to respond by violating the de-escalation agreement by resuming our UCAV strikes on the east of Euphrates.What kind of mistake would that be ?
To be honest I think We should do more to ensure that Kamisli/Qamisli is cleaned of terrorist and sympatizers than we're doing.
This will benefit Turkiye in no way. My read of the situation is that the base is made in advance for the times when the YPG/PKK will transfer power to the Regime by putting Regime flags while keeping the YPG/PKK structure by just rebranding the forces in Ayn Al-Arab. The Russian base may serve as surveillance base, area task force HQ and a guarantee against possible Turkish operation in the area.I read that the Russians in cooperation with the Syrians are building a huge militairy base in Ayn Al-Arab (Kobani) next to our border.
How will this benefit Turkey?
Wouldn't hitting arms delivery not be preferable action as less weapons would mean less tension. Surely the US would get the message. And if they insist on supplying from alternative routes we'd send a different message, like hitting oilfields.There are bilateral agreements with the US that are not announced to the media. Within these bilateral agreements basically there are boundaries that are defined by both States in order to ensure the safety of US and Turkish personnel and to keep a trend in de-escalation. Such an agreement may be violated by the US trough a weapons delivery, specific action or directive towards the SDF which is concerning for Turkiye. In this case we keep our right to respond by violating the de-escalation agreement by resuming our UCAV strikes on the east of Euphrates.
There is no other reason to why we stopped hitting targets there and allow SDF to function while we have all the power to do it. There is a certain level of escalation that is understandable.
Hitting at the exact moment arms delivery is done is a bit risky as there is most probably US personnel supervising the transfer procedure. Hitting weapons depots may be possible and I think we've done it in the past. By the way, we are not sure what is the action that aggravated our stance, so this is a speculation. There may be other reasons that we don't know of.Wouldn't hitting arms delivery not be preferable action as less weapons would mean less tension. Surely the US would get the message. And if they insist on supplying from alternative routes we'd send a different message, like hitting oilfields.
We can't do nothing because for our enemies time is their ally.
Nope. They couldn't advance so deep, but multiple accounts reported things like that. The reports are false.Is it true that regime forces controlled an oil facility previously controlled by the PKK?
And here I thought how on Earth would the US allow thatNope. They couldn't advance so deep, but multiple accounts reported things like that. The reports are false.
Chances of a new Israeli attack to Hmeimim tonight increased tenfold now.
The whole Axis of Resistance is preparing on all fronts.Russian/Syrian ELINT aircraft spotted over Bab and Hezbollah movement in Tal Rıfat.
Thanks for keeping this thread updated. The situation in Syria is complex, and Turkey's involvement adds another layer. Looking forward to more insights and discussions on this.